Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
Well my picks didnt turn out too bad this past week - main problem was that I was 'heavily invested' in the pack and they dropped the ball (literally).
And then carolina lost - if carolina would of won. I would of been sitting pretty. Had 2 3 team bets that would of worked out ...

but thats done and dusted.

Some adjustments to my betting - I'm going to use less $ on my triple bets and play some more double bets. Perhaps do some low money bets with 4 and up for kicks.
Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
We got some interesting match ups this week - and some interesting spreads.

All the spreads and money lines are not in yet but here is a preview:
(I tend to like underdogs; ie better moneyline or spread if I decide to take it)
but I only like underdogs if I think they will win (makes sense)

titans(+2.5) @ jets - jets have been doing real well here; Im going to have to watch the titans game. I have a feeling the titans may pull this one off.

jaguars(+3.5) @ texans - I definately like the texans with this one; ie they beat the titans and have a amazing offense. Might watch the game here also.

chiefs(no spread listed yet) @ eagles - have a feeling the spread will blow. And considering mcnabb will probably be out again; I'm not so sure. If its under 7 spread against the eagles I may go for it.

ravens play the browns and the giants play the buccs; problem is the spread blows -13 against the ravens and -7 vs giants. Easy wins but lousey spreads; and the giants play in tampa.

redskins(-6) @ lions - I like the lions here; but want to watch the game vs min to get a better idea how they can handle a high powered D.

Pack(-6.5) @ rams - least the spread isnt past 1 td. We should win easily (thats what peeps said last week thou); and with our safety issues it could be a little more challenging. I will still take the pack this week thou. 6.5 isnt bad.

niners(+7) @ min - now this is a interesting match up. niners have been cruising under the radar all offseason and now into the season. I'm pretty tempted to take the niners on this one. But again this could go either way IMO.

bears(-1.5) @ seattle - seattle may have to sit hasselback; want to watch their game vs the niners anyways ... Id go with the bears here but I want to see how their backupqb is in seattle.

NO(-5.5) @ bills - saints should own the bills.

Denver (+1.5) @ raiders - like denver here

Ind(no spread yet) @ cards - like the cards depending on spread


have to see how some of these other spread work out; and Id like to watch some of these games.

My favorite matches so far would be the texans, packers (if we cant beat the rams we might as well pack it up), and NO

close seconds would be the broncos, bears(depending on what I see on the tape for seattle and if they got hasselback or not), detroit(Im tempted to put them on a upper team bet but well see), giants, Ten
djcubez
15 years ago
Dulak, where do you place your bets? I just got an account at bodog today because I finally feel confident enough to start wagering small sums of cash on my picks. I had a friend that did this a few years ago when I first started college and it's how he made money on the side. Just a few smart picks a week.
Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

Dulak, where do you place your bets? I just got an account at bodog today because I finally feel confident enough to start wagering small sums of cash on my picks. I had a friend that did this a few years ago when I first started college and it's how he made money on the side. Just a few smart picks a week.

"djcubez" wrote:



living in england so betting places are everywhere - but I am doing them online via a few english sites.

ya start out small and see how you do; if you can combine teams that you think will win they stack up but then they all have to win.
Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
I got my picks in this week ...

I ended up doing a Ton of multi bets - hmmm not sure if I should of done that many. If one of the 'forsure' teams loses then its all for naught.

Oh well live and learn. I planned to only wager 30% of my balance this week but ended up going to 38% ...

What I did was rank the teams in regards to whom they were playing; ie so did 1-5
5 being the best till 1 ... 1 was for ranks in which I thought they may win but I really wasnt sure ie same with 2; 3 was good chance but could flop it. 4 was almost as good as 5.

anyways ...

like I said I did a ton of muti bets all the way up to 14 teams in a bet (ya crazy) ... but wagered for fewer pounds.

if I can make double of what I invested Ill be happy ie thats my goal - so if I invest 500 and make 500 - its all good.

Obviously with all the crazy bets I made who knows.

My top 6 picks this week are:(in this order)(these picks are in relation to the teams they are playing and their spread)(ie I normally really like MN but since they are playing SF I rank them a 3).

Packers
Houston
Baltimore
Giants
NO
SD

(these are my top 6) - when it comes to the spread ... thats where it get tricky. You can take the spread or go with the moneyline or some places let you make up your own spread.

ie I never took the spread with baltimore -13 was just too big; so I just took the moneyline and I figured a almost guarentee win but the odds blew 1.13
IMO the pack and houston should have no probs making their spread - the others could be tricky.

I also liked dallas and MN ...
but those I ranked at 3 ... and the rest of my picks I rated 1-2 were up in the air which I used for my big muti bets.

I did get way carried away on some multibets; I think I did like 20 of them but for low amounts so at least its not a big loss if I was wrong on em ... but Im going to have to re-evalaute how I want to do this.

first day I did some mutibets and I bet too much; am looking at one and the odds are really nice but again too much dough ...

To me when doing these bets; its not just what teams I like - its what teams they are facing. And I dont think you can compare necessarily from all the past games. IMO the most recent games including the preseason are most relevant.

ie last week I liked the panthers over atlanta (nice odds and I thought they could pull it off) but panthers vs dallas; nah ... too risky IMO.
Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
you would think I would be happy that I made a tiny bit of dough this week ... but no ... I think its the fact I was one game from making many many times my total stake this week (houston).

I had so many picks off my top 6 but my 2 that I stuck with the whole time was GB and houston; I did a few bets with just these and others.

And then I took my top 6 and bet on Numerous others; up to 14 teams at once. And ya I took detroit on many of these along with min phil chicago jets denver ... I took pit on a few so scratch them. But also went with arz dallas.

all because little old houston couldnt show their stuff to the jags ...

Only reason I am ahead (just barely) this week is because I took a NFC north bet (lol). Detroit, chicago, GB and min (no I didnt take the spread here).

And then did something called a heinz 57 on my 6 teams with moderate spreads. Basically it uses every combo of double, triple, quad and 5 and 6.
I probably wont use that bet again. Got 5 out of 6 correct and only made 2x my original wager. If 2 teams would of lost or missed the spread I probably would of lost some money.

I think it would be better to keep the number of teams smaller say 2-4 at the most. And the more teams I use ... the lower the amount of money I use.

And ya perhaps do some crazy bets but use very little dough and not so many.

Once monday nights game is over Ill go through exactly how much I could of done if houston would of made it (I took them at a spread thou also I think many at -5.5 and some at -2.5). Mainly to see how I can avoid this pitfal in the future but still leave it open for the possability for winning big.
Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
Well I made my picks

I did a similar process as last week; coming up with my top picks - turned out to be 6 again but in reality only felt really good about 4 of them (spreads were a bit crappy on them so I took low spreads or moneylines on them).

This time I did a bunch of branched out bets involving various combinations of certain picks - ie if I had 7 teams I did pick 5s so where if I got 1 wrong I came out ahead 2 wrong even.

I did a few large multiple picks but not as good as odds as last week (ie teams are defining themselves more so hard to get good odds for slight underdogs)

I did end up betting more then my original plan - I would say about 50%
still too much. I want to keep it at 30%.

I am attempting to develope a few different betting schemes to employ 'forsure' wins and the more 'up-in the air chances' (but high reward).

I also like the idea of the multiples since it stacks the odds and if I get them wrong as long as I can get a couple of them right it will keep me in the game.

ie - if I get 1 of my top 6 picks wrong I should still make out pretty good; 2 wrong I should be close to even. 3 wrong then I will be down and possibly lose my steak. So way to combat this would be to only invest 30% of my total steak at one time and vary the bets even when it comes to my top 6 choices. I consider the bets involved with my other choices the gravy on top.

I'm going to list some of my more 'waky picks' - these are ones that I didnt invest heavily into but that I choose to use alot of in various multiple combos.

Detroit 10.5+ took the spread with detroit at 10 1/2 points. I dont know if its just I hate the bears (although I did take them last week over seattle). Or if its because I feel the lions have a 'decent' team and 10 1/2 points is a nice spread (they were giving the viks a run for the money there the 1st 1/2).

SD - they got their RB back and then add rivers passing game; only way I see pit beating them is if the home field advantage stacks up too much against the chargers.

GB - ok not that wild of a pick; unless the refs are in-love with farve like they were last week (all those poor penalties on the niners for even breathing in farves direction). I see us beating the viks and intercepting at least 2x.

Denver - I consider denvers D better then dallas's and they have a nice running back. Could be a close game.

Ravens - I like them much better then the pats.


-oh ya I did end up putting a bit on the packers (was kind of pissed they changed the odds for the pack after I got all my bets in lol).


btw is anyone interested in talking picks here or am I just talking to the wind?
flep
15 years ago
I DON'T BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The bookies where I placed my 10.00 bet on the packers to win the Superbowl at 25/1 burnt down in a fire last night and has had to be demolished.

I've heard of welshing on a bet but this is ridiculous

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/8289329.stm 
Formed Merseyside Nighthawks. British Champions 1992. Packer fan for 32 years
UserPostedImage


I feel very wrong now!!!!!!!!!
dfosterf
15 years ago
You are cognizant of the moon phase?

Full-moon road dog theory in full effect!

Excepting the dome thing, but this is what we have a football team for.

:thumbleft:
Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
Need help on some picks for week 7

chi(+1) @ cinci
I'm leaning toward chicago because odom is out. And the bears arnt doing too bad. And I think chicago has been playing a bit better then cinci of late. But then again its a tough call for me. So whats your take and why.

SF (+3) @ Houston
No idea whom to go for here; is gore back yet? crabtree will be in but I dont expect too much until he learns the system. Houston's offense is on fire ... schaub is the best QB this season did ya know? (well stats wise).
I cant pick this one yet ... whats your take?

Bills (+7) @ panthers Bills are starting to get it together. Ya I'm leaning toward the panthers but the bills could pull it off. Whats your take?

these are my main ones that I am undecided with
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (7h) : We have re-signed LB Isaiah McDuffie
    Zero2Cool (2-Mar) : Jets taking calls for Davante Adams. That $38m cap number hurting lol
    Zero2Cool (2-Mar) : Guess it's not official until the 12th
    Zero2Cool (2-Mar) : Deebo went for a 5th to Commanders?
    Martha Careful (1-Mar) : Just like my late husband!!
    Zero2Cool (1-Mar) : Once fired up, it should be good
    Zero2Cool (1-Mar) : Sometimes, the first page load will be slow. it's firing up the site.
    Martha Careful (1-Mar) : The site is operating much faster...tyvm
    Mucky Tundra (28-Feb) : It's the offseason and the draft is still nearly 2 months away, what can ya do?🤷‍♂️
    Zero2Cool (27-Feb) : NFL teams were notified today that the 2025 salary cap has been set at $279,200,000 per club.
    Zero2Cool (27-Feb) : sssllllooooow
    Martha Careful (27-Feb) : is it just me, or has the website been slow the last couple of days?
    buckeyepackfan (26-Feb) : Damnit 2026 2nd rnd pick!
    buckeyepackfan (26-Feb) : Packers get Myles Garret and Browns 2926 2nd rnd pick.
    buckeyepackfan (26-Feb) : Browns get Jaire, + Packers #1 2025 pick and 2026 3rd rnd pick.
    beast (26-Feb) : Rams trying to trade Stafford and Kupp, then signing Rodgers and Adams? Just speculation, but interesting
    Zero2Cool (26-Feb) : Packers shopping Jaire Alexander per Ian Rapoport
    Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : Gutekunst and Jaire Alexander’s agent, John Thornton, are meeting this week in Indianapolis to determine the future of the Packers’ 28-year-
    Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : Gutekunst says Mark Murphy told him he can trade their first-round pick despite the draft being in Green Bay.
    Zero2Cool (24-Feb) : Packers. 🤦
    Zero2Cool (24-Feb) : One team.
    Zero2Cool (24-Feb) : One team petition NFL to ban Brotherly Shove.
    beast (23-Feb) : Seems like he was just pissed because he was no longer the starter
    beast (23-Feb) : Campbell is right, he's rich and he doesn't have to explain sh!t... but that attitude gives teams reasons to never sign him again.
    dfosterf (22-Feb) : I have some doubt about all that
    dfosterf (22-Feb) : I read De'Vondre Campbell's tweet this morning (via the New York Post) Florio says that if he invested his earnings wisely, he will be good
    beast (20-Feb) : I haven't followed, but I believe he's good when healthy, just hasn't been able to stay healthy.
    dfosterf (20-Feb) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
    Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
    Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
    Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
    Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
    Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
    Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    10h / Random Babble / dfosterf

    16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    2-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    28-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    28-Feb / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

    27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    24-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.