porky88
  • porky88
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
There are three keys to why the Green Bay Packers appear to be well on their way to contending for the NFC North Title in 2009. They're well-conditioned, prepared and healthy. For the first time under Mike McCarthy at anytime in a season, Green Bay is clicking on all cylinders. [url=index.php?name=Pro_News&aid=106]full article[/url].
gopackers08
15 years ago
Lets just hope that this continues during the regular season. But keep in mind we played a Bills team trying to figure itself out still. But the beginning of the regular season should be pretty easy.
blank
packersfan99
15 years ago
Yes you are right, Dave Redding, the new Strength & Conditioning Coordinator have make a really
good work this offseason. I remember a couple of interview where he breakdown the new conditioning program

From Packers.com
http://www.packers.com/multimedia/videos/2009_non_game/video_20090203__30e853889900__c7f17c4d1035/ 

http://www.packers.com/multimedia/videos/2009_non_game/video_20090401__0662980b0c9a__4ec06eed41d3/ 



I also belive Capers has been a key part for the change of the 3-4 defence, he is a good teacher, and knows the best coaches that can teach the system to their respective positions
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
ravnhawk
15 years ago
Indeed...
this next game should give us a good yard stick to where this team is...

UserPostedImage
What the hell's going on out there...
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
15 years ago
True, the Cards should be the best we have faced so far. But i think they arn't as good as their record showed last year.
It will be fun to see how our guys respond at an away game. First time this season.
UserPostedImage
bozz_2006
15 years ago
I've been wondering about Desmond Bishop and the implications of plugging him in ahead of Hawk. Just a week or two (or three? Can't quite remember, the last few weeks have been kind of a blur), there was an article about Hawk's workout habits and how people have kind of doubted his abilities his whole life.

He's had to go work hard and prove them wrong. This is a man who has historically risen to the challenge of those who bet against him. So, why not bench him?

Give Bishop a fair shot. Get Hawk good and pissed off, and (hopefully) let him rise to the occasion and get a real good competition between the two. Hawk has been the de facto starter since April 29, 2006. Letting Bishop take the field with the 1's on Friday might be the perfect way to light a fire under Hawk's ass.

edit: great article. I agree with your assessment of the coaching staff. The team has been playing with a fire that I haven't seen from them in i-can't-remember how long, and they've been doing it right out of the gates. it's been awesome. So, consider this my formal thank-you note to you, Kevin Greene.
UserPostedImage
LambeauEast
15 years ago
Great article, Porky. Dom Capers and his staff are an important part if we are to be successful this season. I DO think Bishop should get a chance with the 1s in a game situation. If Hawk is the better man for the job, it will show.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
15 years ago
Bishop was a observer for most of practice today.. MM gave some type of "bruised toe" reason.

One has to think that maybe trade talks are swirling around Bishop and they are playing it safe?

One really has to believe that they are going to try and garner some value in the tough cut downs around the linebacker positions... the above is probably just a wild speculation (or hopeful) on my part that we capture value in one of the "hard" decisions.. even if it is a player I hope we keep... lol.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Senior Member
15 years ago

Bishop was a observer for most of practice today.. Mike McCarthy gave some type of "bruised toe" reason.

One has to think that maybe trade talks are swirling around Bishop and they are playing it safe?

One really has to believe that they are going to try and garner some value in the tough cut downs around the linebacker positions... the above is probably just a wild speculation (or hopeful) on my part that we capture value in one of the "hard" decisions.. even if it is a player I hope we keep... lol.

"pack93z" wrote:



If they are contemplating a trade at the ILB position it would be my bet they would consider AJ before Bishop. The problem with that is value vs. production when you look at Hawk's salary.

I see no way DB not being a part of this team. They are going to get him on the field ESPECIALLY now that he also shows ability to cover in zone.

Nice article Porky.

What I like about this team is the attitude on defense. We were not a smash mouth team over the years, started to see some of that in '07, then it fell off again last year.
"The train is leaving the station."
porky88
  • porky88
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

Bishop was a observer for most of practice today.. Mike McCarthy gave some type of "bruised toe" reason.

One has to think that maybe trade talks are swirling around Bishop and they are playing it safe?

One really has to believe that they are going to try and garner some value in the tough cut downs around the linebacker positions... the above is probably just a wild speculation (or hopeful) on my part that we capture value in one of the "hard" decisions.. even if it is a player I hope we keep... lol.

"pack93z" wrote:



It appears that they'll start Hawk and Barnett and then sub Bishop and Chiller in for the nickel package.

I don't see them trading anyone. They need as many linebackers as they can get in the 3-4.
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
15 years ago

Bishop was a observer for most of practice today.. Mike McCarthy gave some type of "bruised toe" reason.

One has to think that maybe trade talks are swirling around Bishop and they are playing it safe?

One really has to believe that they are going to try and garner some value in the tough cut downs around the linebacker positions... the above is probably just a wild speculation (or hopeful) on my part that we capture value in one of the "hard" decisions.. even if it is a player I hope we keep... lol.

"warhawk" wrote:



If they are contemplating a trade at the ILB position it would be my bet they would consider AJ before Bishop. The problem with that is value vs. production when you look at Hawk's salary.

I see no way DB not being a part of this team. They are going to get him on the field ESPECIALLY now that he also shows ability to cover in zone.

"pack93z" wrote:



I would rather see AJ moved.. but I think he will be a hard sell to another team, as you stated contract wise.

But I can see the Packers looking at all avenues to try an recapture some value in this cut down.. as we have some players that will be let loose that will be playing on Sundays in the near future in another city..

I have been very open on my views on the linebackers.. especially with Hawk.. so I am in the same opinion WarHawk.. just thinking that they might be trying to recapture some value is all..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
gijoe82
  • gijoe82
  • 50.25% (Neutral)
  • Registered
15 years ago

I've been wondering about Desmond Bishop and the implications of plugging him in ahead of Hawk. Just a week or two (or three? Can't quite remember, the last few weeks have been kind of a blur), there was an article about Hawk's workout habits and how people have kind of doubted his abilities his whole life.

He's had to go work hard and prove them wrong. This is a man who has historically risen to the challenge of those who bet against him. So, why not bench him?

Give Bishop a fair shot. Get Hawk good and pissed off, and (hopefully) let him rise to the occasion and get a real good competition between the two. Hawk has been the de facto starter since April 29, 2006. Letting Bishop take the field with the 1's on Friday might be the perfect way to light a fire under Hawk's ass.

edit: great article. I agree with your assessment of the coaching staff. The team has been playing with a fire that I haven't seen from them in i-can't-remember how long, and they've been doing it right out of the gates. it's been awesome. So, consider this my formal thank-you note to you, Kevin Greene.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



I am more inclined to believe that Barnett might be the odd man out. I routinely hear that the type of injury that Barnett suffered (Ligament tear) can take a year or more to fully recover from, physically and mentally.
I snowboard alot and have lots of friends that have had the same injury, and they tell me it takes a long time to get to the place where in your head you are not scared of doing it again and that your knee will be there when you are (in this case) making a cut, changing direction.
blank
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
15 years ago

Bishop was a observer for most of practice today.. Mike McCarthy gave some type of "bruised toe" reason.

One has to think that maybe trade talks are swirling around Bishop and they are playing it safe?

One really has to believe that they are going to try and garner some value in the tough cut downs around the linebacker positions... the above is probably just a wild speculation (or hopeful) on my part that we capture value in one of the "hard" decisions.. even if it is a player I hope we keep... lol.

"porky88" wrote:



It appears that they'll start Hawk and Barnett and then sub Bishop and Chiller in for the nickel package.

I don't see them trading anyone. They need as many linebackers as they can get in the 3-4.

"pack93z" wrote:



Lets think this one out... 9 Backers is probably the limits..

Locks
Kampman
Chillar
Matthews

Probables
Hawk
Barnett
Bishop
Thompson
Poppinga

Bubbles
Lansanah
Havner
Jones

I think one or two of those probables may be moved for the the special teams and potential of the lowers.

And if you have a team calling you looking to give you value in return.. odds are you move the player.

So ask yourself, of all the players on the Packers defense whom would garner the most value via performance on the field, salary and be open to being moved?

Again.. wild speculation.. but a team making an offer for Bishop and offering value in return isn't out of the question.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
porky88
  • porky88
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
I think they'll keep ten.

They'll keep Havner because he can play two positions and special teams and I think they'll keep Brad Jones who has been practicing well from what I heard on tv.

Though Jones could be a practice squad candidate.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Awesome! This is what I like to see. Good stuff.

Bishop will not be traded. I think they'd have to know for sure that Barnett is capable of succeeding in this defense before entertaining any trade offers with Bishop.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
IMO Bishop cannot replace Hawk. They are different style players. Hawk is bigger, and better suited to run blitz, and take on the lead block allowing Barnett or who ever to clean up with the tackle. That extra 10-12 lbs is a big difference in that aspect of the game.

I think Hawk has gotten a raw deal by a lot of fans. Sure he hasn't been spectacular, getting his name in print like a Ray Lewis. But he has been consistent. I look at him a lot like a NT or FB. Does the dirty work allowing others to get the headlines and highlight reels spots.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Bigbyfan
15 years ago

IMO Bishop cannot replace Hawk. They are different style players. Hawk is bigger, and better suited to run blitz, and take on the lead block allowing Barnett or who ever to clean up with the tackle. That extra 10-12 lbs is a big difference in that aspect of the game.

I think Hawk has gotten a raw deal by a lot of fans. Sure he hasn't been spectacular, getting his name in print like a Ray Lewis. But he has been consistent. I look at him a lot like a NT or FB. Does the dirty work allowing others to get the headlines and highlight reels spots.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



I was about to say the same thing. In the 3-4 one of the inside linebackers is used to take on the lead block while the other gets the glory. Look at Bart Scott and Ray Lewis, Scott used to be do all the dirty work and Lewis would clean up. Same with our 2nd stringers with the blitz. Lansanah would always be the first to blitz taking on the block, while Bishop would run through the line free.
blank
seergi_o
15 years ago
If any of the ILb were to be traded, I would think it'll be chillar. I just got that feeling
dont have one lol
gopackers08
15 years ago
After the Cardinals game I must say this team is looking mighty good. I have a hard time not getting too excited so here it is: THE PACKERS ARE FAR AND AWAY THE BEST TEAM IN THE NFC NORTH AND WILL RUN AWAY WITH THE DIVISION!!!
blank
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago

If any of the ILb were to be traded, I would think it'll be chillar. I just got that feeling

"seergi_o" wrote:



Not sure about that. Chillar started in Barnett's spot over Bishop. To me that puts him as #3 on the ILB depth. Can't see him being traded unless someone makes a great value offer for him.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Fan Shout
beast (3h) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
Zero2Cool (8h) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
Zero2Cool (9h) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
Zero2Cool (9h) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

14-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines