Your biggest worry?· Page 12

Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

Obviously this is a philosophical difference here, but I still think it's unacceptable that we only attempted 12 rushes that game, no matter how dominant their defensive line was. We let those guys stay fresh, which allowed them to stay dominant the entire game.

dd80forever
Registered

15 years ago

#112

At least Capers has no problem keeping his place no lower than DC which is what he is anyhow.

"warhawk" wrote:

Ummmmm, Ok

Can you tell me what Capers job was last year?

Check your facts

blank

RaiderPride
Senior Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

#113

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

I want to hump your leg right now.

You nailed it on the head.... So did "Z"

Nuff said. Nuff said.

You can not put that loss of Brett... I put it on the coaching staff..

Even though Brett did throw up the lame duck.. Even though I saw it coming as soon as he dropped back... Even though he killed me, and I was so pissed at him.... It should have never got to that point in the game.

I think the Packers would have won the Super Bowl if they won that game.

I really do... And it makes me sick thinking about it.

RP

""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."

MassPackersFan
Member

15 years ago

#114

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

I agree. I would have to be getting 0 or negative YPC through 3 quarters to abandon the run. They gave up too easily. It happened far too often with Favre. I'm hoping the quotes from Mike McCarthy and co. about Rodgers "managing the offense", i.e. managing all of the weapons he has including the running game, will be taken to heart by that same coaching staff. You almost ALWAYS plug away at their D with some runs, at the very least to keep them honest.

porky88
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#115

Some would argue Norv Turner should be in the Hall of Fame because he's one of the best offensive coordinators in league history in his tenure with Dallas.

Troy Aikman would be first to say Dallas doesn't win the Super Bowl without Turner.

Anyone honestly think the Packers win the Super Bowl without Fritz Shurmur?

Underestimating coordinators is an un-wise move and I hope the vibe I'm getting is wrong, but Sanders is not in the same class as Dom Capers.

Yeah he fell off the wagon in Houston, but his defenses in Pittsburgh, Carolina, Jacksonville, and even Miami when working with Saban proved to be successful.

As far as him coaching last year as a position coach. Learning under Bill Belichick is never a bad career move.

Bob Sanders would end up having a nice career with half of the achievements that Capers has had.

http://www.row12.com/

warhawk
Senior Member

15 years ago

#116

At least Capers has no problem keeping his place no lower than DC which is what he is anyhow.

"dd80forever" wrote:

Ummmmm, Ok

Can you tell me what Capers job was last year?

Check your facts

"warhawk" wrote:

Your referring to the fact he went with NE in another capacity vs. excepting the DC job in Dallas? He ELECTED to do that. He didn't have to resolve himself to a job lower than what he was before being a HC.

Or maybe the fact he was on the top of the list of the Giants means nothing either.

You trying to punch holes in this guy is just typical you stretching as far as you have to in order to add some negativity in every decision made by this team regardless of how weak the arguement may be.

"The train is leaving the station."

zombieslayer
Registered

15 years ago

#117

To be fair in that Giants game, they owned the matchup between our offensive line and their defensive line.. people point at Harris getting owned in that game... which he did, but no worse than the beating we took up front.

We couldn't run the freaking ball to save our ass and in the bitter cold neither passing game did much other than the lobs into Plax.

Honestly.. between the kicking we took on the offensive line and the inability for Sanders to adjust cost us that game..

Did Brett's heave help.. nope.. but my goodness we got owned by that defense that day.. hence why I have issues to this day with our offensive line staff and players manning it.. absolutely stoned that day.

"pack93z" wrote:

+1. Your assessment is spot on.

Let me just add one thing - Brett scored more points than the greatest Offense EVER. Let that be known. And note the EVER. That is, in the history of the NFL, there has NEVER been on offense as potent, from whatever year they started (was it 1921) to today, that O was the best.

And yes, Brett and Driver got us those points. The running game didn't do squat.

The Giants D was incredible, simply incredible, come playoff time.

Instead of blaming the Pack, I give credit to the Giants. Plus, they made me a lot of money in the SB. People were willing to give me points and I flat out told them I didn't need points. They looked at me like I was on crack. Then after the game, you should have seen their faces as I collected.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

dd80forever
Registered

15 years ago

#118

At least Capers has no problem keeping his place no lower than DC which is what he is anyhow.

"warhawk" wrote:

Ummmmm, Ok

Can you tell me what Capers job was last year?

Check your facts

"dd80forever" wrote:

"warhawk" wrote:

Nice backpeddle....Continue on

blank

doddpower
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#119

You trying to punch holes in this guy is just typical you stretching as far as you have to in order to add some negativity in every decision made by this team regardless of how weak the argument may be.

"warhawk" wrote:

+1 for sure buddy!!!

Pack93z
Select Member

15 years ago

#120

Well, 93 that's not exactly big news since NY tore every offensive line a new butt for the last six or seven games of that season. Including kicking Brady's ass all over the field in the SB.

It was their time and nobody was going to stop them.

"warhawk" wrote:

Don't disagree.. they shredded everyone.. just pointing out just how lopsided that game really was in a lot of facets.. pointing the finger in one direction for that loss is incorrect.

I haven't watched that game but twice.. I get so wound up at Sanders stubbornness on display.. no adjustments whatsoever... grrrrrrr. :lol:

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (4h) : Greg Gumbel passed away today after bout with cancer.

buckeyepackfan (9h) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,

buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games

Mucky Tundra (11h) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋

Zero2Cool (12h) : I guess 3 games. Whatever

Zero2Cool (12h) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.

Zero2Cool (13h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Kanata, seek help! lol

beast (16h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status

Zero2Cool (16h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha

TheKanataThrilla (16h) : That was terrible.

TheKanataThrilla (16h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.

beast (16h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent

beast (16h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime

beast (16h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing

Zero2Cool (17h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is

Zero2Cool (17h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true

beast (18h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management

wpr (20h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

Mucky Tundra (27-Dec) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (27-Dec) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (26-Dec) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS