I know a girl who lives on a hill, she won't do it but her sister will.

What is it? :icon_smile: :icon_smile:
Who sang it? :icon_smile: :icon_smile:

Time to focus on 2009, 2008 is over!!!!!

---

Tube snake boogie

ZZ Top 😛

---

Rodgers said it was a distraction.

---

Rodgers didn't say Brett was a distraction. Rodgers had said something to the effect of being questioned about Brett non stop was a distraction. I might not have that verbatim, but that was the jist of it. Rodgers never said Brett was a distraction. It was the media that made the ordeal a distraction for him.

---

Who really cares if it was or was not a distraction, Our team still would of won the same amount of games. Remember our defense could not stop anybody...

---

Sorry Zero... He said it.

Go back to the Irvin interview and listen to it again (On Page Two of this forum.)

Not only did he say it.. He sounded pissed about it.

Listen at the 3:00 minute mark of the interview with Irvin.

http://sports.espn.go.com/stations/player?context=podcast&id=3870254 

---

dhazers new official site name for me is the "Energizer Bunny."

Man, the guy just keeps going and going and going.......

First of all, much of his blame on Ted Thompson SHOULD actually be directed towards McCarthy, if anybody, and that is a stretch.

With all the looking back and hindsight Mike McCarthy should have fired Sanders before last year. Now I totally understand why that did not happen. In '06 the defense made good strides in the last half of the season and of course in '07 they were even better....so, why WOULD he fire him?

As far as Ted Thompson is concerned you don't win 13 games and get as far as the NFC Championship game on your home field without a quality roster.

The problem last year under Sanders was that the DL would have had to have been one of the best in the NFL because he was so intent on rushing four guys 90% of the time. When Jenkins went down and KGB turned out to be a third down pass rushing specialist DUD the lack of fleibility in Sanders' philosophy and inability to adapt roared it ugly head. The result? Near miss after near miss.

So Dhazer gets his day now because of last year but with Capers and Co. it's a whole new ballgame. That defensive coaching staff has all of the NFL's respect and has proven they can turn teams around.

So a new day is coming soon and I am saying hear and now it's not because Ted Thompson has or hasn't done so much as it will be the decision to go in a different direction with the defense which was a McCarthy call. A couple to maybe three new faces. That's about it.

---

Haven't had time to listen to the interview, although if we have a full transcript, I could read it! 🙂

---

I listened and he did say it Zero, so this time your wrong

Damn, I thought I lacked being tactful. LTF raises the bar ...

Aaron Rodgers did not say Brett Favre was a distraction. In that snippet he says that Brett arriving in GB during the Family Night created an awkward locker room because the team didn't know 'who is the guy now?'. I didn't read that Aaron said Brett was a distraction in there.

Porky said he doesn't think any player will say Favre was a distraction. It was then noted that Rodgers said it was a distraction. I am saying, Rodgers has not said Favre (the man, the player, not the situation) was a distraction. I wasn't denying that the situation (which is what RP is referring to) was a distraction, more so on the lines of how I read porkys post which was saying Favre won't be labeled a distraction by any player. Which I have not heard or seen any player say Brett Favre was a distraction.

There's no denying the situation created by Favre unretiring was a distraction. I can't think of any player during that time who was interviewed by anyone who wasn't asked about Brett at least once. How can that not be a distraction?

---