16 years ago
True.

Looking through 3 round mocks, I see Brace going late 2nd to early 3rd.

BTW, while searching for 3 round mocks, I noticed Walter Football has a very intriguing mock for us:
1. BJ Raji (NT)
2. Clint Sintim (OLB)
3a. Jamon Meredith (OT)
3b. Mark Parson (CB)
UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
16 years ago

True.

Looking through 3 round mocks, I see Brace going late 2nd to early 3rd.

BTW, while searching for 3 round mocks, I noticed Walter Football has a very intriguing mock for us:
1. BJ Raji (NT)
2. Clint Sintim (OLB)
3a. Jamon Meredith (OT)
3b. Mark Parson (CB)

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



Good picks. But why does anybody feel like CB is a need? What, C-Wood, Harris, Tramon, Pat Lee and Blackmon isn't enough. I maybe understand Jenkins because is a once-in-a-decade athlete at that position that could potentially fall to us. I'd much rather take a 3-4 DE at that spot.
This is a placeholder
16 years ago
I think because we rarely draft for immediate need, but rather good picks that will pay off a few years down the road as the players develop. CB will probably be a need in a few years, at least for depth.
UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
16 years ago

I think because we rarely draft for immediate need, but rather good picks that will pay off a few years down the road as the players develop. CB will probably be a need in a few years, at least for depth.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



I understand, but getting fit for the 3-4 seems like a bigger need right now. And Cullen Jenkins is the only prototype in our team for that DE position right now.
This is a placeholder
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
16 years ago

I think because we rarely draft for immediate need, but rather good picks that will pay off a few years down the road as the players develop. CB will probably be a need in a few years, at least for depth.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



I understand, but getting fit for the 3-4 seems like a bigger need right now. And Cullen Jenkins is the only prototype in our team for that DE position right now.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



There you go talking about what we "need" again and like has been said here Ted Thompson will NOT draft based on need.

Here's why you don't draft for need. Once you have isolated your "needs" down to say two positions your focus narrows DRAMATICALLY to about two players at each position. Either this guy or that guy.

The entire rest of the field has been essentially eliminated from the process and the focus on this one draft pick coming up next is these one or two guys. It's FOOLISH.

Our former GM pulled this crap all the time and failed miserably. Back when we were in NEED of a DE he goes and picks Reynolds. Later when we were short at CB he takes what turns out to be a huge disaster. In fact, for good measure he picked ANOTHER CB next and HE turned out lousy too.

Your odds of failure increase proportionally with the number of players or positions you take off the board. Why pick an OT or DT if you feel in all of the evaluation you've done for months points to this other player at another position as the one most likely to have a great career?

More than likely there will be many here not happy with how Ted Thompson works this coming draft which is kind of funny because this is when he's at his best.
"The train is leaving the station."
DakotaT
16 years ago

I think because we rarely draft for immediate need, but rather good picks that will pay off a few years down the road as the players develop. CB will probably be a need in a few years, at least for depth.

"warhawk" wrote:



I understand, but getting fit for the 3-4 seems like a bigger need right now. And Cullen Jenkins is the only prototype in our team for that DE position right now.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



There you go talking about what we "need" again and like has been said here Ted Thompson will NOT draft based on need.

Here's why you don't draft for need. Once you have isolated your "needs" down to say two positions your focus narrows DRAMATICALLY to about two players at each position. Either this guy or that guy.

The entire rest of the field has been essentially eliminated from the process and the focus on this one draft pick coming up next is these one or two guys. It's FOOLISH.

Our former GM pulled this crap all the time and failed miserably. Back when we were in NEED of a DE he goes and picks Reynolds. Later when we were short at CB he takes what turns out to be a huge disaster. In fact, for good measure he picked ANOTHER CB next and HE turned out lousy too.

Your odds of failure increase proportionally with the number of players or positions you take off the board. Why pick an OT or DT if you feel in all of the evaluation you've done for months points to this other player at another position as the one most likely to have a great career?

More than likely there will be many here not happy with how Ted Thompson works this coming draft which is kind of funny because this is when he's at his best.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:




War, he can draft BPA, but he neeeeds to pick up a couple lineman in Free Agency. We can't go into next season without beefing up DE and OT.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
16 years ago
Yup Dakota......both of our lines HAVE to be fixed, or it will be another long season ahead.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
16 years ago
I don't disagree that both lines need some attention. My point is that ROOKIES coming in and asked to start is not a business model for success.

Again, you work your rookies in and gradually increase their PT until they can play at a level that your team needs them at in order to be successful.

Yes, we all hear of the instant success stories and players that contribute at a high level in their first year. For every one of those are ten guys going through growing pains and having to learn the teams system, proper techniques, and the speed of the NFL game.

In other words if we had two or even three first round picks I don't think you plug their names in and say "SB here we come." Those guys will contribute much more to SB victories down the line.

This especially holds true for both the O and D lineman. Any NFL Line coach will tell you it takes that first year to get up to speed and the biggest improvements will be seen between year one and two.

Hell, the best defensive lineman on the Steelers got cut like twice before he finally started to show he was a player and Mario Williams basically sucked his first year before he got it and now he's everything they thought he would be. It should not be forgotten that these rookies, as good as they may be, are boys up against mature men with every possible trick in the book.
"The train is leaving the station."
RaiderPride
16 years ago

I don't disagree that both lines need some attention. My point is that ROOKIES coming in and asked to start is not a business model for success.

Again, you work your rookies in and gradually increase their PT until they can play at a level that your team needs them at in order to be successful.

"warhawk" wrote:



This is exactly why when I see a post by Warhawk I click and read it twice and slowly.

It makes me a more wise and knowledgeable football fan.

+ 1

R.P.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
PackFanWithTwins
16 years ago
While it would be nice to have the players to be able to let a rookie learn for a year before being expected to contribute. That isn't always possible. The team needs to have the players as starters for this to be possible, and I think there are a couple glaring holes that need to have somebody come in.

Sure a FA or two could take care of that allowing the draft picks to mature. But there are situations where that isn't possible. It would be nice for the early picks to have the talent to play day 1.

If we could get lucky like we did with Clifton and Tauscher and get a couple players that can get thrown in and produce for years to come.

I know, when dreaming Dream big.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Fan Shout
beast (1h) : Yeah, and I enjoyed your comments and just attempted to add to it. Sorry if I did it incorrectly.
wpr (3h) : Beast I never said Henderson was the salt of the earth. Nor even that he was correct. Just quoting the guy.
Zero2Cool (5h) : What did you do??
Zero2Cool (5h) : Whoa
beast (5h) : OMG the website is now all white, even some white on white text
beast (6h) : Henderson, who admits to taking cocaine during the Super Bowl against the Steelers, might dislike Bradshaw as he lost two Superbowls to him
wpr (28-May) : Hollywood Henderson said Bradshaw “is so dumb, he couldn't spell 'cat' if you spotted him the C and an A.”
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : Cooper stock=BUY BUY BUY
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : Also notes he’s playing with more confidence.
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : @AndyHermanNFL MLF says there was a time last year where Cooper was at 220 pounds. Now he’s at 240 and still flying around.
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : And don't even get me started on Frank Caliendos "impersonations"
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : I got tired of them being circle jerks with them overlaughing at each others jokes.
Zero2Cool (28-May) : It used to be must watch TV for me. now it's "meh" maybe to hear injury update
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : I haven't watched the pregame shows in years and I don't feel like I've missed a thing
Zero2Cool (28-May) : Love says knee affected him all season, groin injury didn't help matters.
Zero2Cool (28-May) : I used to enjoy him on FOX Pregame. Now it's like a frat party of former Patriots.
Zero2Cool (28-May) : LaFleur on Watson: “Christian is doing outstanding. I would say he’s ahead of schedule.”
Martha Careful (28-May) : Bradshaw is a dumb ass cracker. I am so tired of his "aw shucks" diatribe. He should shrivel up and go away.
buckeyepackfan (28-May) : He wad all butt hurt because Aaron duped the media saying he was immunized.
buckeyepackfan (28-May) : Bradshaw needs to retire. He's been ripping on Rodgers ever since the covid crap. He was all hury
Zero2Cool (28-May) : Terry Bradshaw doesn't want Rodgers in Pittsburgh lol wow
Zero2Cool (27-May) : one day contract, which he also feels is pointless, but if Packers came to him, he would
packerfanoutwest (27-May) : Aaron Rodgers talks possibility of retiring with Packers, just another rumor
dfosterf (27-May) : Go watch 2001
Zero2Cool (26-May) : 1984
dfosterf (26-May) : That movie sent a chill through many. 1968.
dfosterf (26-May) : "Open the pod bay doors, HAL"
buckeyepackfan (25-May) : Haven't we all seen thus movie? It doesn't end well!! Lol
Zero2Cool (25-May) : lol Anthropic’s new AI model turns to blackmail when engineers try to take it offline
dfosterf (25-May) : Claude Opus 4
dfosterf (25-May) : AI system resorts to blackmail when its developers threaten to take it offline
beast (22-May) : Colts Owner Jim Irsay has passed away
Zero2Cool (21-May) : Well, emailing should work now. After not working for almost a year. Oops.
Zero2Cool (21-May) : Brotherly Shove did not get enough votes.
Zero2Cool (20-May) : lol our email hasn't worked in months. 7 pages of unverified users
Zero2Cool (20-May) : MySpace Screaming Lord Byron ... Brett Favre.
Zero2Cool (19-May) : Packers have signed first-round pick Matthew Golden, leaving second-round tackle Anthony Belton as their only unsigned draft pick
beast (19-May) : Supposedly he has to take his image, and name off of it... but otherwise could keep selling wine if he wanted to.
Zero2Cool (19-May) : he giving up his win business?
beast (19-May) : Speaking of Woodson, sounds like he'll be a minority owner (0.1%) of the Browns
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Zero, regarding Woodson, that'd why I find the timing with Williams peculiar
dfosterf (15-May) : Ryan Hall y'all does a great job of tracking thesr
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Fear not!! I planned to do 33mi bike ride tomorrow morning, so ... yeah
Zero2Cool (15-May) : We got some dark clouds and nasty winds right bout now.
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Madison they had hail 4pm.
dfosterf (15-May) : Sure looks like these tornadoes are headed towards Green Bay
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Woodson of Charles fame was reluctant and then loved it. that didn't really come out until post career
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : IE "We bought into the Bears and they let us down, we have no choice to seek alternatives"
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Or that Williams and his family are preparing an exit ramp if they don't like how things are going in a few years
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Either Williams thought it would make him look good (reluctant but then embraces the city and franchise)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

27-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-May / Random Babble / Martha Careful

24-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

23-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

22-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

21-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

21-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

20-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.