I think because we rarely draft for immediate need, but rather good picks that will pay off a few years down the road as the players develop. CB will probably be a need in a few years, at least for depth.
"warhawk" wrote:
I understand, but getting fit for the 3-4 seems like a bigger need right now. And Cullen Jenkins is the only prototype in our team for that DE position right now.
"Packers_Finland" wrote:
There you go talking about what we "need" again and like has been said here Ted Thompson will NOT draft based on need.
Here's why you don't draft for need. Once you have isolated your "needs" down to say two positions your focus narrows DRAMATICALLY to about two players at each position. Either this guy or that guy.
The entire rest of the field has been essentially eliminated from the process and the focus on this one draft pick coming up next is these one or two guys. It's FOOLISH.
Our former GM pulled this crap all the time and failed miserably. Back when we were in NEED of a DE he goes and picks Reynolds. Later when we were short at CB he takes what turns out to be a huge disaster. In fact, for good measure he picked ANOTHER CB next and HE turned out lousy too.
Your odds of failure increase proportionally with the number of players or positions you take off the board. Why pick an OT or DT if you feel in all of the evaluation you've done for months points to this other player at another position as the one most likely to have a great career?
More than likely there will be many here not happy with how Ted Thompson works this coming draft which is kind of funny because this is when he's at his best.
"MassPackersFan" wrote: