Team/Draft Needs· Page 2

beast
Select Member Topic Starter

a year ago

This is incorrect about Odell. At least according to him. He wanted Rams. Packers didn't refuse to sign him either. That's a presumption made by the media because of the reported offer.

You can argue semantics about all in, whatever. But when you consider what Packers did via free agency years prior, I it certainly falls within the realm of all in.

All in for the other 31 teams? Eh yoh probably got a valid point haha. But for Packers, yeah, the phrase fits.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

You would know about arguing the semantics... have you realized it's a rebuild year yet?

No the Packers didn't refuse to sign him, they just simply lowed balled him to the point there was zero chance of him signing, just like when Gute chased Jordy Nelson, whom wanted to be resigned off.

https://www.sportskeeda.com/amp/nfl/news-the-reason-odell-beckham-jr-sign-packers-revealed

According to Adam Schefter of ESPN, the reason that Beckham Jr. decided to sign with the Rams and not the Packers was down to money. Schefter stated that the Packers did not offer Beckham Jr. a wage above the minimum veteran wage, which is $1.075 million for a full season.

Beckham wanted to play for the best team with the best QB, and at that time was the Packers, until the Packers wouldn't pay him.

You can try to rewrite history, just like trying to rewriting what Kurt Benkert said about LaFleaur, but no matter what the semantics says, or the Packers fans spin we want to put on it, these negative things actually did happen.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

a year ago

#12

You would know about arguing the semantics... have you realized it's a rebuild year yet?

Originally Posted by: beast

Odell wanted the Rams the entire time, sorry, it was a tough pill for Aaron Rodgers to swallow too. The Packers would likely have had to top the Rams offer by a decent margin for him to change his course. That's not arguing, that's not semantics, it's calling it like it is. If you can't handle that, then don't reply to me because I am really fed up with your condescending comments. I avoid coming here as frequently because I am sick of playing the "what bullshit is beast slinging at me today" game.

As for "rebuild", you need to really shut the fuck up already. I spoke my piece on it and said I don't understand the definition and the more people tried defining it, the less it seemed to fit my interpretation of what the Packers 2023 season is. I don't really care if it's called a rebuild, retool, renew or re-whatever. I couldn't care less. I have no idea why that crawls up your ass so much, but pull the stick out already. fucking sick of this

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

a year ago

#13

Patiently waiting for the "Julio Jones" thread to reappear since once again The Packers failed to sign him
🙃🙃🙃🙃

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

greengold
Member

a year ago

#14

Some people are still mad we didn't sign Randy Moss.

dhazer
Veteran Member

a year ago

#15

Im still mad the Packers didn't renegotiate Javon Walkers contract in which he forced a trade.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

9 months ago

#16

Im still mad the Packers didn't renegotiate Javon Walkers contract in which he forced a trade.

Originally Posted by: dhazer

Brett Favre said Javon Walker had the most talent out of any WR he played with. Granted, this was before he retired in 2007 so those few seasons after --- maybe someone new?

beast
Select Member Topic Starter

9 months ago

#17

Odell wanted the Rams the entire time, sorry

That's the complete opposite of what Odell said...

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

9 months ago

#18

That's the complete opposite of what Odell said...

Originally Posted by: beast

Yeah, it's not. The goal he had was Rams. Super Bowl. No cold. He was talking with guys on the Rams about joining, how he'd fit, etc. The Packers needed to come in with strong financial offer to sway him. They didn't. He didn't. Pretty straight forward. Not a big deal. It happens.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (2h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (3h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (10h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS