I don't know how much of the D problems will be solved by that, but i don't think it will hurt.
"mattresell" wrote:
I agree with this. I'm not opposed to the firing, because i think they can do better, but I also don't think Sanders was dragging down the defense or anything like that. I would've expected the defense to show substantial improvement next year with or without Sanders. Now, when (if) the defense does improve, much of that improvement will be attributed to the new DC, even if not necessarily justified. At any rate, it's a nice situation for a new DC to jump into. Plenty of talent and flexibility to work with.
"Cheesey" wrote: