Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
Cheesey
2 years ago

If they can get and stay healthy, yes, that's the enemy... injuries. If the OL, Tonyan, MVS and Dillon were healthy, we would of won the Super Bowl this year.

The question is will our team be healthy next year?

Originally Posted by: beast 



And the other question is will they be able to AFFORD the players we need
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

YOU stop it. Aaron is a 4 time MVP including the past 2 seasons. He's still got mad skills. What he needs is other players on the team to actually live up to their abilities as well. He should not have to throw the team on his back and trudge down the field.
Was he off in the SF playoff game? Yes but that was not your question. Does he have to play like Russell Wilson did a few years ago when he nearly brought the Seahawks back against GB? No. He shouldn't have to. Then again, the younger man, Wilson, didn't win that game did he? Rodgers should be able to play an average game for an NFL playoff QB and the team still win. Not be the superman on the team and win the game despite other players on the team failing.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I'm not saying put the team on his back. I'm saying be the difference in tilting the team to victory at home in your climate that you repeatedly wanted. He cannot do it alone, but he could have been the difference in the win. He wasn't the reason for the loss.

I don't know why this can be so difficult for some to comprehend. This isn't bashing Aaron Rodgers. This is merely posing my opinion that no longer can Aaron Rodgers tilt post-season games in favor for the Packers BASED ON what I've seen the last few years.

Do I want someone else as QB? Nope. I still want Aaron Rodgers, even if I feel he can't tilt the needle at home when it's horrible weather outside. You put this same 2021 team in a dome or warmer climate and I think Aaron Rodgers would be the difference and the Packers win.

It's that simple.
UserPostedImage
bboystyle
2 years ago

Of course he can. More likely now than in the past, because now he's got this defense backing him up.

His biggest obstacle is himself, though. Bringing back his long time sycophant Tom Clements, is unlikely to keep him running the actual offense.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 




Theres no guarantee this defense will perform the same or better. After the 2010 season, i thought we were set on defense with the young talent we had but then 2011 happened and onwards. It wasnt until 2014 we didnt field another defense worth a damn.Teams that pay their QB big $ usually dont have the pieces to field a consistently good defense (see seattle before they gave Russell his big contract).

Can he win one? Sure,if the team is good enough. QBs do not win games, teams do. You cant apply NBA hot takes onto a sport that is the ultimate team sport. So if our offense gets better,our defense stays the same abd our ST drastically get better then yea, Rodgers can win another ring.
bboystyle
2 years ago

I'm not saying put the team on his back. I'm saying be the difference in tilting the team to victory at home in your climate that you repeatedly wanted. He cannot do it alone, but he could have been the difference in the win. He wasn't the reason for the loss.

I don't know why this can be so difficult for some to comprehend. This isn't bashing Aaron Rodgers. This is merely posing my opinion that no longer can Aaron Rodgers tilt post-season games in favor for the Packers BASED ON what I've seen the last few years.

Do I want someone else as QB? Nope. I still want Aaron Rodgers, even if I feel he can't tilt the needle at home when it's horrible weather outside. You put this same 2021 team in a dome or warmer climate and I think Aaron Rodgers would be the difference and the Packers win.

It's that simple.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




Well said. And without our running game being consistently good, we do not have the pieces to win in cold weather on offense. We dont have a Deebo on our squad.

This offense,as of now, is built more for dome turf and warm weather.
beast
2 years ago

And the other question is will they be able to AFFORD the players we need

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Of course, the only problem is they're not paying me 😉
UserPostedImage
Pugger
2 years ago

I also think he can. But not on his own. They have to find a way to keep their best players, and add to the team to shore up the weak points.
That will be very hard to do considering the salary cap.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



No QB can win it on his own, not even Brady could. It will be interesting to see if Rodgers wants to return. From his speech at the NFL honors it appears he likes his HC and has mended fences with Murphy and Gute. Even is old QB whisperer Tom Clements has returned. Aaron Rodgers has 3 choices here. One is retirement and I just don't see that happening. The other is returning with perhaps an extension to manipulate the cap. The other is to sweet talk Gute into trading him to another team. I suspect he will return but who knows...? 🤔
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
2 years ago

I'm not saying put the team on his back. I'm saying be the difference in tilting the team to victory at home in your climate that you repeatedly wanted. He cannot do it alone, but he could have been the difference in the win. He wasn't the reason for the loss.

I don't know why this can be so difficult for some to comprehend. This isn't bashing Aaron Rodgers. This is merely posing my opinion that no longer can Aaron Rodgers tilt post-season games in favor for the Packers BASED ON what I've seen the last few years.

Do I want someone else as QB? Nope. I still want Aaron Rodgers, even if I feel he can't tilt the needle at home when it's horrible weather outside. You put this same 2021 team in a dome or warmer climate and I think Aaron Rodgers would be the difference and the Packers win.

It's that simple.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I know what you are saying. I know you are not bashing Rodgers.
That said, "Putting the team on his back" and "tilting the game in your favor" are nearly the same thing even if you don't think so. It's the QB rising up and overcoming other problems the team is facing and winning despite the other shortcomings.
Very few QBs have that ability. Very few QBs can do it all their career. The Packers have been a "dome" type team for years. Going back to Favre, it has been this way. They might win a cold weather game but they have lost plenty of them too.
bboystle mentioned the missing running game. Part of that was Dillon's injury. Part of that was the failure of the OL to block in the running game.
If Lewis and Deguara had caught their passes Aaron may not have felt Adams was their only hope. It may have thrown the ball to the open receiver who was running a shorter crossing route instead of trying to force the deep route that was double teamed. You know the pattern that has almost no chance of success.
Completions on the drop passes keeps the drive alive and they may have scored. It may have only been FGs (Another chuckle) but that would have been 6 more points. The Last Drive going to the underneath receiver also could have worked out well scoring points or at the very least forcing a tie and not leaving SF with time until OT. All these failures by other players would have given Rodgers the perception of tilting the field. His QB rating would have probably been over 100 again and all would have been right with the world.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

I know what you are saying. I know you are not bashing Rodgers.
That said, "Putting the team on his back" and "tilting the game in your favor" are nearly the same thing even if you don't think so. It's the QB rising up and overcoming other problems the team is facing and winning despite the other shortcomings.
Very few QBs have that ability. Very few QBs can do it all their career. The Packers have been a "dome" type team for years. Going back to Favre, it has been this way. They might win a cold weather game but they have lost plenty of them too.
bboystle mentioned the missing running game. Part of that was Dillon's injury. Part of that was the failure of the OL to block in the running game.
If Lewis and Deguara had caught their passes Aaron may not have felt Adams was their only hope. It may have thrown the ball to the open receiver who was running a shorter crossing route instead of trying to force the deep route that was double teamed. You know the pattern that has almost no chance of success.
Completions on the drop passes keeps the drive alive and they may have scored. It may have only been FGs (Another chuckle) but that would have been 6 more points. The Last Drive going to the underneath receiver also could have worked out well scoring points or at the very least forcing a tie and not leaving SF with time until OT. All these failures by other players would have given Rodgers the perception of tilting the field. His QB rating would have probably been over 100 again and all would have been right with the world.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I mentioned the loss of Dillon hurting.

As for the OL. I am still pissed off it appears they shuffled things around. Why the hell was Billy Turner at LT? They did the same BS last year vs Buccaneers didn't they?

The Packers need to have a better supporting cast because the QB can't tilt it in their favor. How can we do that if he consumes $50 million of cap space? I haven't a clue and sure as hell glad my dork ass don't have that duty, lol.

I'm still in the boat of giving Aaron something like 10 year $200 million contract that's guaranteed. Once playing career is done, he transitions into face of franchise kind of thing and still pockets the cash. And Packers can spread that cash throughout a decade. Seems like a win-win, except for the whole inflation thing, haha.

Yes, when players drop passes it sucks. Aaron has said himself he is OK with drops unless it's a MENTAL issue. He feels mental issues are preventable. You still need to hit the open guy and move the chains. I can't say he didn't do that a lot, but there were a few times while at the game I saw someone open and he forced it to 17. I was freezing my ass off and could see someone breaking free. I also had the luxury of not having 300 lb men wanting to smash by balls down my throat. My point is simply this. He has to trust his guys on the field. If he can't do that, he needs to retire. They got you that far, trust them to take you the rest of the way. I am NOT saying he doesn't, but it's hard to argue against it with how often he forced it to 17 who was covered well.
UserPostedImage
Pugger
2 years ago

Aaron Rodgers does not play Special Teams, but if the Packers can't score more than 13 points at home in a playoff game, they do not deserve to advance. The loss of AJ Dillon is something I believe really hurt the Packers. That being said, the NFL MVP should have been able to lead an offense to more than 13 points at home in the playoffs in the climate they so badly wanted.

Aaron Rodgers isn't why the Packers loss, but he could have been the reason they won and wasn't. That's what I'm talking about with this thread. He won't be why we lose, but it doesn't seem like he's going to be why win either.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



The 49ers offense only scored 6 points in that game so if we go with your kind of thinking SF didn't deserve to advance either.

It doesn't matter how many points you score as long as you win. Unfortunately our ST gave up a TD and blocked a FG and that was the difference in the game. Let's hope our new ST coordinator can help fix this mess so this unit is not the worst in the league again in 2022.

Zero2Cool
2 years ago

The 49ers offense only scored 6 points in that game so if we go with your kind of thinking SF didn't deserve to advance either.

It doesn't matter how many points you score as long as you win. Unfortunately our ST gave up a TD and blocked a FG and that was the difference in the game. Let's hope our new ST coordinator can help fix this mess so this unit is not the worst in the league again in 2022.

Originally Posted by: Pugger 



You're taking a portion of my point and twisting into something nonexistent to my point.

The 49ers weren't the home team. They didn't get the climate they wanted. They didn't have Special Teams issues all season they knew they had to overcome. And on and on.

The Packers offense failed. You cannot convince me otherwise. They had everything how they wanted and needed. They failed. Defense did their part. Special Teams was the same trash as it has been. The offense is what underperformed and failed.

It happens. That's why the NFL is a juggernaut for viewership. Any. Given. Sunday.

Or Saturday in this case lol
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (42m) : Kanata, seek help! lol
beast (2h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (3h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (3h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (3h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (3h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (3h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (3h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (4h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (4h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (5h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (7h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (14h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (15h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (22h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (22h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (23h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
43m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.