Will Aaron Rodgers make 4000 yards this season?· Page 6

zombieslayer
Registered

15 years ago

It was a good game. The Lions didn't lay down they fought all the way.
I was SO glad to see Rodgers get 4000, and Driver his 1000. Both deserved it.
28 TD;s and 13 int's. Not too bad for a 1st year starter.

"Cheesey" wrote:

Wow. This year, I got just about every Packers prediction wrong except for one:

I said Aaron Rodgers will be better than Peyton Manning in '08. 28 TDs/13 INTs vs 27 TDs/12 INTs for Manning, but Rodgers arguably had the better year - really good rushing stats. Manning had a much better OL. I don't think anyone with any brains would say the Packers' OL is any good.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#52

I think our defense did pretty well today. They limited the Lions running "attack".

Congrats to Aaron! Our offense is in great shape - now if we can bolster that defense we should be all set for an entertaining 2009 season!

"joym13" wrote:

No, we need to get better on our first drives...Our offensive line needs some shoring up as well.

longtimefan
Registered

15 years ago

#53

I think he will. If Mike McCarthy will let the kid throw the damn ball!!!

"dhazer" wrote:

We don't agree on shit but i'm 100% with you on this one. We will have the lead by 3 with 8 minutes left and Rodgers sitting at 3999 and Mike McCarthy will call run plays for the rest of the game, Until we are down with 10 seconds left and Rodgers has to throw a hail mary.

+1 to you cheesey :thumbright:

btw the way did anyone else notice roddy oops i mean toddy thinks Rodgers would be benched which i think would be very stupid on Mike McCarthy's part causing more off season bs, and adding fuel to the fire.

"Cheesey" wrote:

whats Bretts rating last 5 or 6 games since your so hyped up on Aaron Rodgers stats for last 5 mins?

BTW

Brett tossed an int with 502 to go

porky88
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#54

Statistically Rodgers has had an excellent season and I think it's safe to say he's an effective QB. I assume he'll play up to the caliber of a Matt Hasselbeck and a Mark Brunnell. Arguably he could be better.

http://www.row12.com/

joym13
Registered

15 years ago

#55

I think our defense did pretty well today. They limited the Lions running "attack".

Congrats to Aaron! Our offense is in great shape - now if we can bolster that defense we should be all set for an entertaining 2009 season!

"go.pack.go." wrote:

No, we need to get better on our first drives...Our offensive line needs some shoring up as well.

"joym13" wrote:

Oh - I do agree with that! But even with our half - a$$ offensive line, they were able to score. So I'm hoping that OL gets shored up and the defense gets revamped.

blank

ChilliMaddensChilli
Registered

15 years ago

#56

After watching that Jets game I'm really glad we traded favre

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#57

14-3 is NOT a commanding league.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

I find this typo amusing. I find it even more amusing that it took me this long to notice it.

And I hope I'm not the only one who was not surprised when the Lions came back from a 14-point deficit -- thereby proving my point.

At least for this team, no lead was safe this season.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#58

I think our defense did pretty well today. They limited the Lions running "attack".

Congrats to Aaron! Our offense is in great shape - now if we can bolster that defense we should be all set for an entertaining 2009 season!

"joym13" wrote:

No, we need to get better on our first drives...Our offensive line needs some shoring up as well.

"go.pack.go." wrote:

Oh - I do agree with that! But even with our half - a$$ offensive line, they were able to score. So I'm hoping that OL gets shored up and the defense gets revamped.

"joym13" wrote:

But it's unacceptable to allow like 3 sacks a game...(just a guess, didn't look anything up, but that sounds about right)

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#59

But it's unacceptable to allow like 3 sacks a game...(just a guess, didn't look anything up, but that sounds about right)

"go.pack.go." wrote:

You're half right. We were told at the beginning of the season that the line would give up more sacks this year because Rodgers was being instructed to take sacks rather than risking interceptions by attempting to force plays. That's exactly what has happened.

4PackGirl
Registered

15 years ago

#60

14-3 is NOT a commanding league.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

hmmm...a freudian slip, perhaps?

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (9h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (9h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (9h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (13h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (13h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (13h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (15h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (15h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (15h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (15h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (15h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (15h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (15h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (15h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (16h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (17h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (17h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (17h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (17h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (18h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (18h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (18h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (19h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (19h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (19h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (21h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (21h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (21h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (21h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (22h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (22h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (22h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (22h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (22h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (22h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (22h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (22h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (22h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (22h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (22h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (22h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS