I have been leaning strongly towards AD or AP or Adrian Peterson, whatever they call him these days, but in a bit of ironic twist, the Purple folk here on this board have reminded me via a pi$$ing contest between them and the Grizz that the Vikes do not really skip that big of a beat without him. Down in the back alley, the Grizz pointed out that AD has been missing some practice. The purple folk point to Chester Taylor, and further point out that he brings some things to the table that AP/AD/pain in my a$$ does not. I think they have a very valid argument, but now my question to myself is this... As much as I have been leaning towards PIMA being the MVP, should I devalue that opinion if he is virtually interchangeable with Chester Taylor, or further, if Chester can bring more to the table than PIMA?
(PIMA=pain in my ass, for those that didn't quite catch the transition :icon_smile: )