yooperfan
3 years ago

As with Aaron Jones's contract, the real number will be less. I don't trust King on my team, but he's a place holder. We'll draft at least one CB, and don't forget Josh Jackson. He held up decently last year, and this defense is 80% zone, which plays to his strength.

It strengthens our position going into the draft.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


6 million dollars for a “ place holder “, a “ warm body “.
That’s pretty sad 😔

nerdmann
3 years ago

Nope, none of that is true.

Jones real numbers aren't less, unless you mean the cap number, and that's only because the signing bonus spreads the life over the contract.

King's deal is reportedly a one year deal (unless there is voidable fake years built in, which allowed), so even if the signing bonus is spread over the life of the contract, it's still all in one year.

And the last two years the Packers have been running mostly zone coverage, so just because the new system is heavy in zone doesn't nessarily change anything.

And Josh Jackson freaking sucked last year, so much the Packers started making him a healthy scratch towards the end of the season and in the playoffs.

You don't healthy scratch a good player at a very important position, where you also seriously lack of depth.

Originally Posted by: beast 


Jones numbers are what, $14 per year? Iirc his cap hit the first two years are $4 and $10. So that's less than $14. If you are talking about less than King's contract, the $10 would be more, the $4 would be less.

King's deal is $6, but we haven't seen the "real number" on that.

Jackson held up just fine, he had a bad play were he ran step for step to the end zone and got flagged for not turning his head.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
3 years ago

Jones numbers are what, $14 per year? Iirc his cap hit the first two years are $4 and $10. So that's less than $14. If you are talking about less than King's contract, the $10 would be more, the $4 would be less.

King's deal is $6, but we haven't seen the "real number" on that.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Actually you have it backwards... the cap numbers are the fake accounting numbers designed to spread the hits out over time.

If it's a one year deal, then by definition that is the real number, Dollar and Cap. Unless there are incentives involved.

The "real numbers" are what a player actually is getting paid. And the real because by design the fake accounting numbers follows the real one.

Aaron Jones is getting paid an average of $12 million per season.

Aaron Jones REAL paid per year
2021: $14,250,000 ($14,250,000)
2022: $5,750,000 ($20,000,000)
2023: $16,000,000 ($36,000,000)
2024: $12,000,000 ($48,000,000)

Aaron Jones Cap Hit per Year.
2021: $4,500,000
2022: $9,000,000
2023: $19,250,000
2024: $15,250,000

The reason these numbers are fake, are because they spread out the $13 million signing bonus equally, at $3.25 million per year. When in REALITY, Jones pockets all that money in 2021.

Which explains Jones 2021 cap hit. $3.25 million prorated signing bonus + $1 million base salary + $200k roster bonus + $50k workout bonus = $4.5 Cap Accountings Number.

But in reality, Jones bank account gets $14,250,000 and if you release him after this year, you'd have a $9,750,000 dead cap space making up the difference next year.

Jackson held up just fine, he had a bad play were he ran step for step to the end zone and got flagged for not turning his head.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

If by fine, you mean his ass got told stay in street cloths while we really needed a player at his position to step up...

King clearly out played him. Which is while even when King struggled, Jackson didn't even suit up toward the end of the season.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
3 years ago

Actually you have it backwards... the cap numbers are the fake accounting numbers designed to spread the hits out over time.

If it's a one year deal, then by definition that is the real number, Dollar and Cap. Unless there are incentives involved.

The "real numbers" are what a player actually is getting paid. And the real because by design the fake accounting numbers follows the real one.

Aaron Jones is getting paid an average of $12 million per season.

Aaron Jones REAL paid per year
2021: $14,250,000 ($14,250,000)
2022: $5,750,000 ($20,000,000)
2023: $16,000,000 ($36,000,000)
2024: $12,000,000 ($48,000,000)

Aaron Jones Cap Hit per Year.
2021: $4,500,000
2022: $9,000,000
2023: $19,250,000
2024: $15,250,000

The reason these numbers are fake, are because they spread out the $13 million signing bonus equally, at $3.25 million per year. When in REALITY, Jones pockets all that money in 2021.

Which explains Jones 2021 cap hit. $3.25 million prorated signing bonus + $1 million base salary + $200k roster bonus + $50k workout bonus = $4.5 Cap Accountings Number.

But in reality, Jones bank account gets $14,250,000 and if you release him after this year, you'd have a $9,750,000 dead cap space making up the difference next year.

If by fine, you mean his ass got told stay in street cloths while we really needed a player at his position to step up...

King clearly out played him. Which is while even when King struggled, Jackson didn't even suit up toward the end of the season.

Originally Posted by: beast 


Word is, King's real number is $4.

And yeah. How much a player gets, doesn't matter to us at all. What's the relevance? What matters to the team is the cap number.

Video. I agree King isn't bad, but I felt like he tanked the Championship. I don't trust him anymore. And btw, both King and Alexander need to hit the jugs machine. These two drop more INTs than most players make.




“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
3 years ago

Word is, King's real number is $4.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Please cite a source, that there is actually word of this, thank you.

And yeah. How much a player gets, doesn't matter to us at all. What's the relevance? What matters to the team is the cap number.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

What you fail to comprehend is how much a player gets paid is exectly equal to the players cap number...

So if the cap matters, then what a player gets absolutely does matter. Because all the cap is doing is following the actual real money amount they're getting. It's just delayed a bit by spreading out the signing bonus.

The money is real and can't be manipulated. The cap is just a non-real system for tracking the money, and can be manipulated, which is what they're doing by spreading this out.

So how much money a player pockets absolutely matters if you care about the cap, because honestly, that's all it is. Spreading out how much they pocketed.

The cap is how much money did the player got. Except the amount they got is more correct.

UserPostedImage
nerdmann
3 years ago

Please cite a source, that there is actually word of this, thank you.
What you fail to comprehend is how much a player gets paid is exectly equal to the players cap number...

So if the cap matters, then what a player gets absolutely does matter. Because all the cap is doing is following the actual real money amount they're getting. It's just delayed a bit by spreading out the signing bonus.

The money is real and can't be manipulated. The cap is just a non-real system for tracking the money, and can be manipulated, which is what they're doing by spreading this out.

So how much money a player pockets absolutely matters if you care about the cap, because honestly, that's all it is. Spreading out how much they pocketed.

The cap is how much money did the player got. Except the amount they got is more correct.

Originally Posted by: beast 


Indeed. Which is why they would rather pay Jones $4 this year and $10 next year 🤣
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
3 years ago

Indeed. Which is why they would rather pay Jones $4 this year and $10 next year 🤣

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


I'm sure that's what they rather do, but that's not relevant... as here is the pay there agreed to, and they have to account for, weather you understand the process or not.


Aaron Jones REAL paid per year
2021: $14,250,000 ($14,250,000)
2022: $5,750,000 ($20,000,000)
2023: $16,000,000 ($36,000,000)
2024: $12,000,000 ($48,000,000)

Originally Posted by: beast 



Also, I see once again, you have failed to back up your statements with any proof. So I'm starting to think when you say people are saying something, that's code for your making stuff up.

Everything seems to suggest King contract is a one year, $6 million dollar deal.

If that's the case, then his cap number is $6 million, unless they add fake voidable years or some fo the $6 millions is incentives that he doesn't earn.


UserPostedImage
nerdmann
3 years ago
The team has money. They all do. But they have to fit it under the cap. And btw, Jones has incentives too.

Here's Rodney's conjecture  on King's contract. If I have time I'll post some others.

More conjecture as to King's real numbers:



“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
nerdmann
3 years ago
This person does not suggest a number, but he suggests there will be incentives and that the $6 isn't fully guaranteed.



“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
3 years ago

The team has money. They all do. But they have to fit it under the cap.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Yes, and the Cap follows what? The actual money... it's just spread out differently.

And as the Packers and other teams have shown, the Cap can be manipulated, to spread out the money even further.

And btw, Jones has incentives too.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Jones contract according to spotrac has signing bonus, roster bonus, and per game active bonus. It doesn't appear to have any what are normally considered incentives.

Preston Smith has sack incentives. Not sure Aaron Jones does, unless you count the per game active roster bonuses, or spotrac made an error.


Here's Rodney's conjecture  on King's contract. If I have time I'll post some others.

More conjecture as to King's real numbers:


Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


Thank you for posting a source 🙂

Rodney talks there their would have to be voidable year (just like I did). Though you have to realize, the amount would still be $6 million, just it'd be spread out over two years instead of one. But I have no problem with what Rodney said, he's right. Those the real number would still be the whole among, just spread out differently.

The other guy, and talking all about opinions of what he thinks it should be... that's an opinion, not anything inside sourced.

Though he could be right, I just have not seen anyone with known connections actually say that yet.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (13m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (13m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (13m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (21m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (22m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (42m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (3h) : Packers will get in
beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.