Cheesey
6 years ago
First, I don’t believe he didn’t know he was in the end zone. If he didn’t, he should not have been on the kick off return team in the first place.

I think he was just trying to make a play. Maybe to be able to say “see? You NEED me!”
Had he got past the 25 and not fumbled the ball, it would have been a good play.
But he screwed up BIG time.
There were many other times during the game where plays could have been made that were missed that could have won the game for us.
This stands out because it was at a crucial time when we still could have won.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
6 years ago

Had he got past the 25 and not fumbled the ball, it would have been a good play.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 


No, it wouldn't have been, because that still would have cost Green Bay the opportunity to run a play before the two-minute warning, without any additional benefit. There is arguably no outcome that would have made his decision a good one; it was just statistically the wrong move from every imaginable angle. Even if he had managed to score on the return, it would still have been the wrong decision: first, because it was such a high-risk-low-reward move; and second, because it would have put the ball back in the hands of the high-powered Rams offense with about 1:45 on the clock and needing just a touchdown to win it.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
6 years ago

No, it wouldn't have been, because that still would have cost Green Bay the opportunity to run a play before the two-minute warning, without any additional benefit. There is arguably no outcome that would have made his decision a good one; it was just statistically the wrong move from every imaginable angle. Even if he had managed to score on the return, it would still have been the wrong decision: first, because it was such a high-risk-low-reward move; and second, because it would have put the ball back in the hands of the high-powered Rams offense with about 1:45 on the clock and needing just a touchdown to win it.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



We all know it was gonna get called back anyway.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Nonstopdrivel
6 years ago

We all know it was gonna get called back anyway.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


I'll admit it: that made me 😂 🤣 [giddity] [bdance]
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

No, it wouldn't have been, because that still would have cost Green Bay the opportunity to run a play before the two-minute warning, without any additional benefit. There is arguably no outcome that would have made his decision a good one; it was just statistically the wrong move from every imaginable angle. Even if he had managed to score on the return, it would still have been the wrong decision: first, because it was such a high-risk-low-reward move; and second, because it would have put the ball back in the hands of the high-powered Rams offense with about 1:45 on the clock and needing just a touchdown to win it.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Listening to Ty's comments at his locker yesterday, I am starting to lean towards he went rogue. He says he was told if the ball is in the end zone, don't return it. Then he says he stood where he always stands and didn't want to kneel on the half yard line, claiming he didn't know where he was. Look, if you stand 3 yards deep in the end zone every single time, how do you not know where the hell you are?

I want to believe that Mike Silver fabricated his anonymous source because that kind of fracture in a locker room is terrible, but Ty's comments make me think he did it on his own accord, or at least shouldn't be back there. He also admitted to being upset for being taken out of the game and also mentioned he's sacrificing pay by doing multiple roles instead of just one. Kind of all adds up to he did just "do him".
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
6 years ago
He brought up sacrificing pay? I'm mean... he's a hybrid player on a rookie contract. He's auditioning for his next contract. I don't understand his mentality. I don't know him personally, but he doesn't seem to have proper recognition of what his role is. He's not a lead RB, he's not a QB, he's not a premier pass rusher or a left tackle, therefore he needs to do everything he can to excel in the roles he's given to have a chance at a new deal with whatever team gives him a shot.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
beast
6 years ago

Listening to Ty's comments at his locker yesterday, I am starting to lean towards he went rogue. He says he was told if the ball is in the end zone, don't return it. Then he says he stood where he always stands and didn't want to kneel on the half yard line, claiming he didn't know where he was. Look, if you stand 3 yards deep in the end zone every single time, how do you not know where the hell you are?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

I think you misunderstood his quote... he was orginal standing inside the field of play (I assume the the half yard line), which is what he's talking about when he said he always lines up there, not 3 yards deep.

He did his job correctly, until he looked up for the ball and lined it up... based on his story he didn't mental realize he took a couple steps backwards when lining himself up to catch the kick.

I certainly can't tell you if it's true or not, but people lose awareness in the heat of the the moment all the time so it's at least possible...


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

I think you misunderstood his quote... he was orginal standing inside the field of play (I assume the the half yard line), which is what he's talking about when he said he always lines up there, not 3 yards deep.

He did his job correctly, until he looked up for the ball and lined it up... based on his story he didn't mental realize he took a couple steps backwards when lining himself up to catch the kick.

I certainly can't tell you if it's true or not, but people lose awareness in the heat of the the moment all the time so it's at least possible...

Originally Posted by: beast 



Fair enough, but you misunderstood my point. Which was using an example, an arbitrary depth inside the end zone (I should have stated as such more clearly). If you are standing in the same spot every time (5 yard line, 5 yards deep, wherever), how is it you do not know where you are? That's the part I'm still not understanding.

If you are on the goal line and you step back to receive the kick, you're in the end zone.

Better yet, stand on the goal line and if you have to move forward, you return it, if not, you let the ball hit the end zone because with the new rule, it's dead the second it hits the end zone.

I hate what Ty is going through from a few asshole fans, but he made a mistake, no question about it.
UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago

If you are standing in the same spot every time (5 yard line, 5 yards deep, wherever), how is it you do not know where you are? That's the part I'm still not understanding.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

My guess is his mind went into autopilot mode and was solely focused and zoned in on catching the ball...

He mentally thought he took steps to the side to adjest to the ball when in reality he took steps both to the slide and backwards at the same time.

Have you never mentally focused so hard on one thing, that you forgot another?
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

My guess is his mind went into autopilot mode and was solely focused and zoned in on catching the ball...

He mentally thought he took steps to the side to adjust to the ball when in reality he took steps both to the slide and backwards at the same time.

Have you never mentally focused so hard on one thing, that you forgot another?

Originally Posted by: beast 



I didn't catch the part where he said he mentally thought he took steps to the side and it was steps backward.

He made a mistake. I was inclined to believe Mike Silver was bullshiting us, until hearing Ty's comments -- which I need to listen to in full. I think he knew what was he was doing. He isn't stupid. He was trying to make a play when he should have just let the ball bounce into the end zone. It's a shame he's not perfect like the rest of us.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (2h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (2h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (2h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (9h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (11h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (11h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (12h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (13h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.