Roster Turnover· Page 2

gbguy20
Veteran Member

6 years ago

Maybe semantics, but are you wanting to know who was on opening day roster in 2005 vs opening day roster 2007?

Only asking because I saw one of these comparisons that said the end of season roster vs X roster was totally different, yet they omitted the injured reserve players as if they were no longer on the team as part of a roster turnover.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Correct on both

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#12

Maybe semantics, but are you wanting to know who was on opening day roster in 2005 vs opening day roster 2007?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I'm going off the rosters as listed on Pro Football Reference, which I'm assuming are the opening-day rosters. Obviously, we can't give the general manager credit for intraseason turnover caused by injuries and so on.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#13

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

I don't think so because McKenzie and Sullivan were part of the same trade, so they couldn't be on the Packers roster at the same time.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#14

I dropped a line to the editors of PFR to inquire about the specifics of the roster listings on their website. Once I know more about their methodology, I'll let you know.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#15

With the caveat that I don't fully understand PFR's methodology, here is the list of the 21 players from the 2005 roster who were still listed on the roster in 2007. Of these, 10 were acquired by Thompson sometime in 2005, while 11 were on the 2004 roster. All but four were still on the roster in 2008.

Aaron Kampman*
Aaron Rodgers
Al Harris*
Atari Bigby
Brady Poppinga
Brett Favre*^
Bubba Franks*^
Chad Clifton*
Colin Cole*
Corey Williams*^
Cullen Jenkins
Donald Driver*
Donald Lee
Junius Coston
Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila
Mark Tauscher*
Mike Montgomery
Nick Barnett*
Nick Collins
Rob Davis*^
Scott Wells*

*On the 2004 roster.
^Not on the 2008 roster.

Incidentally, does anyone know if Torey Humphrey was on injured reserve in 2007? He's listed on the rosters for 2005, 2006, and 2008 but not 2007. Similarly, Craig Nall is listed on the roster in 2004 and 2007, but not the years in between. Did he spend those seasons on the practice squad?

gbguy20
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#16

Not surprised by many of those names. 13 of the 21 were starters during that time, so it seems red must have swapped out every single depth guy we had. Also how do I not remember the name Mike Montgomery if he lasted on that list?

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#17

A glance at his stat line will probably tell you why your memory of him is a little fuzzy. 😁

wpr
Preferred Member

6 years ago

#18

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

Humphrey suffered a broken arm during training camp on August 7, 2009 after being hit by safety Aaron Rouse. Humphrey underwent successful surgery following the injury, but was ruled out by head coach Mike McCarthy for the rest of the 2009 season

wiki

In 2006, Craig Nall signed as an unrestricted free agent with the Buffalo Bills, where he competed for the starting quarterback position until a hamstring injury suffered on the second day of practice ended his involvement in the competition. In 2007, he fell on the team's depth chart behind J. P. Losman and Trent Edwards. At the end of pre-season, he was cut from the team's final roster. Early into the regular season he was re-signed by the Bills but was released shortly thereafter.

First stint with Texans
On October 29, 2007, Nall was signed by the Houston Texans as insurance when starter Matt Schaub was hurt against San Diego. He was released by the Texans on November 21, 2007.

Second stint with Packers
He signed a one-year deal with the Packers on December 1, 2007, after they released Marviel Underwood. He became a free agent in the 2008 offseason.

also wiki

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#19

For past seasons, team rosters reflect anyone who appeared in at least one game for the team at any point in the season. For current season pages, we'll show anyone on the roster at that given time plus players who've appeared in a game for the team earlier in the season.

S-R Bugs wrote:

I feel like such an idiot now. I did wonder if that is possibly what they were doing, but I never took the time to count the rosters to make sure they only listed 53 players. If every player who appeared on the roster at any point during the season is listed, then of course turnover is going to look really high. 😊

I wish I knew of a source for NFL opening-day rosters by year.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (6m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (52m) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (52m) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (52m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS