wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
6 years ago


Ty Montgomery is arguably the Packers’ biggest mystery.
A year ago, he went from the team’s featured running back to being forgotten when rookies Jamaal Williams and Aaron Jones ran with their opportunity by showcasing a burst, wiggle and power that wasn’t present with Montgomery.
So what to do with a guy that transformed his body into a muscled Humvee? You turn him into a tight end.
This will be Monty’s fourth season and another position switch will be his third. That’s a big ask for a guy that was drafted as a wide receiver out of Stanford in the third round in 2015.
But Montgomery is the ultimate X-factor: he doesn’t have a selfish bone in his body and is writing a manual on how to be the perfect player. He could’ve complained about changing his position to running back, but that didn’t happen. Heck, he even went to coach Mike McCarthy and suggested being the running back. How many guys would not only propose that but also go along with it by transforming their body with added bulk to take more of a pounding? The answer is not many.
“I ask a lot of questions. I’ve always been that way, said Montgomery during his rookie training camp. “I want to make sure I understand everything and I want to understand why everything is the way it is.”
Montgomery is a breath of fresh air in an era of look-at-me touchdown charades and guys demanding that they get the ball.
Tight end would be the final move for Montgomery. It fills a desperate need for the Packers after the absence of Martellus Bennett, who went completely sideways last year.
And it will also save the Packers anywhere from $4-$7 million over the next three years if they chose to get Austin Seferian-Jenkins or Jimmy Graham in free agency.
The best reason is that Montgomery already has a connection with Aaron Rodgers. He has good hands and will put to use his 18 broke tackles from 2016 because a lot of his routes will be ran in traffic.
The only question mark will be Montgomery’s blocking ability. He will be called on to block a lot more near the goal line and in short yardage situations.
But that shouldn’t be a deal breaker. He can stretch the seam, which would open things up for the receivers on the outside. Basically, it would make an already potent offense nearly unstoppable.
When Jared Cook was in Green Bay a couple years ago, it was proven how much smoother things operated when the offense had spacing. Receivers knew they had room and because of the respect for Rodgers, the running backs also got plenty of opportunities in the running game as well.
Montgomery is searching for a role on this team. He’s too good of a player and too good of a teammate to collect dust. He is the sparkplug that can lift the entire locker room because of the sacrifices that he’s made.
Everyone knows how hard he has worked to switch positions once. His teammates will have his back when he does it again.

Continue Reading @ CheeseheadTV 

CheeseheadTV wrote:



I was not a fan of Ty as a RB. I just don't think he would be a long term solution. But I admire the man. I love the quote "he doesn’t have a selfish bone in his body". Give me a whole team of guys like this.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
6 years ago
Yup...and he has talent. I bet he COULD play tight end.
Vince Lombardi was great at that. Taking players and having them learn other positions that fit their talents.
He made some offensive guys become defensive players where they thrived.
Ty has the size and the ability to play as a WR and a RB, so why not give him a shot at TE?
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
6 years ago
I don't know how this would work, really.

I haven't seen anything that makes me believe he has the frame to put on another 25 pounds. He ran a 4.55 at the Combine at 220lbs, with many thinking it was on the slow side because he put on too muscle. He's only 6'0, which means he doesn't have any height advantage at all and that he would be one of the smallest TEs in the league. He can't really block as well as you'd like out of your tight end, which is pretty logical, being a WR and all for most of his career.

His strength has always been that he's an athlete. A guy you can rotate between slot receiver, scat back, special teamer and returner. You lose all of that if you force him to put on a big amount of weight. And in the end you'll be stuck with a not-very-good tight end.

Tight ends who are mismatches are just that because they're too big and tall to be covered by corners, but too fast and athletic to be covered by linebackers. They're freaks of nature, rather than guys who are build like wide receivers, but just put on another 40 pounds.
sschind
6 years ago


Either keep him at RB or move him back to WR. You are going to waste his talents for another year while he gets used to a new position? I know TE may not be all that much different than WR and the blocking scheme may be somewhat familiar to him as a RB and I know he is a smart guy but for crying out loud let the man learn a position and play it. He is not big enough for any other offensive positions so what's next? DB?
Smokey
6 years ago

Yup...and he has talent. I bet he COULD play tight end.
Vince Lombardi was great at that. Taking players and having them learn other positions that fit their talents.
He made some offensive guys become defensive players where they thrived.
Ty has the size and the ability to play as a WR and a RB, so why not give him a shot at TE?

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



At only 6 foot tall, IMO, Ty Montgomery does not have the size or the bulk to play TE. A 6'3" LB of average ability could brush him to the side in pursuit of a RB or QB. However, returning him to WR (slot) would be a great fit.

I'm not one that can say where GB's next great TE will come from, but I have at least 1 player in mind that I believe would be a good fit. I'll not jinx that fit with this post, but I will be watching this player during this off season.

I believe that a lot of NFL business is being delayed as the Kirk Cousins auction remains unresolved. It appears at this time that the NYJ's and the Vikings are the final bidders for his services. Following that, a flood of deals will take place. Rodgers new contract will then be resolved, and GB will have a better idea of how to manage, deal, and trade and remain within their 2018 Budget. A deal for a TE may then be possible, maybe.

UserPostedImage
nerdmann
6 years ago
Jordy's our interim TE. He's a little taller and he can block better than Richard Rodgers. Long as his straight line speed doesn't fall below 4.8, he should be able to get down the seam on occasion.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
yooperfan
6 years ago
Smokey is right, Montgomery doesn't have the physical stature to play tight end.
I certainly wouldn't want to see Jordy switch positions either.
If we're going to have a player switch positions to play tight end, I would like them to try Jeff Janis.
nerdmann
6 years ago

Smokey is right, Montgomery doesn't have the physical stature to play tight end.
I certainly wouldn't want to see Jordy switch positions either.
If we're going to have a player switch positions to play tight end, I would like them to try Jeff Janis.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan 



Janis would be interesting, but I'm not sure he's re-upped on a contract. Anyway they're already using Jordy in this way "lining up in the slot" and blocking.

If you wanna switch a guy, maybe look at Biegel. Possibly Fackrell too.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Cheesey
6 years ago
You guys are probably right. I was just trying to figure out how to keep him (and his talent) on the field for us.

UserPostedImage
steveishere
6 years ago
Being a TE isn't going to make him healthier, which is the only thing keeping him from being a good WR or RB. A move like that makes no sense at all.
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (19h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (19h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Rude!
beast (23h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

19h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.