Question: how many threads has he started about the President?
Originally Posted by: Cheesey
Not my President! Russian prostitutes have never pissed on my President [See Steele dossier].
Not my President! Just like George would not be my King nor Hitler my Chancellor.
The first arrests from his collusion with Russia will be performed in the next day or 2. Soon he won’t be your President either, unless you live in Cell Block C.
I just read Barfarn's replies. He insinuated we were having issues due to his race? That is some bizarre sick insinuation. Nobody has trashed Hundley the person.
In true Barfarn fashion he's also tried insinuating that Hundley's performance wasn't that bad because nobody had piece by piece broken down his performance? I don't think it's hard to conclude that 12-25 for 87 and no pass TDs with a pick isn't very good but what do we know? It was a winning performance, we just don't understand football or the tape?
Originally Posted by: uffda udfa
It’s okay to express thoughts on Hundley’s play in a word or phrase; that’s called a pure opinion.
The intellectual wheels come when the completely unsupported opinion is arrogantly and childishly treated like some sort of expert analysis. Then this monosyllabic “analysis” is exploited to portend support for a greater argument like Hundley will always suck; the season is doomed; Hill is better; Ted is an idiot or I’m living a happy life 😂.
LEARN from your past claptrap on Adams. Your prediction that he’d be cut last year was the absolute zenith of irrationality and intellectual incompetence. Not because you were wrong [or correct if he was cut]; but because of the process employed. You took 2 pieces of info [Cherry-picked performances and one single published 40 time in underwear] and formed your prediction like God formed Eve from Adams’ rib. Hundreds of thousands of words across 15 different sports forums were type-smashed blathered about such stupidly irrelevant things from his hair cut to Ted’s history of failed picks. Obviously, this endless vapid drivel was 100% void of each and every fact or morsel of football acumen one needs to actually analyze Adams’ roster viability.
It didn’t even cross my mind your silly opinion of Adams concerned his skin color. I’ve said this before, so it’s not an “insinuation;” your idol, Rodney, kicked you off his site, others kicked you off their sites because you irrationally kiddy troll your agenda of hate on Ted and McCarthy. I believed this was the thing propping your claptrapped argument.
I expected you were doing the same thing with Hundley. Droning on for pages bitching about how he chews gum, bitching about any historical Ted failure and blitheringly ignoring anything he has done positive or speak of his release, foot work, accuracy when under pressure, accuracy when not, etc.
But, now YOU bring up race. YOU said, interestingly purporting to speak for the Clique 😂 that “Barfarn insinuated we were having issues due to Hundey’s race?” This is FALSE! [And constitutes MULTIPLE TOS violations].
When Person A states that Person B is “insinuating” X,Y,Z, it reveals only that Person A is thinking X,Y,Z. Barfarn 10-29-2017.
Here’s a rhetorical question, because we all know the answer: your arguments on Hundley disparage 1265 and go WAY beyond comment of his performance against Saints and the support for these arguments rank from silly to idiotic; YOU, UNILATERALLY mention race revealing that race must consist of at least part of your thinking; do you think that’s appropriate?