beast
7 years ago

I get it. If you agree...not speculation. If you don't agree, all speculation and awful person presenting.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


Sadly, you still don't get it. Blueleopard's post was mostly good info, instead of biased speculation... though I would of said 6 sacks per year instead of 7. Though I don't know about Brooks' overall talent, I just haven't watched him lately enough to have an opinion.

The best thing about his signing is he is reportedly tough. Our D has been so soft for so long but with Brice back there and Josh Jones as erratic as he is, we're adding some intimidators. Maybe, this will push the metrosexual Matthews to a new level along with soft Nick.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


I can agree with this too...

Though sometimes that will get flags too



UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
7 years ago
It's interesting that Uncle Ted never brings in FAs well none that count against the comp cap. Make that he doesn't bring in any young Fas who don't count against the comp cap. It seems to always be a sliding scale. I get frustrated that he doesn't acquire the eye popping game changer from time to time but there are not that many out there.

Brooks is not going to change the game. He won't become Def Player of the Year Woody. He won't become 10 sack Peppers.

What he will be is:
Needed depth at the OLB position.
A change of pace player that allows CM3 to move inside a few times a game.
A safety net that allows Fackrell, Elliott and Biegel more time to develop.

At worst he will eat up a little money this year and be gone. If he is lousy he won't even be activated for games. If he is mediocre he will stand on the sideline and trot out for 3-4 snaps to allow CM3 to catch his breath. If he is good he will be a solid part of the rotation. If he's great he will get another contract for a couple of more years.
UserPostedImage
Smokey
7 years ago
Excuse me , but did or did not the Packers sign Ahmad Brooks to a 1 year deal ?

If true, then why does he not show up on the 53 man roster ? (per Packers.com)

[confused]

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
7 years ago

Excuse me , but did or did not the Packers sign Ahmad Brooks to a 1 year deal ?

If true, then why does he not show up on the 53 man roster ? (per Packers.com)

[confused]

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



Ahmad Brooks and the Packers agreed to a deal. Brooks has not yet signed. Why? I'm not sure, but maybe they are waiting to see who they get back on practice squad or maybe trade ... I am not sure what the deal is.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
7 years ago

Excuse me , but did or did not the Packers sign Ahmad Brooks to a 1 year deal ?

If true, then why does he not show up on the 53 man roster ? (per Packers.com)

[confused]

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



They are waiting until 4pm to put Montravius Adams the rookie DL on IR so he'll be eligible to return later. Then they'll sign Brooks to fill his roster spot. I guess it's a risk if someone swoops in and offers Brooks a better deal in the meantime but it's just Ahmad Brooks so... šŸ¤·
Smokey
7 years ago

They are waiting until 4pm to put Montravius Adams the rookie DL on IR so he'll be eligible to return later. Then they'll sign Brooks to fill his roster spot. I guess it's a risk if someone swoops in and offers Brooks a better deal in the meantime but it's just Ahmad Brooks so... šŸ¤·

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



Thanks for clearing that up . [thumbup]
UserPostedImage
beast
7 years ago

They are waiting until 4pm to put Montravius Adams the rookie DL on IR so he'll be eligible to return later. Then they'll sign Brooks to fill his roster spot. I guess it's a risk if someone swoops in and offers Brooks a better deal in the meantime but it's just Ahmad Brooks so... šŸ¤·

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



Someone was listening šŸ‘

I feel like we're been trying to explain that over and over. Though the Adams to IR is a bit of speculation (but it seems like good speculation). I'm also wondering if they might do it with any other injured player as well... example being the Packers have 4 Centers right now with Barclay and Patrick also injured.
UserPostedImage
dhazer
7 years ago

I understand Steve. I was referring to the fact Foster made Brooks very expendable to the Niners. He wouldn't have been out on the street for us to get, although, that is speculation on my part based on Foster's unbelievable play.

King over Foster has a real chance to be much worse than Bulaga over Dez.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 




I think King over TJ Watt is a much bigger mistake.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be šŸ™‚ (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago

I think King over TJ Watt is a much bigger mistake.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



Taking King, period, was a mistake. šŸ¤£


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because theyā€™ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (7m) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (9m) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (19m) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (24m) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (26m) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (27m) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (28m) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (32m) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (40m) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (40m) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (40m) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (41m) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (41m) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (42m) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (42m) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (42m) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (43m) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (44m) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (45m) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (45m) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (46m) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (46m) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (52m) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (52m) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (53m) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (54m) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (55m) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (55m) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (55m) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (56m) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (58m) : What?
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tuaā€™s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tuaā€™s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Yes, the Pro Bowl. It was played Sunday before Super Bowl from 2010-2022
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : pro bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : From 2010 to 2022, it was played on the Sunday before the Super Bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : They moved it to the BYE week before Super Bowl several years ago.
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : it was always after the SB.....
beast (10-Feb) : Though I stop following pro bowl years ago
beast (10-Feb) : I thought the pro game was before the Super Bowl?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

10-Feb / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

10-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.