beast
7 years ago

I get it. If you agree...not speculation. If you don't agree, all speculation and awful person presenting.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


Sadly, you still don't get it. Blueleopard's post was mostly good info, instead of biased speculation... though I would of said 6 sacks per year instead of 7. Though I don't know about Brooks' overall talent, I just haven't watched him lately enough to have an opinion.

The best thing about his signing is he is reportedly tough. Our D has been so soft for so long but with Brice back there and Josh Jones as erratic as he is, we're adding some intimidators. Maybe, this will push the metrosexual Matthews to a new level along with soft Nick.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


I can agree with this too...

Though sometimes that will get flags too



UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
7 years ago
It's interesting that Uncle Ted never brings in FAs well none that count against the comp cap. Make that he doesn't bring in any young Fas who don't count against the comp cap. It seems to always be a sliding scale. I get frustrated that he doesn't acquire the eye popping game changer from time to time but there are not that many out there.

Brooks is not going to change the game. He won't become Def Player of the Year Woody. He won't become 10 sack Peppers.

What he will be is:
Needed depth at the OLB position.
A change of pace player that allows CM3 to move inside a few times a game.
A safety net that allows Fackrell, Elliott and Biegel more time to develop.

At worst he will eat up a little money this year and be gone. If he is lousy he won't even be activated for games. If he is mediocre he will stand on the sideline and trot out for 3-4 snaps to allow CM3 to catch his breath. If he is good he will be a solid part of the rotation. If he's great he will get another contract for a couple of more years.
UserPostedImage
Smokey
7 years ago
Excuse me , but did or did not the Packers sign Ahmad Brooks to a 1 year deal ?

If true, then why does he not show up on the 53 man roster ? (per Packers.com)

[confused]

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
7 years ago

Excuse me , but did or did not the Packers sign Ahmad Brooks to a 1 year deal ?

If true, then why does he not show up on the 53 man roster ? (per Packers.com)

[confused]

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



Ahmad Brooks and the Packers agreed to a deal. Brooks has not yet signed. Why? I'm not sure, but maybe they are waiting to see who they get back on practice squad or maybe trade ... I am not sure what the deal is.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
7 years ago

Excuse me , but did or did not the Packers sign Ahmad Brooks to a 1 year deal ?

If true, then why does he not show up on the 53 man roster ? (per Packers.com)

[confused]

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



They are waiting until 4pm to put Montravius Adams the rookie DL on IR so he'll be eligible to return later. Then they'll sign Brooks to fill his roster spot. I guess it's a risk if someone swoops in and offers Brooks a better deal in the meantime but it's just Ahmad Brooks so... 🤷
Smokey
7 years ago

They are waiting until 4pm to put Montravius Adams the rookie DL on IR so he'll be eligible to return later. Then they'll sign Brooks to fill his roster spot. I guess it's a risk if someone swoops in and offers Brooks a better deal in the meantime but it's just Ahmad Brooks so... 🤷

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



Thanks for clearing that up . [thumbup]
UserPostedImage
beast
7 years ago

They are waiting until 4pm to put Montravius Adams the rookie DL on IR so he'll be eligible to return later. Then they'll sign Brooks to fill his roster spot. I guess it's a risk if someone swoops in and offers Brooks a better deal in the meantime but it's just Ahmad Brooks so... 🤷

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



Someone was listening 👍

I feel like we're been trying to explain that over and over. Though the Adams to IR is a bit of speculation (but it seems like good speculation). I'm also wondering if they might do it with any other injured player as well... example being the Packers have 4 Centers right now with Barclay and Patrick also injured.
UserPostedImage
dhazer
7 years ago

I understand Steve. I was referring to the fact Foster made Brooks very expendable to the Niners. He wouldn't have been out on the street for us to get, although, that is speculation on my part based on Foster's unbelievable play.

King over Foster has a real chance to be much worse than Bulaga over Dez.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 




I think King over TJ Watt is a much bigger mistake.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago

I think King over TJ Watt is a much bigger mistake.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



Taking King, period, was a mistake. 🤣


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Rude!
beast (3h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (6h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (9h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (10h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.