Packers Free Agents· Page 3

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

7 years ago

Tretter is ill suited for G. He's a tackle or C but not a G. Can't imagine the thought of him being the replacement for Lang, if he walks.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

porky88
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#22

My question with the idea of Tretter replacing Lang is can we Trust Tretter to stay healthy? Lang gets injured is able to keep playing, Tretters injuries have taken him out for a good while.

Plus it would be nice to keep both, Lang could stay at RG while Tretter and/or Spriggs could challenge Taylor at LG.

Originally Posted by: beast

I can't see Ted Thompson investing big money into a guard that will be 30 in September of 2017. I would prefer he invests that money in a free-agent corner, such as Stephen Gilmore.

Tretter is injury prone, and that is a valid concern. He has played well when he's been on the field, though. We forget that he had an excellent 2016 training camp, and flat out earned a role in the starting lineup.

Another option is kicking Bulaga inside and going with Jason Spriggs at right tackle. Spriggs was a second-round pick, after all. However, Bulaga is so dominate at right tackle that I would hate to do that.

In the end, I think Ted Thompson will see that he has options and that will make Lang expendable in his eyes.

http://www.row12.com/

nerdmann
Premier Member

7 years ago

#23

IMO, this is the most relevant and currently the most important thread in the Packershome Forum right now. According to the Acme Packing Co. site, GB will have 20 free agents from the 2016 roster to deal with. With Shields and Starks gone , it may now be just 18 players.

Porkey88 has the right idea, but I'd like to read your's . Keep, trade, release, Many decisions that the Packers will have to make .

[cheers]

Originally Posted by: Smokey

Being the smartest person on the forum, I suppose it's my place to step up and give the definitive answer. Maybe I'll do a blog post this week and break down the entire roster for you guys.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Smokey
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#24

Being the smartest person on the forum, I suppose it's my place to step up and give the definitive answer. Maybe I'll do a blog post this week and break down the entire roster for you guys.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

FAB

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (10m) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (11m) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (25m) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (27m) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (28m) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (28m) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (29m) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (33m) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (33m) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (33m) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (34m) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (35m) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (38m) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (42m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (43m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (44m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (53m) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (59m) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (1h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (1h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (1h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (1h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (1h) : Packers will get in

beast (1h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (1h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (1h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (3h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (4h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (4h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (4h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (5h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (14h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (14h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (18h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!

wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS