Another Season, Pissed Away Unnecessarily.· Page 4

musccy
Veteran Member

9 years ago

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

9 years ago

This is why people "hyena" you.

You use non sequitors and factually innaccurate statements to constantly cry about how your favorite white players aren't getting enough chances to take over the league.

😢 Waaaaah

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I didn't read an answer in there, Nerd. When exactly were we "in control" in that game? When? No answer will be forthcoming because it doesn't fit with the fallacy you've created.

My favorite white players? Now, that's the kind of misdirection I wish our offense would run.

Read YOUR post and tell me who here has made factually inaccurate statements? YOU.

Again, what point were we "in control"? I'm dying to read it.

I know your gut told us we were going to win and you wanted the accolades a prediction can bring but I'm sorry the game doesn't back your contention that we were in control. Show me an article out there from a national unbiased source that speaks to how we blew this game. Should be easy for you to link here if they're out there. They aren't. NOBODY thinks the Packers had this game firmly in control and choked it away ala Seattle last year save for maybe you and your gut.

We scored 13 points prior to another MIRACLE last second play. Arizona had 7 at half and we had 6. I'm running permutations like crazy trying to figure out how being down by 1 at half and having our biggest lead of 6 as being "in control". I read your crazy talk for most of this season. Not sure how you keep on keeping on but you do.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#33

I can't believe how much stupid talk goes on here.
Yes, we lost. But the fact that with all the injuries we were in it till the end shows the heart and backbone our guys have.
I wonder why some of you even bother to watch Packer games.
Arizona is an excellent team.
It's not like we lost to a lousy team.
Did I want a win? Of course.
But let's face it....had the Packers won, then won the NFC title and then lost in the super bowl, the same ones that are whining now would be spreading the same manure they are spreading now.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

On the bright side "The King Spreader" is back and will provide us all with hilarious readings for the next several months!

Sucks that The Packers lost, but there is nothing but improvement in their future!

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

voiceofreason
Member

9 years ago

#34

Blame the Defense;OH MY GOD....😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

We had the ball twice in the 4th with a chance to end the game; juts like last year; just like v SF in 2013.

In 2012, Shields spots us 7-0 lead if Aaron Rodgers plays an MVP first half, does throw stupid INT, SF never runs over us.

In 2011, Aaron Rodgers just sucked.

This is now a pattern!! We will never win a super bowl with Aaron Rodgers at QB!!!!!!!!!!!

He demonstrated numerous times how stupid he can be in crunch time. His play at end of Detroit, Carolina and Minn was outrageous. It the play of a choker. Aaron Rodgers is a choker.

His outrageously stupid plays in the Minn game at crunch time and today I have never seen a more ball-less attempts on 3rd and 5 and 4th and 5 by any QB in my life. Rodgers is a pussy. And the absolute STUPIDITY thinking that someone is gonna fall for a fake spike; something he's put on tape several times in the 2nd half of this season. There are just no words.

Fact is at his worst he's a bad Mark Sanchez; at his best he's now just Jay Cutler. At any time or any game he can look MVP, but he'll NEVER EVER be able to string together a couple of wins against good teams. So we mind as well just move on.

We can cut him and save 6M.

If we trade him, we'd still save 6M; but the other team would get him for 13M next year, the Browns would be a good trade partner maybe we get a 1st and a 3rd.

I'd like to see Hundley do in 2016, what Bridgewater does for Minnesota.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn

You are literally insane. Rodgers had a bad regular season by his own high standards. In the playoffs he was amazing. We went to overtime against a team that EVERYONE said we shouldn't be on the same field with. At least your calling for Hundley now instead of Tolzien. Every team in the league would take Rodgers for a 1st and a 3rd. Even if it was just to re-trade him for actual value. Your posts are like delusional fan-fiction.

blank

dhazer
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#35

Actually, we lost because our DB's can't catch simple interceptions.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

If they had great hands they would be playing on the other side of the ball 😒

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

#36

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Go back and watch the 2nd and 3rd quarters.

Or just keep deluding yourself that Janis is the next Jerry Rice. Whichever.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

#37

Originally Posted by: voiceofreason

Agreed. Aaron stopped tanking the offense in the playoffs. Took him that first quarter against the REdskins to shake the rust off too.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

68md
Member

9 years ago

#38

We had a sub par season on offense with a OL put together with duct tape.... our QB has some of the strangest mental moments ever and MM had his head up his hinder 13 weeks of the season to boot.

Beyond that it forced your defense to be on the field most times a series or 2 too long. Our LB still can't cover and while our DB are improved and going to be special they are young and prone to mistakes at inopportune moments.

Last note is WR... I stand by my statement a couple weeks back, letting the WR and QB get coached by 1 coach and not getting them 1 on 1 coaching was a SNAFU by MM. Bit us in the ass most of the year.

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#39

Our defense was killing the cardinals until they realized they could hold.

Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#40

Go back and watch the 2nd and 3rd quarters.

Or just keep deluding yourself that Janis is the next Jerry Rice. Whichever.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

So, we were "in control" in the 2nd and 3rd quarters? We were down 7-6 at half but we were "in control" in the 2nd quarter? Delusion, Nerd. You're full on. This team was never close to being in control in this game.

The team scored 13 points before the 2nd hail mary. 13 point lead vs. Arizona unless it was with 2 minutes left wouldn't be an in control thing with their offensive capabilities.

Do you type to convince the readers here or yourself? Even here, I don't think you would find a single soul who would agree that the Packers were "in control" at any point in this game and that blows your big point that we pissed the game away. You can create that all day every day. We know you think the Packers should never ever lose and be 160-0 in regular season under TT.

This team was BRUTAL most of the season. It's a miracle we won a playoff game. It's a miracle we hung with Arizona. CONTROL? ControLOL!!!!

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

wpr (5h) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22