Dulak
9 years ago

Oh, that was his idea that the Packers forced Nick Collins to have surgery? My mistake then as I read it as he was stating a fact.

Uffda said many times once the season starts, he goes into hibernation. If you read what he said, you would know this. Your bromance for the guy is starting to cross a border of being gross. Not that there is anything wrong with that, of course. 😁

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Not pointing at you Zero ... But - doing fusion surgery to a pro nfl player isnt a smart thing to do and expect him to recover and play. I know its common 'medical' practice to do this type of surgery; but others just as trained believe otherwise and have patients that recover and do not have the repercussions of surgery to boot (which in the nfl can end their career).

nerdmann
9 years ago

Nick Collins made the decision to have the surgery. If you do not know facts, maybe stop spouting off as if you do? I really don't know why you have this annoying hatred for the Packers medical staff, but you really do not have any idea what you are talking about. Focus on things you know, like, teams self shitting for example or perhaps a lull or two.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



The way I remember they told him they wouldn't let him play until he got it. Then he did, so they still wouldn't let him play.

Meanwhile I've seen hundreds of "disc bulges" just like that get successfully treated without any surgery whatsoever. Therefore I conclude that the team doctor is incompetent and does not know wtf he is doing.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

The way I remember they told him they wouldn't let him play until he got it. Then he did, so they still wouldn't let him play.

Meanwhile I've seen hundreds of "disc bulges" just like that get successfully treated without any surgery whatsoever. Therefore I conclude that the team doctor is incompetent and does not know wtf he is doing.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



That's a far cry from what you said. And Nick was told for him to have any chance at playing, he needed the surgery. This is very common and transparent. Nick could have chosen no surgery and walked away. Nick made the choice, no one made him.

We have to stop thinking we are entitled to medical concerns of athletes. Know your role and accept it is not your business.


UserPostedImage
nerdmann
9 years ago

That's a far cry from what you said. And Nick was told for him to have any chance at playing, he needed the surgery. This is very common and transparent. Nick could have chosen no surgery and walked away. Nick made the choice, no one made him.

We have to stop thinking we are entitled to medical concerns of athletes. Know your role and accept it is not your business.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



To reiterate, he could have just gotten rid of the bulge. It's not difficult.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

Not pointing at you Zero ... But - doing fusion surgery to a pro nfl player isnt a smart thing to do and expect him to recover and play. I know its common 'medical' practice to do this type of surgery; but others just as trained believe otherwise and have patients that recover and do not have the repercussions of surgery to boot (which in the nfl can end their career).

Originally Posted by: Dulak 



Those were not the expectations. Those were mere hopes. If the guy wanted ANY CHANCE at playing again, he had to have the surgery. It is critical to understand that phrase -- ANY CHANCE -- here. It does not mean he was expected to return to the field. It does not mean he was immediately cleared once surgery was over. No, nothing of the sort. It means for the player to have had ANY CHANCE (widely acknowledged as slim) the surgery was necessary.

A lot of athletes are posed with the option of retire or have surgery and work your ass off to get back on the field. ACL for example. You can recover from that and live a normal non-athlete life, but if you want ANY CHANCE of playing again you are better off to have the surgery.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
9 years ago
Gotta respect a staff that respects its players.

UserPostedImage
beast
9 years ago

Gotta respect a staff that respects its players.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Very very very true.

BUT... I have to wonder that IF he is done for the season, when or if the Packers will move him to the IR. (and they could still be doing more test to determine stuff). Then again even if they moved him to the IR, that doesn't mean they would do anything with his roster spot... as Ted Thompson has done it a number of times, left a roster spot open to give him freedom to make moves if/when a move is needed (and I think he left Nick Collins on the roster a while even after it was reported his career is probably over and clearly his season was over).

Normally it hasn't hurt Ted Thompson or the Packers but it did seem to tick off or piss off CB Jumal Rolle, who might of been ticked off before that, as he seemed (according to a number of fans) seemed to out play CB Goodson, and they kept Goodson, and didn't bring up Rolle when they had a free roster spot, so when he got an offer from the Texans, he was gone (even though rumor has it the Packers then offered a roster spot to him as well).

But if there is basically a free spot, I wouldn't mind locking up DL Gaston or TE Perillo (or someone better if they like someone more). Packers could also use more depth at TE, LB and S with possible injuries making those spots slim of healthy players.


UserPostedImage
DoddPower
9 years ago

Very very very true.

BUT... I have to wonder that IF he is done for the season, when or if the Packers will move him to the IR. (and they could still be doing more test to determine stuff). Then again even if they moved him to the IR, that doesn't mean they would do anything with his roster spot... as Ted Thompson has done it a number of times, left a roster spot open to give him freedom to make moves if/when a move is needed (and I think he left Nick Collins on the roster a while even after it was reported his career is probably over and clearly his season was over).

Normally it hasn't hurt Ted Thompson or the Packers but it did seem to tick off or piss off CB Jumal Rolle, who might of been ticked off before that, as he seemed (according to a number of fans) seemed to out play CB Goodson, and they kept Goodson, and didn't bring up Rolle when they had a free roster spot, so when he got an offer from the Texans, he was gone (even though rumor has it the Packers then offered a roster spot to him as well).

But if there is basically a free spot, I wouldn't mind locking up DL Gaston or TE Perillo (or someone better if they like someone more). Packers could also use more depth at TE, LB and S with possible injuries making those spots slim of healthy players.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Gaston would be nice. Good depth.
Barfarn
9 years ago
It's possible they're doing tests that will affect what seems to be the inevitable. But I think its just a stall until they decide what to do w/ the roster spot.
Ted Thompson may have made an error last year moving Mulumba to IR too quickly [leaving us w/ 52 on roster] because for a player to qualify for a 3rd year on practice squad the team must have a full roster the entire time the guy was on PS. It's hard to believe Ted Thompson would have goofed like that, so maybe the roster has to be at 52 for more than 1 week and/or to qualify for those newly created 2 practice squad spots the 52 roster thingy doesn't matter.

And as Beast points out, if you have an open roster spot, all 10 guys on the PS might get pi$$ed and/or feel the club doesn't value them at all.

greengold
9 years ago

It's possible they're doing tests that will affect what seems to be the inevitable. But I think its just a stall until they decide what to do w/ the roster spot.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 





Tim Scott is on the Cowboys practice squad. Played 3 years at CB and his senior year at S in college.

http://www.goheels.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=205497684 
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (17m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (26m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (37m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
14m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.