Zero2Cool
16 years ago

Maybe the Green Bay Packers finally can break out an offensive wrinkle that was a nice change-of-pace weapon last year.

With receiver James Jones probably ready to return from a sprained knee this week, the Packers for the first time this season could have all five receivers healthy for a game.

If coach Mike McCarthy opts to activate all five, he could bring back the five-receiver package he used so well last year for a handful of plays a game to stretch defenses and force favorable matchups in the passing game.

Its a great package, receiver Donald Driver said Monday. If we ran it, theres no five (defensive backs) in the National Football League that can stop us.

McCarthy started using the five-receiver set early last season when the running game was ailing and he had a strong receiver corps and a veteran quarterback. He only used it as a change-up, usually around five snaps a game, but it generally was effective and also gave defensive coordinators one more problem for their game planning.

This year, though, with injuries to Ruvell Martin (broken finger) and Jones (knee), the Packers have never had more than four receivers healthy. The Packers held Jones out of their last game, against Indianapolis, knowing hed also have the bye week to rest and get close to full strength he missed the regular-season opener and three of the last four games because of his injury and it appears to have paid off.

Jones practiced Monday and said his knee passed the test. Theres no practice Tuesday, and the normal practice week starts Wednesday.

I ran full speed, Jones said. Tested it out and exploded, it felt good. Hopefully Ill wake up with no soreness or anything like that.

Especially with second-round draft pick Jordy Nelson coming on recently, the five-receiver package could be a way for McCarthy to maximize his depth at the position, which might be the teams strongest top to bottom. Because of the injury to Jones, who came into the season as the No. 3 receiver, Nelson has played regularly in the rotation, sometimes as a third receiver, sometimes as a fourth. There are occasional packages where hes one of two receivers on the field.

Nelson ranks third in receptions (16) among Packers wide receivers, with 15 of those coming in the last five games. Greg Jennings (37) and Donald Driver (29) are the Packers two leading receivers overall, and Martin has five receptions he missed the second and third games because of a broken finger.

The Packers practiced the five-receiver set during training camp, so McCarthy can add it to a weekly game plan without much difficulty. The grouping provides especially favorable matchups because at least two receivers are likely to be covered by the lone linebacker, a safety or the No. 4 cornerback. The Packers think Jones, Martin and Nelson should win those battles.

Every time we went with the fab five (last year) people called time out, Driver said. Hopefully, we can do the same thing this year.

The greatest downside is that package leaves only the five offensive linemen to protect quarterback Aaron Rodgers, so Rodgers and the linemen have no margin for error on blitz pickups and hot reads. However, it makes it harder for the defense to disguise blitzes.

It spreads the defense out, Rodgers said, and kind of makes them tell you what theyre going to do, if theyre going to bring pressure or drop off. Thats what I like about it, it defines what the defense is going to be.


UserPostedImage
TheEngineer
16 years ago
Good stuff. Hope they bring it against the Titans and try and change it up.
blank
zombieslayer
16 years ago

Its a great package, receiver Donald Driver said Monday. If we ran it, theres no five (defensive backs) in the National Football League that can stop us.



Gotta love DD.

The greatest downside is that package leaves only the five offensive linemen to protect quarterback Aaron Rodgers, so Rodgers and the linemen have no margin for error on blitz pickups and hot reads. However, it makes it harder for the defense to disguise blitzes.



Go ahead and blitz. Let's do the math. You need 5 DBs to cover the 5 WRs. Let's just say 4 people on the DL. That's nine. Then you have two people back. They blitz and you get Jordy, Martin, or James Jones on an inferior CB one on one, or maybe even a Safety. If Aaron Rodgers can recognize the read right away, a good chance for a long YAC TD. So bring it!
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
With our inept running game I hope we see it more than five times a game lol
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
16 years ago
Haha weeeeell

You know this all sounds good, but DD said that last year and the Giants stopped it. If a defense can apply pressure with 3 or 4 guys... consider the big 5 a non-factor.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
zombieslayer
16 years ago

Haha weeeeell

You know this all sounds good, but DD said that last year and the Giants stopped it. If a defense can apply pressure with 3 or 4 guys... consider the big 5 a non-factor.

"DarkaneRules" wrote:



If I'm not mistaken, the Giants and da Bears were the only teams that were able to stop it. I don't remember how much it was used against the Cows.

I'd love to see it brought back. At the worst, it will waste a lot of their coaches times having to gameplan against it and that is time that could have been spent gameplanning for something else.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
beast
16 years ago

The greatest downside is that package leaves only the five offensive linemen to protect quarterback Aaron Rodgers, so Rodgers and the linemen have no margin for error on blitz pickups and hot reads. However, it makes it harder for the defense to disguise blitzes.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Go ahead and blitz. Let's do the math. You need 5 DBs to cover the 5 WRs. Let's just say 4 people on the DL. That's nine. Then you have two people back. They blitz and you get Jordy, Martin, or James Jones on an inferior CB one on one, or maybe even a Safety. If Aaron Rodgers can recognize the read right away, a good chance for a long YAC TD. So bring it!




For the 5 DBs to cover the 5 WRs... How many teams have a guy that can go one on one with Jennings is stop him from getting open?

I don't know but not too many so that more like 6 DBs for 5 WRs.

Also the other team would most likely try to blitz the closest CB to Rodgers which Rodgers hasn't done great against. Then again nether did Favre.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
16 years ago
[quote="zombieslayer"][quote="DarkaneRules"]Haha weeeeell


If I'm not mistaken, the Giants and da Bears were the only teams that were able to stop it. I don't remember how much it was used against the Cows.

quote]

Well I believe two of those games, the weather stopped it, and the third should have been a blow out, but James Jones fumbled twice. I say we roll dice with it, especially in Minnesota in two weeks.
UserPostedImage
Since69
16 years ago

With our inept running game I hope we see it more than five times a game lol

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I think our inept running game will benefit most of all from the return of the "Big 5".
UserPostedImage
warhawk
16 years ago
I think this a good time to bring in a new scheme that teams will have to contend with considering the further into the season the more you know what your opponents do.

It's effective enough that teams have to work it into their weekly planning and prepare for it.

I like Rodgers take on it as far as making it easy to recognize what the defense is going to do. IF they bring an extra rusher he knows the other five are all playing man. I thought that was interesting. Wouldn't it be great if the QB always knew what coverage they were going to see.
"The train is leaving the station."
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (8m) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (10m) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (22m) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (2h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (2h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (2h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (2h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (2h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (2h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (2h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (2h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (4h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (4h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (4h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (5h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (5h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (5h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (6h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (6h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (6h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (8h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (8h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (8h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (8h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (9h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (9h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (9h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (9h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (9h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (9h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (9h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (9h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (9h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (9h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (9h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (9h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (9h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (10h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.