IronMan
10 years ago
Mike McCarthy's halfime speech: "The defense will be better in the 2nd half. You can put that in big letters."
nerdmann
10 years ago

I don't disagree with anything you are saying. I think he's a good coach, but not a great coach. I would like a bit more of a hard-ass. But the Packers offense will be OK. My biggest problem with him is keeping the likes of Dom Capers around. That's borderline inexcusable, imo.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



A little accountability would go a long way.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
musccy
10 years ago


McCarthy: You may not flat-out bench somebody, but I think sometimes you … you don’t really play with 11. There’s plenty of instances where you may only play a guy in base instead of sub or vice-versa. Position has a lot to do with it. Your backup has a lot to do with it. That’s a good question. I’ve never thought about it. To me, I trust the evaluation of the coaches. We sit here and they say, ‘Hey, this is who I think should play this week.’ There have been guys benched on special teams a number of times.[/b][/u]

---He's NEVER thought about it?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Do you, uffda udfa, honestly believe that Mike has never thought about benching a player? Really? Did you also know that Bill Clinton never had "sexual relations" with that woman?


uffda udfa
10 years ago

Do you, uffda udfa, honestly believe that Mike has never thought about benching a player? Really? Did you also know that Bill Clinton never had "sexual relations" with that woman?


Originally Posted by: musccy 



Well, I've seen it quoted, today, that...YOU CAN WRITE IT DOWN IN BIG LETTERS THE DEFENSE WILL BE BETTER.

Every single quote out of Mike McCarthy is a lie going forward because some feel the need to defend Mike McCarthy by saying he's lying here. I have no such need. Why do you...and I don't?

If you think Mike McCarthy is a liar about this statement, then why do you take him at his word on the other? Hypocrisy.

BTW, I'm not sure you understand the term "sexual relations".

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


musccy
10 years ago

Well, I've seen it quoted, today, that...YOU CAN WRITE IT DOWN IN BIG LETTERS THE DEFENSE WILL BE BETTER.

Every single quote out of Mike McCarthy is a lie going forward because some feel the need to defend Mike McCarthy by saying he's lying here. I have no such need. Why do you...and I don't?

If you think Mike McCarthy is a liar about this statement, then why do you take him at his word on the other? Hypocrisy.

BTW, I'm not sure you understand the term "sexual relations".

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



For many organizations, getting info from the GM, HC, or any coordinator needs to, at best, be taken with a HUGE grain of salt. You don't want to reveal your hand. You don't want to throw your own player or coach under the bus. You can't reveal that you already traded Kevin Love to the Cavs before you're allowed to trade him. You don't want to add bulletin board material for the opponent. You don't have as accurate information as the press would like (e.g. injury reports prior to MRIs).

We all know this. I know you know this. [wallme]
nerdmann
10 years ago

Do you, uffda udfa, honestly believe that Mike has never thought about benching a player? Really? Did you also know that Bill Clinton never had "sexual relations" with that woman?


Originally Posted by: musccy 



They've outright released guys in the past.

Most recently Jeremy Ross last year. They cut Rouse after two games that one year.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
10 years ago

For many organizations, getting info from the GM, HC, or any coordinator needs to, at best, be taken with a HUGE grain of salt. You don't want to reveal your hand. You don't want to throw your own player or coach under the bus. You can't reveal that you already traded Kevin Love to the Cavs before you're allowed to trade him. You don't want to add bulletin board material for the opponent. You don't have as accurate information as the press would like (e.g. injury reports prior to MRIs).

We all know this. I know you know this. [wallme]

Originally Posted by: musccy 



What information would Mike McCarthy be protecting with that answer? What bulletin board material would an opponent gain? Your explanation of your point makes no sense in the context of how he non-answered that specific question.

I know what coach speak is... however, there was no reason to be engaging in coach speak to that specific question.
Mike McCarthy doesn't have anything to do with the releasing of players, though...that is TT's arena.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
10 years ago

Well to quote Mike McCarthy in his own words... (when not directed towards the media).



Lets be honest players and coaches lie to the media... but at times the media catches them saying things they don't mean to be public... and I think McCarthy has benched people... like 1st round CB, last 1st round pick of Sherman as GM (don't want to remember his name)... RB Wynn after too many fumbles one game and I'm sure there are others as well.


Originally Posted by: beast 



The main problem stems from the way they show respect to veterans. They kept Driver for a whole extra year. That goes back to the early days of this staff.

Wouldn't mind them holding the DC accountable too, while we're at it.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
musccy
10 years ago

What information would Mike McCarthy be protecting with that answer? What bulletin board material would an opponent gain? Your explanation of your point makes no sense in the context of how he non-answered that specific question.

I know what coach speak is... however, there was no reason to be engaging in coach speak to that specific question.

Mike McCarthy doesn't have anything to do with the releasing of players, though...that is TT's arena.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I was just listing examples of when coaches may not be truthful, not saying it necessarily applied in this specific situation. Like nerd said, he's had people cut the week of a poor performance, so you really think he hasn't thought about benching a player before? What happened with harris in the kick returns v. Seattle?

He was probably just trying to avoid a trap of being asked about Brad Jones being benched, something no coach would want to talk about a current player in public.

I'm not even trying to stick up for m.m. I'm just saying this particular example is a bad one to use if you're trying to find a "gotcha" moment.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (5m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (26m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (34m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (46m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

22m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.