DarkaneRules
11 years ago
“We wanted to operate at a lower volume of scheme,” McCarthy said of scheme evaluation his staff did following last season. “We went after scheme evaluation with the focus of doing less. We’ve learned the harsh lesson (in recent years) about playing players that weren’t ready in terms of scheme.”
- Packers.com

When I heard this during the interview today I let out a huge sigh of relief. Better late than never right?
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
play2win
11 years ago
Yeah, they now have the players to pull off what they want, and simplifying should make this defense a lot better. Dom finally has what he needs, and he's bringing it back in. Good. Let these players do the talking instead of the scheme.
uffda udfa
11 years ago
He's been saying the same thing for a few months now. What that really means may be hard for most of us to figure.

That tells me they believe they have the right players doing the wrong things.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
11 years ago
Yet for some reason, we still have that same defensive staff who failed to have them ready.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
DarkaneRules
11 years ago
Well a lot of coach's talk over this past off-season could have been seen as him putting the defensive staff on notice. There were a few articles online that mentioned that assumption.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
StarrMax1
11 years ago

“We wanted to operate at a lower volume of scheme,” McCarthy said of scheme evaluation his staff did following last season. “We went after scheme evaluation with the focus of doing less. We’ve learned the harsh lesson (in recent years) about playing players that weren’t ready in terms of scheme.”
- Packers.com

When I heard this during the interview today I let out a huge sigh of relief. Better late than never right?

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules 




I am kind of reading this as The Packers are simplifying the defense in case the injury bug hits the D, if it does, they will be able to plug guys in who won't be lost because of a complicated scheme.

Could be completely wrong, but that's my take on the statement.

K.I.S.S. method, anybody ever heard of it?


warhawk
11 years ago
I have a feeling McCarthy had a very direct and pointed conversation with Capers that probably covered every aspect of defense. Personnel, player utilization, concepts, schemes, I mean all of it.

I think he looked at players running around in La La land and guys like Hyde spending far to much time on the sidelines.

I believe he saw enough of players like Raji floundering around at positions where they are just not very good.

I also think he saw enough of young players without a lot of experience filling in for injured regulars that were in just way to over their heads scheme wise to be successful.

"Dom, guys get hurt. Young guys will have to come in and do a job. Don't give them 5 different possible responsibilities depending on what happens when the ball is snapped."

I think the D can be a lot more aggressive if it maybe has a little less on it's plate to think about and am guessing McCarthy made this clear to the Dom.







I
"The train is leaving the station."
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago
I don't think they did what they did last season just to be cute. They played a lot of complex schemes out of necessity based on personnel. I also like the fact that McCarthy talks about keeping things simpler, but the reason I like it is because it tends to confirm what most of us are expecting: greatly upgraded personnel on D. I'm sure we will still see Capers being Capers if/when it is needed to make a play.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Dexter_Sinister
11 years ago

I don't think they did what they did last season just to be cute. They played a lot of complex schemes out of necessity based on personnel. I also like the fact that McCarthy talks about keeping things simpler, but the reason I like it is because it tends to confirm what most of us are expecting: greatly upgraded personnel on D. I'm sure we will still see Capers being Capers if/when it is needed to make a play.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



I think the opposite might be true. They probably had a lot of packages that would use the skill sets of the personnel they had and the injuries took that away.

Leaving them with nothing but a base D that was predictable.

I could see them going with some more packages this year just because they are healthy. The key might be getting every body up to speed on the packages and not having them tailored to just a couple players' skills. Because if you lose that player, your whole package is shot.

Even losing another player and having to fill in a hole in a different position. Taking him out of the role you designed for him. Like when Neal was forced to fill in at linebacker instead of being a hybrid DL/OLB player like Tony Brackens that was unpredictable. Also giving them the ability to go in and out of the Psycho without substitution.

With the addition of Peppers, I can see them going to more packages instead of less. I don't see them lining up in a basic 4-3 and have the clearly defined roles that everyone lines up in every time.

But I could be wrong. I have been wrong before.

Just ask my wife.

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
steveishere
11 years ago
yeah a system where you have to possibly leave better players on the bench because it takes 2 years for them to learn it all doesn't really mesh well with a draft and replace philosophy.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (1h) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (1h) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (1h) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.