You can't even admit when it is right in your face, I'm done trying to enlighten you.

Next year I hope The Packers decide to fire all the coaches, cut every player not working on their rookie salaries, except Rodgers and Mathews.

Ted can then fill the roster with his 11 draft picks(which he will have after trading down 4 times.) and UDFA.

Then I can come on here and listen to you whine about how bad they are, how they are pissing away Rodgers years, except you will finally have gotten it right!!

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 

I am somewhat confused by all the discussion about the personnel and the DL and the DE's and the OLB's and who could play where. Hell, if the guys we have hadn't been hurt I don't see a problem there.
The problem is on the BACK END. How does switching to a 4-3 fix that?
I will say I have seen 4-3 defenses cause problems for both Arod and #4 before him but ONLY when the front four guys were able to get after our QB's without help.

Can anyone tell me we have those four PLUS some guys to rotate that will do this? Because when I see 4-3's that don't get pressure and have to send guys the pass D suffers big time.

Going back to my first thought what difference does it make if these guys or those guys could convert up front when we don't have people on the back end that can guard anybody?

Get some safeties that can pick up the WR's and not totally lose track of where the ball is. I saw a play against the Giants where we had three guys in the area and the WR was still open and caught the ball. I see a WR have to change directions and go sideways on the goal line and the DB charging down the field doesn't even react to the change of direction. Touchdown on a wounded quail pass five yards off target( Previous game). You know, the one where our two guys ran into each other and the WR backs into the endzone for another unearned TD.

How does the fact Perry may be able to play DE in a 4-3 fix THAT?

Originally Posted by: warhawk