Zero2Cool
16 years ago

Say what you want about the ZBS and the types of blockers it gives us, but since we've switched we have had extremely low sack numbers given up by these "smaller, mobile linemen." I don't have a problem with it in the running game either.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



We weren't giving up many sacks with the old Power OL either.
UserPostedImage
Since69
16 years ago

McCarthy emphasizes that he does not run a pure ZBS, he mixes it up, but it does have a big effect on what kind of players the Packers use. The emphasis is on getting linemen who are more nimble, which usually means sacrificing some strength. The downside is that linemen of this type tend to have problems in pass protection, as they get overpowered at times.

"Greg C." wrote:



I sincerely hope this is McCarthy putting his best spin on the personnel moves that Thompson has made. It makes no sense otherwise. Either you zone block or you don't. Either your personnel are nimble enough to zone block or they're bulky enough to push people out of the way. We have to pick a side and stay with it. Offensive linemen don't have time to think. They have to react. What they do in any given situation must be second nature to them. It has to be practiced and repeated until it can be done without thought.

This half-assed "this week you'll be a road grader and next week you'll be throwing yourself at the other guys legs" crap has to stop. McCarthy has preached cohesiveness and consistency since his tenure began and this part-time zone blocking :xcensoredx: isn't going to allow that to happen - especially with young, inexperienced linemen.

On a personal note, zone blocking - and especially cut blocking - seems dirty to me. Its a good way to cause injuries. The only reason it works is because by the 3rd or 4th quarter the other team's defensive line is so beaten up they tend to slack off.


Say what you want about the ZBS and the types of blockers it gives us, but since we've switched we have had extremely low sack numbers given up by these "smaller, mobile linemen." I don't have a problem with it in the running game either.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



Rodgers was sacked five times Sunday night.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
16 years ago



We weren't giving up many sacks with the old Power OL either.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



That's the thing. If you look at Favre's sack totals, they started getting really low with Sherman. I'm no fan of Sherman, but he got one thing right - a good, solid OL. Why fix something that's not broken?
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
16 years ago


Rodgers was sacked five times Sunday night.

"Since69" wrote:



I refuse to judge this O-line while Tony Moll is in there.
UserPostedImage
agopackgo4
16 years ago

Say what you want about the ZBS and the types of blockers it gives us, but since we've switched we have had extremely low sack numbers given up by these "smaller, mobile linemen." I don't have a problem with it in the running game either.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



We weren't giving up many sacks with the old Power OL either.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



Not only that, but Like Larry McCarrin said in the lion game during the radio broadcast.. "Normally the QB takes the O line out to eat, but in the packers case the O line should take Rodgers out" Rodgers is definitily doing a great job avoiding pressure. And he is making that O lines stats look a lot better than how they have played.
Zero2Cool
16 years ago

Say what you want about the ZBS and the types of blockers it gives us, but since we've switched we have had extremely low sack numbers given up by these "smaller, mobile linemen." I don't have a problem with it in the running game either.

"agopackgo4" wrote:



We weren't giving up many sacks with the old Power OL either.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Not only that, but Like Larry McCarrin said in the lion game during the radio broadcast.. "Normally the QB takes the O line out to eat, but in the packers case the O line should take Rodgers out" Rodgers is definitily doing a great job avoiding pressure. And he is making that O lines stats look a lot better than how they have played.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:


Our previous QB was nifty in the pocket as well.


I would just much rather a OL that punishes people so we can get a better running game in the 4th quarter. I really believe that's going to be our downfall this year unless we pick it up a bit.
UserPostedImage
agopackgo4
16 years ago

Say what you want about the ZBS and the types of blockers it gives us, but since we've switched we have had extremely low sack numbers given up by these "smaller, mobile linemen." I don't have a problem with it in the running game either.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



We weren't giving up many sacks with the old Power OL either.

"agopackgo4" wrote:



Not only that, but Like Larry McCarrin said in the lion game during the radio broadcast.. "Normally the QB takes the O line out to eat, but in the packers case the O line should take Rodgers out" Rodgers is definitily doing a great job avoiding pressure. And he is making that O lines stats look a lot better than how they have played.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Our previous QB was nifty in the pocket as well.


I would just much rather a OL that punishes people so we can get a better running game in the 4th quarter. I really believe that's going to be our downfall this year unless we pick it up a bit.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



You think thats going to hurt us, trying to close out games? Or do you think we can get the job done with the passing game?
16 years ago
ZBS has nothing to do with pass protection unless you're saying it's a personnel issue. If so, who do you want to get rid of? Wells and Colledge? Spitz too? That basically means a completely replaced O-line within a few years. If you want to see struggling, I suggest we go that route.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
16 years ago

You think thats going to hurt us, trying to close out games? Or do you think we can get the job done with the passing game?

"agopackgo4" wrote:



I think having a OL that tries to finesse its way around allows the defense to have more energy in the 4th quarter. If we had a OL that punished a DL I just think we'd have a more productive 4th quarter running attack. Mike McCarthy made a excellent counterpoint to that theory and in support of the Zone Blocking scheme. I just don't recall it right now.







Say what you want about the ZBS and the types of blockers it gives us, but since we've switched we have had extremely low sack numbers given up by these "smaller, mobile linemen." I don't have a problem with it in the running game either.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:


ZBS has nothing to do with pass protection unless you're saying it's a personnel issue. If so, who do you want to get rid of? Wells and Colledge? Spitz too? That basically means a completely replaced O-line within a few years. If you want to see struggling, I suggest we go that route.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:


UserPostedImage
agopackgo4
16 years ago

You think thats going to hurt us, trying to close out games? Or do you think we can get the job done with the passing game?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I think having a OL that tries to finesse its way around allows the defense to have more energy in the 4th quarter. If we had a OL that punished a DL I just think we'd have a more productive 4th quarter running attack. Mike McCarthy made a excellent counterpoint to that theory and in support of the Zone Blocking scheme. I just don't recall it right now.

Idk the teams with great offensive lines, still seem to have something in the 4th quarter. Thats when their running backs are most effective.






Say what you want about the ZBS and the types of blockers it gives us, but since we've switched we have had extremely low sack numbers given up by these "smaller, mobile linemen." I don't have a problem with it in the running game either.

"agopackgo4" wrote:


ZBS has nothing to do with pass protection unless you're saying it's a personnel issue. If so, who do you want to get rid of? Wells and Colledge? Spitz too? That basically means a completely replaced O-line within a few years. If you want to see struggling, I suggest we go that route.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:

"MassPackersFan" wrote:

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (now) : oops
Zero2Cool (now) : CB Darius Slay to sign with the Steelers
buckeyepackfan (8m) : Justin Fields to The Jets!
Martha Careful (9m) : Justin Field to the Jets
buckeyepackfan (9m) : Cooper Kupp! After all the stupid money is spent.
Zero2Cool (10m) : Colts are signing Vikings S Cam Bynum
buckeyepackfan (11m) : "Stupid Money" week underway. Let's see if Gute can pluck another gem this year. #8 & #29 last year, who can it be this year? My money is on
Martha Careful (14m) : Former Eagles cornerback Darius Slay is signing with the Steelers, per Jordan Schultz.
Martha Careful (24m) : Sam Darnold is off to the Seattle Seahawks. It’s a three-year, $110.5 m 55m guaranteed.
beast (28m) : Yeah, Adebo has high risk, high reward, longs of INTs but also lots of getting burned deep... I was going to be surprised if we overpaid him
beast (30m) : Adams is from greater Standford area, but when to College in Fresno
Martha Careful (30m) : scratch that...he just signed with the giants
Martha Careful (31m) : Multiple NFL experts assert former Saints standout Paulson Adebo is Packers top choice.
beast (33m) : Rodgers always said he thought it would be very cool to play for the Steelers head coach
Martha Careful (1h) : Boooo
Zero2Cool (1h) : CB DJ Reed to Lions
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers reporter saying don't be surprised if Packers keep Alexander
Zero2Cool (1h) : Rodgers to Steelers seems to be getting some steam
Zero2Cool (2h) : C Drew Dalman to Chicago
Zero2Cool (2h) : Godwin remains with Bucs. Another WR that won't join Super Bowl run
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers will NOT re-sign Josh Myers, BillHuber
Zero2Cool (4h) : No Block, No Rock!
Zero2Cool (4h) : Free Agency day and Tweeter is down haha
Martha Careful (5h) : Pickens, no thanks...does not like to block and dumb.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Rodgers and the Steelers are expected to talk and explore a union. The idea of Rodgers playing for Mike Tomlin is in play.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Adam Schefter also saying few hours ago Rodgers Steelers
dfosterf (5h) : PFT Steelers considering Rodgers
Zero2Cool (6h) : I don't want him, but paying two WR $30m plus isn't good
Zero2Cool (6h) : Steelers and George Pickens. I wonder if he's available.
Martha Careful (7h) : Any intest in Van Jefferson? Steelers may let him go cheap.
Zero2Cool (7h) : Kupp probably traded eventually
Mucky Tundra (7h) : If Adams still has some gas in the tank, then Adams and Nacua should do alright along with whatever the corpse of Kupp can throw in
buckeyepackfan (17h) : Sorry 13 mil guaranteed.
buckeyepackfan (17h) : Aaron Jones resigns with The Vikings. 2yr 20mil, 12mil guaranteed.
Zero2Cool (17h) : Adams preffered west coast.
buckeyepackfan (18h) : DeShaun Watson wants a new deal! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
buckeyepackfan (18h) : Josh Allen extension includes 250mil in GUARANTEED money!
buckeyepackfan (18h) : Metcalf traded to The Steelers. Every year I forget this is Misinformation time. Have to quit listening to "The talking heads" 😀
dhazer (19h) : or do we tell them we take metcalf you take alexander lol
dhazer (19h) : I am curious about if we waste money on Metcalf he isn't worth $30 million a year
dhazer (19h) : Adams is going to a good team and gets to play indoors majority of the time can't blame him and isn't he from Fresno?
Zero2Cool (19h) : Rams land Adams of Davante fame.
Martha Careful (20h) : it's funny how guys who are so desperate to play for championships, at least so they say, just take the money.
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Semantics ;)
Zero2Cool (22h) : They didn't return. They didn't even leave! ;-)
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Crosby and Garrett return to their respective teams; truckloads of $$$ solved any problems they had
dhazer (9-Mar) : Russell Wilson will be back in Seattle as a bridge
Zero2Cool (9-Mar) : Bills are releasing pass rusher Von Miller, per sources.
Zero2Cool (9-Mar) : From trade to truce and beyond: the Browns and Myles Garrett reached agreement today on a record contract extension that averages $40m
TheKanataThrilla (8-Mar) : I could actually see Seattle inquiring about Willis.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

4-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

28-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

28-Feb / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.