You think thats going to hurt us, trying to close out games? Or do you think we can get the job done with the passing game?
"Zero2Cool" wrote:
I think having a OL that tries to finesse its way around allows the defense to have more energy in the 4th quarter. If we had a OL that punished a DL I just think we'd have a more productive 4th quarter running attack. Mike McCarthy made a excellent counterpoint to that theory and in support of the Zone Blocking scheme. I just don't recall it right now.
Idk the teams with great offensive lines, still seem to have something in the 4th quarter. Thats when their running backs are most effective.
Say what you want about the ZBS and the types of blockers it gives us, but since we've switched we have had extremely low sack numbers given up by these "smaller, mobile linemen." I don't have a problem with it in the running game either.
"agopackgo4" wrote:
ZBS has nothing to do with pass protection unless you're saying it's a personnel issue. If so, who do you want to get rid of? Wells and Colledge? Spitz too? That basically means a completely replaced O-line within a few years. If you want to see struggling, I suggest we go that route.
"MassPackersFan" wrote:
"MassPackersFan" wrote: