Zero2Cool
12 years ago
Nice attempt to derail a damn thread with the FIRST frickin reply! College staff always thinking the rules don't apply! :P

Trivia question: Which former President later became a US Senator? Which became a US Representative? And which became a member of the Supreme Court?

Wade wrote:


UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago
fairly easy
1. Andrew Johnson. After being impeached as President and the Senate failing to carry the required 2/3 majority by 1 vote he finished his term. Years later the State if TN appointed him Senator. This was in the period before the general population elected their Senators.
2. John Q Adams. He was once asked if he didn't feel serving as a US Representative was a step down after serving as President. I am paraphrasing his answer but he said serving the people of his District was the highest honor a man could ask for.
3. William Taft. The original big boy.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago
I don't see it as happening either. But speaking of US Senators, why not talk about that Wade?
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago
Dang it WPR. Here I had a chance to show off my History skills and you beat me to it. [boxing]
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡Ή πŸ‡²πŸ‡² πŸ‡¦πŸ‡·
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago

I don't see it as happening either. But speaking of US Senators, why not talk about that Wade?

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Er...what about US Senators do you want to talk about?

Term limits?

Hair styles?

Hypocrisy?



And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago

Er...what about US Senators do you want to talk about?

Term limits?

Hair styles?

Hypocrisy?


Originally Posted by: Wade 



I posted that comment over on the Murphy thread. Kevin got mad and moved it. [aiee]

he is too up tight. he needs to find a girl.

Strike that he has girls that is one of the reasons he is so up tight. he needs to find a woman.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago

Dang it WPR. Here I had a chance to show off my History skills and you beat me to it. [boxing]

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



I love history. Thought about getting a degree and teaching it when I was a Yonker. Decided not to. The way the State interferes with the curriculum and attitude of kids today, I am glad I didn't.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago

I love history. Thought about getting a degree and teaching it when I was a Yonker. Decided not to. The way the State interferes with the curriculum and attitude of kids today, I am glad I didn't.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Yeah, you don't want to be a teacher nowadays. The government treats you like a potential criminal and the parents blame you for their kids being losers.

I got a degree in it just before it started becoming completely politically correct. The 90s turned college History into a bad joke.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡Ή πŸ‡²πŸ‡² πŸ‡¦πŸ‡·
Pack93z
12 years ago
When I seen the post and especially with professor Wade at the helm.. first thought was this.

300 level social psych class we were posed this question.. and had to pick the question apart, decide upon a stance and defend it.

"If someone with multiple personalities threatens to kill himself, is it considered intimidation or criminal threatening?"

The question itself in reality to me, is not answerable with any definite conclusion.. but it was interesting to see the avenues of interpretation, justification and broad ranges of collective thoughts on the subject.

So to tie to the last couple of posts in the thread.. my opinion is that being a "teacher" probably could be one of the most rewarding jobs on the planet in theory.. or may have been at one time.

But the overwhelming majority of the teachers today aren't what I would define as a teacher.. they are a laborer putting in their time, ticking off the required check marks of the curriculum and waiting for the summer months to roll around.

It is that stigma that has found its way to attach itself to the dying breed of quality teachers left within the systems.. and slowly some of those are being turned into the time clock punchers.

That to me is why teachers don't hold the respect they once did.. like much of society it is being overrun by those just in it for a paycheck with as little effort as possible.

I was rarely challenged mentally in college.. instead it was a never ending string of remedial tasks that required effort and time, but rarely inspired learning, creative thought and anything more than a masked requirement for the professor to collect a paycheck without actually engaging the students.

Sad when one can look back at 4 plus years, thousands of dollars and only vividly remember a simple assignment or question as listed above. At least the psych classes dove into that world of thought and make you really think about the questions.. not just walking through the class like a mental zombie with just one urge to complete meaningless and thoughtless busy work.

Flip the script and place yourself in the professors shoes once the truly want to "teach".. how boring and uninspiring must it be to be held in charge of students that have become these mental zombies through learned behavior and try an get them to engage.. no wonder they turn into the clock punchers.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
zombieslayer
12 years ago
Love your post Pack, but I gotta answer the first part of the question. I think it's philosophical/religious as much as psychological.

Does a multiple personality person have multiple souls? If not, you're just sending one person to the after world (him or herself). So it's suicide. If the answer is yes, it's murder.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡Ή πŸ‡²πŸ‡² πŸ‡¦πŸ‡·
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (19h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas πŸŽ„πŸŽ
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
21h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright Β© 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comβ„’. All Rights Reserved.