zombieslayer
13 years ago

A lot of speculation here about Aaron's woman. Of course beauty is in the eye of the beholder. To be fair, we should all see a picture of each others girlfriends/wives for criticism! 😉

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



If I was making $8 million a year, my mistress would look WAY better than her.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
DoddPower
13 years ago

If I was making $8 million a year, my mistress would look WAY better than her.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



lol, your mistress, eh? This chick isn't a mistress though, at least not to Rodgers.
zombieslayer
13 years ago

lol, your mistress, eh? This chick isn't a mistress though, at least not to Rodgers.

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



No, she isn't. But he's a young studly guy who makes $8 million a year.

Like I said, if she walked down the Chico State campus, she'd be average - better than half, and worse than half. This may sound shallow (but so be it, I'm a shallow guy), but the thought that the greatest player in the NFL is banging what is equivalent to an average California college girl is kind of, well, not very inspiring.

Mass gets the biggest win on this thread though. Maybe she's got a negative pressure v.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

Man are you guys that dependent on looks in a woman?

Originally Posted by: coltonja 


No, but if you are making millions, you should be able to pull chicks who are not only smoking hot -- I'm talking in the top 1% -- but also have amazing personalities. If I, a broke, unemployed college student, can convince two women to be in a relationship with me at the same time, these guys have no excuse.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
13 years ago
Did any of you ever see the chic Roethlisberger boned/raped in Vegas? At least our retarded Steelers buddies can't weigh in on the conversation.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

No, but if you are making millions, you should be able to pull chicks who are not only smoking hot -- I'm talking in the top 1% -- but also have amazing personalities. If I, a broke, unemployed college student, can convince two women to be in a relationship with me at the same time, these guys have no excuse.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Perhaps some of the guys with millions prefer not to date a 1%'er because often times they feel they should have everything given to them on a silver platter. And in my experience, the hotter they are, does not mean the better lover they are. I'd rather take a 7 who is great in bed, than a 10 who is only eh so-so in bed.
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago
If she is 1% hot, she will never be convinced of her value outside of her appearance. 1% hot is a lot of work and it takes a very self absorbed and insecure woman to put that much work into it. Leaving you with an extremely high maintenance and annoying woman.

Personally, I gravitate to the smart strong willed athletic women. They have confidence in themselves.

If Rodgers had a 1% hot woman, he could never be sure she isn't with him for his money and fame.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
DakotaT
13 years ago

Perhaps some of the guys with millions prefer not to date a 1%'er because often times they feel they should have everything given to them on a silver platter. And in my experience, the hotter they are, does not mean the better lover they are. I'd rather take a 7 who is great in bed, than a 10 who is only eh so-so in bed.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




That's why you bone as many chics as you can prior to marriage, and then marry the hot chic so that all bases are covered. You get to produce beautiful children who have a decided advantage in life, you look like a stallion to your idiot buddies, and you don't have to look at an ugly chic forever, which sucks the life out of you. The saying "Beauty is only skin deep" was made up by a homely person - because in our society beauty opens doors and there is no denying that.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

If she is 1% hot, she will never be convinced of her value outside of her appearance. 1% hot is a lot of work and it takes a very self absorbed and insecure woman to put that much work into it. Leaving you with an extremely high maintenance and annoying woman.

Personally, I gravitate to the smart strong willed athletic women. They have confidence in themselves.

If Rodgers had a 1% hot woman, he could never be sure she isn't with him for his money and fame.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



Exactly. And a lot of times when guys say they've hooked up with or married some really hot chick... they're saying it to over compensate for the truth anyhow.

Not to mention, how many of those 1%'ers are just in it for the money? I suppose some of you if you had millions wouldn't care because hey, you can boast about your 'hot' girlfriend/wife that the neighbors are probably porking too! Dumbass's.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
13 years ago
I've certainly dated some incredibly beautiful women as well as some completely average at best women. I know I don't have to explain this to anyone, but sometimes a girl just really intrigues a man. That includes both personality and in bed. Some of the lesser attractive women I have fooled around with and/or dated have been absolutely AMAZING in the bed. Not only that, but they have been some of the most caring, generous, and all around best people I have known. It ultimately didn't work out with those women, but the experiences I had with them are still very important to me. I don't really think this chick Rodger's is dating is like that, but he's obviously enamored with her in some way. He seems to date around quite a bit anyway so he probably doesn't put a whole lot of thought into it. If he finds someone that is decent looking and fun to be around in the limited free time he has, he probably rolls with it. Good for him. Also, perhaps he likes this girl because she enjoys having a good time with Rodger's when he is available, but isn't clingy or annoying while he's taking care of his business. I am personally fairly independent and can't stand a women who turns to me for all her entertainment. A woman who can mind her own and live her life successfully outside of me is a huge plus. Hopefully that's the case here.

It doesn't seem like this girl is extremely successful either, but professional success and the motivation and drive that goes with it is another huge turn-on for me. I think a driven and successful women is mighty-mighty sexy!!
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
    Mucky Tundra (10h) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
    Zero2Cool (10h) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
    Mucky Tundra (11h) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
    Mucky Tundra (11h) : Who's Theo?
    Zero2Cool (11h) : How is Theo alliteration?
    Mucky Tundra (11h) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
    Zero2Cool (14h) : Oh, it's toe injury
    Zero2Cool (15h) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
    dfosterf (15h) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
    dfosterf (15h) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
    Zero2Cool (15h) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
    Zero2Cool (15h) : He's on Browns, right?
    dfosterf (15h) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
    dfosterf (15h) : Fleece 'em again!
    Zero2Cool (15h) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
    packerfanoutwest (15h) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
    dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
    wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
    dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
    wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
    Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
    wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
    wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
    dfosterf (23-Jul) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Other times, it's turtle ass
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
    beast (23-Jul) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
    beast (23-Jul) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
    beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
    wpr (23-Jul) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : SSL might be settled now.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
    wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
    dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    3h / Around The NFL / wpr

    10h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    23h / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.