[2011] Green Bay Packers at New York Giants

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

Green Bay Packers ( 11 - 0 )
[list]

Total Offense = 4th

Passing Offense = 3rd

Rushing Offense = 28th

Total Defense = 30

Passing Defense = 31st

Rushing Defense = 13th

Points For = 34.7 (1st)

Points Against = 20.6 (14th)[/list]

New York Giants ( 6 - 5 )
[list]

Total Offense = 11th

Passing Offense = 4th

Rushing Offense = 32nd

Total Defense = 28th

Passing Defense = 26th

Rushing Defense = 24th

Points For = 22.9 (17th)

Points Against = 25.2 (27th)[/list]

Click HERE to attack the enemy (New York Giants) forums!

Access Code:

brewers

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

azrunning
Guest

13 years ago

Continuing your streak of weekly errors, the Packers are actually 11-0.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

After what I saw Monday night, the Packers better shut the Giants down. It's going to be pretty obnoxious if, less than a week after the Saints mauled the Giants, the Packers allow them to have a career day. It wouldn't be surprising, though. The Packers allowed Freeman to look great for a day, so why would we expect them to shut down Eli Manning?

Oh, well. With a victory this week and maybe some help, the Packers clinch a playoff slot, if I'm not mistaken. That's the most important thing.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

Continuing your streak of weekly errors, the Packers are actually 11-0.

Originally Posted by: azrunning

](*,)

wpr
Preferred Member

13 years ago

GB offense: penalties 56 (3rd least) 411 yards (2nd least) Fumbles 11 (8th) Lost 5 (7th) Turnovers +15 (2nd) Sacks 27 ( 20th)
NYG offense: penalties 66 (11th least) 537 yards ( 6th ) Fumbles 14 (14th) Lost 7 (20th) Turnovers +5 (7th) Sacks 20 ( 9th)

GB defense: 81 (27th) 620 yards (19th) Fumbles forced 13 (19th) Recovered 3 (30th) Sacks 25 (14th) Int 22 (1st)
NYG defense: 77 (23rd) 666 yrds (26th) Fumbles forced 16 (8th ) Recovered 8 (4th) Sacks 31 (6th) Int 14 ( 8th)

Dexter_Sinister
Registered

13 years ago

Green Bay Packers OPR 126.4 (Oh Yeah) DPR 78.1 (8th lowest) Differential +48.3 (Best by 14.5 over #2 Houston)
New York Giants OPR +95.6 (6th highest) DPR 93.4 (17th lowest)Differential +12.2 (9th overall)

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister

Thank you Dexter. That was the stat I was looking for.

Here's another one:
Packers - #1 in Point Differential at +14.9/game
Giants - #19 in Point Differential at -2.3/game

And another slightly important one:
Packers - #2 in Takeaway/Giveaway at +15
Giants - #7 in Takeaway/Giveaway at +5

ZS's game prediction - we win 45-24. 🇦🇷 throws 4 TDs vs 0 INTs to solidify his lead over Peyton Manning's single season passer rating record. And we actually run for 100+ yards this time. (That last prediction I keep getting wrong, but even a broken clock is right twice a day).

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

ZS's game prediction - we win 45-24. 🇦🇷 throws 4 TDs vs 0 INTs to solidify his lead over Peyton Manning's single season passer rating record. And we actually run for 100+ yards this time. (That last prediction I keep getting wrong, but even a broken clock is right twice a day).

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

I seen "ZS" game prediction and thought, dude, what the hell, let me bury myself with my own...ooooh I get it, he's doing the holier than thou third person speakage!

Quit that, it confuses me! :)

The pundits are saying this is the most difficult game left for the Packers to reach un-de-feated.

Wade
Veteran Member

13 years ago

Those of you with more information here, a question...

What quality of DBs and pass covering LBs does NY have?

For some reason (probably a bit of apprehension about the OL against the NYG defensive front) I think this game is going to turn on how well GB does on 5-12 yard pass plays, quick slants/hooks/etc. Wouldn't be surprised if this is the game where Mike the Genius brings in another "new wrinkle to give opposing DC's fits), multiple TE sets with multiple TEs (not just Finley) as pass targets.

That and extra no-huddle.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

dfosterf
Veteran Member

13 years ago

#10

Our o-line is pretty-much sub-standard against most teams, imo.

The difference is that Rodgers has gotten very used to it.

I'm not bitchin', I'm happy with Ted FINALLY addressing the issue in the drafts, buy just sayin; it is STILL a weakness, mostly because he was LATE.I love Ted, ask around, but he was LATE

Did I mention that? 🤐

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Rude!

beast (2h) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (5h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (8h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (9h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet

beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22