[2011] Green Bay Packers at New York Giants

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

Green Bay Packers ( 11 - 0 )
[list]

Total Offense = 4th

Passing Offense = 3rd

Rushing Offense = 28th

Total Defense = 30

Passing Defense = 31st

Rushing Defense = 13th

Points For = 34.7 (1st)

Points Against = 20.6 (14th)[/list]

New York Giants ( 6 - 5 )
[list]

Total Offense = 11th

Passing Offense = 4th

Rushing Offense = 32nd

Total Defense = 28th

Passing Defense = 26th

Rushing Defense = 24th

Points For = 22.9 (17th)

Points Against = 25.2 (27th)[/list]

Click HERE to attack the enemy (New York Giants) forums!

Access Code:

brewers

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

azrunning
Guest

13 years ago

Continuing your streak of weekly errors, the Packers are actually 11-0.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

After what I saw Monday night, the Packers better shut the Giants down. It's going to be pretty obnoxious if, less than a week after the Saints mauled the Giants, the Packers allow them to have a career day. It wouldn't be surprising, though. The Packers allowed Freeman to look great for a day, so why would we expect them to shut down Eli Manning?

Oh, well. With a victory this week and maybe some help, the Packers clinch a playoff slot, if I'm not mistaken. That's the most important thing.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

Continuing your streak of weekly errors, the Packers are actually 11-0.

Originally Posted by: azrunning

](*,)

wpr
Preferred Member

13 years ago

GB offense: penalties 56 (3rd least) 411 yards (2nd least) Fumbles 11 (8th) Lost 5 (7th) Turnovers +15 (2nd) Sacks 27 ( 20th)
NYG offense: penalties 66 (11th least) 537 yards ( 6th ) Fumbles 14 (14th) Lost 7 (20th) Turnovers +5 (7th) Sacks 20 ( 9th)

GB defense: 81 (27th) 620 yards (19th) Fumbles forced 13 (19th) Recovered 3 (30th) Sacks 25 (14th) Int 22 (1st)
NYG defense: 77 (23rd) 666 yrds (26th) Fumbles forced 16 (8th ) Recovered 8 (4th) Sacks 31 (6th) Int 14 ( 8th)

Dexter_Sinister
Registered

13 years ago

Green Bay Packers OPR 126.4 (Oh Yeah) DPR 78.1 (8th lowest) Differential +48.3 (Best by 14.5 over #2 Houston)
New York Giants OPR +95.6 (6th highest) DPR 93.4 (17th lowest)Differential +12.2 (9th overall)

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister

Thank you Dexter. That was the stat I was looking for.

Here's another one:
Packers - #1 in Point Differential at +14.9/game
Giants - #19 in Point Differential at -2.3/game

And another slightly important one:
Packers - #2 in Takeaway/Giveaway at +15
Giants - #7 in Takeaway/Giveaway at +5

ZS's game prediction - we win 45-24. 🇦🇷 throws 4 TDs vs 0 INTs to solidify his lead over Peyton Manning's single season passer rating record. And we actually run for 100+ yards this time. (That last prediction I keep getting wrong, but even a broken clock is right twice a day).

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

ZS's game prediction - we win 45-24. 🇦🇷 throws 4 TDs vs 0 INTs to solidify his lead over Peyton Manning's single season passer rating record. And we actually run for 100+ yards this time. (That last prediction I keep getting wrong, but even a broken clock is right twice a day).

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

I seen "ZS" game prediction and thought, dude, what the hell, let me bury myself with my own...ooooh I get it, he's doing the holier than thou third person speakage!

Quit that, it confuses me! :)

The pundits are saying this is the most difficult game left for the Packers to reach un-de-feated.

Wade
Veteran Member

13 years ago

Those of you with more information here, a question...

What quality of DBs and pass covering LBs does NY have?

For some reason (probably a bit of apprehension about the OL against the NYG defensive front) I think this game is going to turn on how well GB does on 5-12 yard pass plays, quick slants/hooks/etc. Wouldn't be surprised if this is the game where Mike the Genius brings in another "new wrinkle to give opposing DC's fits), multiple TE sets with multiple TEs (not just Finley) as pass targets.

That and extra no-huddle.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

dfosterf
Veteran Member

13 years ago

#10

Our o-line is pretty-much sub-standard against most teams, imo.

The difference is that Rodgers has gotten very used to it.

I'm not bitchin', I'm happy with Ted FINALLY addressing the issue in the drafts, buy just sayin; it is STILL a weakness, mostly because he was LATE.I love Ted, ask around, but he was LATE

Did I mention that? 🤐

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (17h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (21h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (21h) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (22h) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (22h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (22h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (22h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (22h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (22h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (22h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (22h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (22h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (23h) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (23h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (23h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (23h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22