DakotaT
13 years ago



My problem with many of your posts is that aside from your assertion that others are sheep, you don't quantify anything. You'll make your statement once, people will respond in kind, and your subsequent retorts are a series of declarations about what a free thinker you are -- and that others are following the hive mind.

Originally Posted by: evad04 



Probably because I don't have time in my day to quantify anything with statistcs and deep analyzation of an issue. I take for granted those of you who do quantify can get the jist of my short from the hip opinions. That's my fault, I'll try and to better.

My problem with the said sheep is that they turn into a pack of wolves on someone like Nerd or me. Then I get taken to a pissed off state and I don't really give a shit about anybody's feelings. I'm a stubborn German boy and I'm not apologizing for that. There are a select few in here that I take extreme liberties with, but it's people I've built a repoire with over the years. WPR is my newest bitch - and maybe I'll add you down the road.

Dude, I don't dislike anybody in this forum, and everyone has value cause we're all like a family in here. But maybe sometimes the red headed step children; Nerd and me throw a tantrum. It still beats being our special Ed little brother Zero though.

Have a good day! Oh and yesterday was probably just a bad day. Mrs. D has a sinus infection, Mia needed a transfusion, my idiot business partner was on my ass, and my relaxion forum caused me stress. But I just got a full 8 hours of sleep so who knows what today will bring?
UserPostedImage
Silentio
13 years ago

My problem with the said sheep is that they turn into a pack of wolves on someone like Nerd or me.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



I don’t quite understand how questioning unfounded statements makes one a sheep... or a wolf... or really any kind of animal other than a human. If you go into a public forum, like this one, and state your opinions as an adult with freedom of thought, you have to expect that other individuals are going to disagree with you. It’s part of the social contract. That people are going to ask for evidence, or at least further explanation of a claim, is a given, isn’t it?

Tennis isn’t a very good metaphor for the give and take of a conversation on a forum because there are so many participants, but we certainly aren’t bowling around here. That is, I haven’t noticed that most of us are here simply to throw our opinions down the lane and see what we can knock down with no expected response from an opponent. If you want to be a bowler start a blog without comments. I hear wolves (or was it sheep?) stay away from bowlers.

we're all like a family in here. But maybe sometimes the red headed step children; Nerd and me throw a tantrum. It still beats being our special Ed little brother Zero though.



No, no this is a lot more like a online forum full of a bunch of anonymous Packer fans. It’s actually nothing like a family at all.
blank
DakotaT
13 years ago



No, no this is a lot more like a online forum full of a bunch of anonymous Packer fans. It’s actually nothing like a family at all.

Originally Posted by: Silentio 




Maybe you need to get more involved, or not, whatever turns your crank, Hoss.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

No, no this is a lot more like a online forum full of a bunch of anonymous Packer fans. It’s actually nothing like a family at all.

Originally Posted by: Silentio 



My daughters call me daddy. My friends call me Kevin. You can call me daddy.


[grin1]
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago
Actually, this place of Kevin's is *better* than a lot of families.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
DakotaT
13 years ago

My daughters call me daddy. My friends call me Kevin. You can call me daddy.


[grin1]

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




And the people that know you and love you call you Dumas'. 😝
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago

Who claimed JJ said he wouldn't go over the middle? In case you weren't following along, JJ bitched to the media that he wasn't involved enough in the offense. Is this another non-sequitur or are you just happy to see me?
I guess it's true what they say. Bitches tend to synchronize their cycles and end up PMSing all at the same time. Good thing I'm here to dish out the midol. xoxo

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


You said he should show more willingness to go over the middle. I just said JJ didn't say he was unwilling last Tuesday at the TDs for hope kickoff event. I thought it would be easy to follow.

If you are going to be intentionally obtuse, people will just treat you like it is your normal condition. If it was unintentional. Sorry, next time I use small words.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
It would be easier to follow without using every tom dick an harry's initials.
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago

It would be easier to follow without using every tom dick an harry's initials.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


T, D, and H's?
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Pack93z
13 years ago

Not factually the case.
1: Somebody asked me what I would do if I was JJ. I told them what I would do. One of those things is to show more willingness to go over the middle. Then pack93z insinuated that I was suggesting that JJ show this willingness in a press interview. This is a good example of the common non-sequiturs which are used by many pissy little shebitches on this forum when they cannot successfully win an argument on it's merits. In fact I was ripping JJ for taking his shitstained laundry to the press. Why would I suggest he do that even more?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Since I don't like it when I am basically called a "shebitch".. lets review and figure out where the error or mismatched thinking occurs.. follow along. I will outline it for you.. for ease.

I started with this..

The question posed is a lose.. lose proposition for a player.

Are you happy with not getting the opportunities?

If you answer it with no comment.... the speculation will run wild.. people and the media will fill in their own blanks.

If you answer it as you understand and are okay with it.. you will be painted someone that lacks the desire or work ethic. See Chad Johnson this week.. which is utter bullshit by the way.. and I am not a CJ fan.

And if you show your competitive side.. you are unhappy and possibly a distraction or complainer.

In any of the choices.. your going to get forked over to some degree.

I have no issue with his direction.. he was respectful yet honest that he wants more reps. He wasn't disrespectful or combustive.. he was direct that I want to see more action.. I am a player that wants to play.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



You responded with this..

You can't reward bitchiness. Especially on this team. Next time someone wants the ball, they go to the media. Mike McCarthy is not in the business of manufacturing TOs.
I predict JJ barely sees the field this week. If there's an injury, maybe he plays some special teams. After the game he comes out and thanks Mike McCarthy for his opportunity to travel with the team and contribute any way he can.
And BTW, evad is my pretty little bitch, and she likes it that way. XOXO

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Then I challenged that statement with simply answer that question if it was posed directly to you... to demonstrate that the question at hand can be attacked no matter how you answer..


Alrighty Nerd.. stick yourself in his shoes and answer the question posed...

What is reaction to only getting one ball thrown your way and a handful of meaningful snaps?

Just be careful.. because I will browbeat your ass with the answer.. [grin1]

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



You followed it up simply with 3 parts to that answer in a press conference... you know answer the question posed. You stated you would answer it as such.. not what you would do but how you handle said question.

1: cash my paychecks.
2: work on my over the shoulder catches.
3: demonstrate willingness to go over the middle regularly.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Here I demonstrate the angle in which I could write a biased article on your answer and ask just how you demonstrate willingness in a press interview to a direct question.

Since when can you demonstrate willingness in a press interview?

I could write a whole article on your greed in place of a winning attitude and your fragile confidence. Nothing more than a receiving Albert Haynesworth.. lol.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



So now I ask... Where does the non-sequitur aspect come in? Pretty clearly it came from you answering a post with what you would do not how you would answer the interview question.

Next time.. before insinuating that I am some "shebitch" that can't follow along.. get your shit straight ahead of time. I have the ability to discuss this sport without such a petty approach.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (43m) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (2h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (2h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (2h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (12h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (12h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (15h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!
beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Apparently, the editing is what pieces comments together. That Ted thing ... fake news.
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : LaFleur "opportunity that Ted Thompson thought was too good to pass up"
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Jordan Love pick was Ted Thompson's idea.
Mucky Tundra (19-Dec) : Kyle Shanahan on signing De'Vondre Campbell as a FA last offseason: “We obviously made a mistake.”
packerfanoutwest (19-Dec) : Alexander’s last season with GB
Martha Careful (18-Dec) : if I were a professional athlete, I would probably look to see who the agent is for Kirk Cousins and then use him
beast (18-Dec) : $100 million fully guaranteed Kirk Cousins gets benched for rookie
Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : a lower case b
Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : The real lie is how beast capitalized his name in his message while it's normally spelled with
packerfanoutwest (18-Dec) : haha that's a lie
beast (17-Dec) : Despite what lies other might tell, Beast didn't hate the Winter Warnings, it felt refreshing to Beast for some reason.
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : whiteout uniforms in general are pretty lame and weak. NFL greed at it's worst
Martha Careful (17-Dec) : The Viking uniforms, the whiteout uniforms specifically absolutely suck
beast (17-Dec) : Thanks Zero2Cool, looks a lot better now
beast (17-Dec) : Seems like someone has a crush on me, can't stop talking about me
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : Should be gooder now. The forum default theme went to goofy land.
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : What the hell
packerfanoutwest (17-Dec) : yeah beast hates the Winter Warning Unies
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Okay I'm glad to know it's not just something happening to me lol
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Zero, did you copy the Packers uniforms from last night and white out the board?
beast (16-Dec) : Oh crap, is the board going to the Winter Warning Uniforms too?!? It's all white on white right now!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
53m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.