James Jones 'bothered' with week one playing time· Page 7

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

My problem with many of your posts is that aside from your assertion that others are sheep, you don't quantify anything. You'll make your statement once, people will respond in kind, and your subsequent retorts are a series of declarations about what a free thinker you are -- and that others are following the hive mind.

Originally Posted by: evad04

Probably because I don't have time in my day to quantify anything with statistcs and deep analyzation of an issue. I take for granted those of you who do quantify can get the jist of my short from the hip opinions. That's my fault, I'll try and to better.

My problem with the said sheep is that they turn into a pack of wolves on someone like Nerd or me. Then I get taken to a pissed off state and I don't really give a shit about anybody's feelings. I'm a stubborn German boy and I'm not apologizing for that. There are a select few in here that I take extreme liberties with, but it's people I've built a repoire with over the years. WPR is my newest bitch - and maybe I'll add you down the road.

Dude, I don't dislike anybody in this forum, and everyone has value cause we're all like a family in here. But maybe sometimes the red headed step children; Nerd and me throw a tantrum. It still beats being our special Ed little brother Zero though.

Have a good day! Oh and yesterday was probably just a bad day. Mrs. D has a sinus infection, Mia needed a transfusion, my idiot business partner was on my ass, and my relaxion forum caused me stress. But I just got a full 8 hours of sleep so who knows what today will bring?

Silentio
Registered

13 years ago

#62

My problem with the said sheep is that they turn into a pack of wolves on someone like Nerd or me.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

I don’t quite understand how questioning unfounded statements makes one a sheep... or a wolf... or really any kind of animal other than a human. If you go into a public forum, like this one, and state your opinions as an adult with freedom of thought, you have to expect that other individuals are going to disagree with you. It’s part of the social contract. That people are going to ask for evidence, or at least further explanation of a claim, is a given, isn’t it?

Tennis isn’t a very good metaphor for the give and take of a conversation on a forum because there are so many participants, but we certainly aren’t bowling around here. That is, I haven’t noticed that most of us are here simply to throw our opinions down the lane and see what we can knock down with no expected response from an opponent. If you want to be a bowler start a blog without comments. I hear wolves (or was it sheep?) stay away from bowlers.

we're all like a family in here. But maybe sometimes the red headed step children; Nerd and me throw a tantrum. It still beats being our special Ed little brother Zero though.

No, no this is a lot more like a online forum full of a bunch of anonymous Packer fans. It’s actually nothing like a family at all.

blank

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#63

No, no this is a lot more like a online forum full of a bunch of anonymous Packer fans. It’s actually nothing like a family at all.

Originally Posted by: Silentio

Maybe you need to get more involved, or not, whatever turns your crank, Hoss.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#64

No, no this is a lot more like a online forum full of a bunch of anonymous Packer fans. It’s actually nothing like a family at all.

Originally Posted by: Silentio

My daughters call me daddy. My friends call me Kevin. You can call me daddy.

[grin1]

Wade
Veteran Member

13 years ago

#65

Actually, this place of Kevin's is *better* than a lot of families.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#66

My daughters call me daddy. My friends call me Kevin. You can call me daddy.

[grin1]

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

And the people that know you and love you call you Dumas'. 😝

Dexter_Sinister
Registered

13 years ago

#67

Who claimed JJ said he wouldn't go over the middle? In case you weren't following along, JJ bitched to the media that he wasn't involved enough in the offense. Is this another non-sequitur or are you just happy to see me?
I guess it's true what they say. Bitches tend to synchronize their cycles and end up PMSing all at the same time. Good thing I'm here to dish out the midol. xoxo

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

You said he should show more willingness to go over the middle. I just said JJ didn't say he was unwilling last Tuesday at the TDs for hope kickoff event. I thought it would be easy to follow.

If you are going to be intentionally obtuse, people will just treat you like it is your normal condition. If it was unintentional. Sorry, next time I use small words.

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#68

It would be easier to follow without using every tom dick an harry's initials.

Dexter_Sinister
Registered

13 years ago

#69

It would be easier to follow without using every tom dick an harry's initials.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

T, D, and H's?

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.

Pack93z
Select Member

13 years ago

#70

Not factually the case.
1: Somebody asked me what I would do if I was JJ. I told them what I would do. One of those things is to show more willingness to go over the middle. Then pack93z insinuated that I was suggesting that JJ show this willingness in a press interview. This is a good example of the common non-sequiturs which are used by many pissy little shebitches on this forum when they cannot successfully win an argument on it's merits. In fact I was ripping JJ for taking his shitstained laundry to the press. Why would I suggest he do that even more?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Since I don't like it when I am basically called a "shebitch".. lets review and figure out where the error or mismatched thinking occurs.. follow along. I will outline it for you.. for ease.

I started with this..

The question posed is a lose.. lose proposition for a player.

Are you happy with not getting the opportunities?

If you answer it with no comment.... the speculation will run wild.. people and the media will fill in their own blanks.

If you answer it as you understand and are okay with it.. you will be painted someone that lacks the desire or work ethic. See Chad Johnson this week.. which is utter bullshit by the way.. and I am not a CJ fan.

And if you show your competitive side.. you are unhappy and possibly a distraction or complainer.

In any of the choices.. your going to get forked over to some degree.

I have no issue with his direction.. he was respectful yet honest that he wants more reps. He wasn't disrespectful or combustive.. he was direct that I want to see more action.. I am a player that wants to play.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

You responded with this..

You can't reward bitchiness. Especially on this team. Next time someone wants the ball, they go to the media. Mike McCarthy is not in the business of manufacturing TOs.
I predict JJ barely sees the field this week. If there's an injury, maybe he plays some special teams. After the game he comes out and thanks Mike McCarthy for his opportunity to travel with the team and contribute any way he can.
And BTW, evad is my pretty little bitch, and she likes it that way. XOXO

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Then I challenged that statement with simply answer that question if it was posed directly to you... to demonstrate that the question at hand can be attacked no matter how you answer..

Alrighty Nerd.. stick yourself in his shoes and answer the question posed...

What is reaction to only getting one ball thrown your way and a handful of meaningful snaps?

Just be careful.. because I will browbeat your ass with the answer.. [grin1]

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

You followed it up simply with 3 parts to that answer in a press conference... you know answer the question posed. You stated you would answer it as such.. not what you would do but how you handle said question.

1: cash my paychecks.
2: work on my over the shoulder catches.
3: demonstrate willingness to go over the middle regularly.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Here I demonstrate the angle in which I could write a biased article on your answer and ask just how you demonstrate willingness in a press interview to a direct question.

Since when can you demonstrate willingness in a press interview?

I could write a whole article on your greed in place of a winning attitude and your fragile confidence. Nothing more than a receiving Albert Haynesworth.. lol.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

So now I ask... Where does the non-sequitur aspect come in? Pretty clearly it came from you answering a post with what you would do not how you would answer the interview question.

Next time.. before insinuating that I am some "shebitch" that can't follow along.. get your shit straight ahead of time. I have the ability to discuss this sport without such a petty approach.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (12m) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (13m) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (1h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (1h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (1h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (1h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (1h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (1h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (1h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (1h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (1h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (1h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (1h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (1h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (1h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (1h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (1h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (1h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (2h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (2h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (2h) : Packers will get in

beast (2h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (2h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (2h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (4h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (5h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (5h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (6h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (15h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (15h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (15h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (19h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS