Edited by admin, this is the last time I'm going to warn you, click the link and read it. No More Full Article Copy/Paste!
http://packershome.com/tabid/63/g/posts/t/13418/Forum--Can-I-Post-Full-Articles.aspx 

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Use Firefox, amigo. Has a spell check built in.

And Nerdmann I think can take care of himself. He and I substantially disagree on Grant's skill sets. No biggie. It's just he doesn't understand that I also like Starks and was thinking in praising Grant, I was somehow dissing Starks.

I love seeing Starks run people over. He's awesome, and I'm glad he was around in the Playoffs last year when we needed him.

I just believe Nerdmann needs to give Grant a little bit more credit. Grant's a solid RB and those numbers I put up proved it.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 

I also give Grant credit. He's adequate at what he does, which is getting yardage between the tackles. People say I'm a "Grant hater." So I say if that equals "Grant hate," then what you say must equal "Starks hate." I love you man. xoxo

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

If one were to compile every single post you have made on this forum prior to the one I am quoting and take the aggregate of all your praise for Grant, it would not equal what credit you have given him in this post.

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 

Among the many claims regarding Grant, Nerd has professed on multiple occasions that B-Jack was the superior RB. While not necessarily qualifying as a slander against Grant, I think it nonetheless demonstrates a serious case of Acute Analytic Perversion (AAP).

AAP is not lethal but it's still no laughing matter (though I confess occasionally I do laugh).

Originally Posted by: evad04 

Grant, Starks, Green and Kuhn for the most part will determine via production whom gets the most carries and when.

I happen to think Grants gets stronger (in a rhythm so to speak) as the game wears on.. IMO, he will be afforded the opportunity to take the bulk of the carries this season with Starks picking up the fringe carries and offers a change of pace. If he can't shoulder the load.. that may change rapidly.

Green, IMO, is the wild card and with his short compact running style, could steal carries as the season wears on from both of the other two. Personally with the limited time I have watched this kid, outside of the Packers carries he has gotten, he has an impressive running style.. short strider in traffic with good change of direction skills.. something both Starks and Grant lack.. both of them are power style one cut and go backs.

Green seems more dynamic.. and if he can be decisive with is lane decisions yet keep that style present I think he has a chance to be very effective for us. And through college he has shown a very capable receiver..

So.. I think Grant carries the bulk this season with Starks carrying the balance and Green getting specific game situation duty. Next season, I would not be surprised to see either Green or Starks be the main back and the other pulling Starks duty this season.

If Green develops on a natural path.. I can see us having a nice rotation for a couple of years with Starks and Green.. maybe then the Packers will explore a scat speed type back to compliment.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 

Check his stats. He busts longer (20+ yards) runs almost every game as he's got burst.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer