Actually he would most likely not be starting for any team in '13 (outside of an injury replacement) so Harrell wouldn't be looking for another team and GB wouldn't be back in the mix looking for a backup for Aaron Rodgers for a few years.
Originally Posted by: wpr
Why wouldn't Matt Flynn be starting in '13? I'm confused here. What?I think the Packers could trade Flynn, extend Harrell, draft another QB, bring him up for a year or two, then trade Harrell, rinse and repeat.
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool
The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close