Mason Crosby - 5 years· Page 4

Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

Right, and you can't put a blocked kick on the kicker unless it's an absolute line-drive. The missed kick against the Vikings was painful though and very intense and dramatic. My brother and I were at the game and had ulcers by the end of it.

Originally Posted by: peteralan71

The coach felt it was Mason Crosby's fault for the block.

Really, the protection had nothing to do with it, I know Alex Brown got his hand on the ball, but he was actually falling inside from what I saw. It was a poor kick.

Mike McCarthy wrote:

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

13 years ago

#32

Good move Ted.

Start locking them up!!!!

The more guys who stay with The Packers, the better off it is for the 2011 season.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Stevetarded
Registered

13 years ago

#33

The coach felt it was Mason Crosby's fault for the block.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I don't know what McCarthy was looking at but I have a hard time blaming the kicker when right when the ball is snapped the C is laying on his back and there is a rush of Bears players coming straight up the middle.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/green-bay-packers/09000d5d80d92c5b/WK-16-Can-t-Miss-Play-Bears-blocked-FG

Really now, the protection had NOTHING to do with it??

blank

mi_keys
Senior Member

13 years ago

#34

Originally Posted by: Stevetarded

That kick is probably on the low side, but the blocking is absolutely atrocious.

Born and bred a cheesehead

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#35

This guy makes some good point.

If you break down Crosby's FG % by distance, his issue is with kicks longer that extra points but inside the 40. That should be a kicker's bread and butter. When an offense drives the ball inside the 20, it's a blow to the team to not come away with points, be it because of turnover or missed FG.

He was perfect from 0-19. That's good. From 40-49, he was 12th. From 50+, he was 17th. I think that is also pretty good. At least nothing I would even consider complaining about.

From 20-29 he was 34th and from 30-39 he was 30th. That's horrible. On FG attempts that should be points for a professional kicker. 17 guys were perfect from 30-39 and 31 were perfect from 20-29.

"HankScorpio" wrote:

Greg C.
Registered

13 years ago

#36

This guy makes some good point.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

My question is, how many did he miss from those distances? One or two? This may be a case where the sample size is very small, and once you get past the perfect ones, there isn't much difference between the rest.

I'm not a Crosby fan. I think he is average or a little below average. But I don't think he's horrible.

blank

Stevetarded
Registered

13 years ago

#37

This guy makes some good point.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

I dunno, it seems a little bit disingenuous to say he was 34th and 30th from 20-29 and 30-39 and therefore - horrible when making 1 more kick in either category puts him tied for 1st.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#38

I dunno, it seems a little bit disingenuous to say he was 34th and 30th from 20-29 and 30-39 and therefore - horrible when making 1 more kick in either category puts him tied for 1st.

Originally Posted by: Stevetarded

Yep. Anyone who uses those kicking stats flat out to prove their point is foolish. I did it a time or two and then realized how stupid it was.

I think a more accurate comparison is using a group of kickers within 5 attempts at a certain range.

Pack93z
Select Member

13 years ago

#39

To put this deal in perspective, you know the press version of the contract with some "eye" popping attention grabbing numbers provided by the agent, the Bears just signed a punter (Podlesh) for 10 million.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

buckeyepackfan (2h) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,

buckeyepackfan (2h) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games

Mucky Tundra (3h) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋

Zero2Cool (5h) : I guess 3 games. Whatever

Zero2Cool (5h) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Kanata, seek help! lol

beast (8h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status

Zero2Cool (8h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha

TheKanataThrilla (8h) : That was terrible.

TheKanataThrilla (8h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.

beast (9h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent

beast (9h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime

beast (9h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing

Zero2Cool (10h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is

Zero2Cool (10h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true

beast (10h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management

wpr (13h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

Mucky Tundra (20h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (21h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (26-Dec) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS