DoddPower
14 years ago
I didn't get a chance to read every post so far, but I didn't want to comment on the Netflix thing.

First, we get streaming and Blue Ray / DVD's. We don't get a chance to watch more than 1-2 movies a week, but receiving the hard copies is best for most newer movies that aren't available via streaming, unfortunately. So it's worth it, and cheaper than the theater. Also, the increase in pricing for us with the Blue Ray option is only about $7 bucks a month. It sucks, yes, but not exactly back breaking if the previous amount was affordable. We like movies and watch almost all of them at home, so it's no unreasonable to pay ~$18.00/month for that entertainment.

Another point is I know several people who all use one Netflix account. For example, person A pays for the account and 3-4 other families use it. That's obviously a lot of bandwidth being transferred for one account and I'm sure many do this. I guess it could be considered stealing and perhaps that has some minimal impact on the consideration of price increases as well.

My main point is the pricing is still fair for the service I receive. That may very well change after another few price increases, but for the 'home-body' that watches ~8 movies a month (with the option to watch many more)for about the same price as one movie out, it's worth it . . . for now.

wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

I didn't get a chance to read every post so far, but I didn't want to comment on the Netflix thing.

First, we get streaming and Blue Ray / DVD's. We don't get a chance to watch more than 1-2 movies a week, but receiving the hard copies is best for most newer movies that aren't available via streaming, unfortunately. So it's worth it, and cheaper than the theater. Also, the increase in pricing for us with the Blue Ray option is only about $7 bucks a month. It sucks, yes, but not exactly back breaking if the previous amount was affordable. We like movies and watch almost all of them at home, so it's no unreasonable to pay ~$18.00/month for that entertainment.

Another point is I know several people who all use one Netflix account. For example, person A pays for the account and 3-4 other families use it. That's obviously a lot of bandwidth being transferred for one account and I'm sure many do this. I guess it could be considered stealing and perhaps that has some minimal impact on the consideration of price increases as well.

My main point is the pricing is still fair for the service I receive. That may very well change after another few price increases, but for the 'home-body' that watches ~8 movies a month (with the option to watch many more)for about the same price as one movie out, it's worth it . . . for now.

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



YEA! =d> Back on topic. A plus for you. We don't go to many movies either. It does cost too much and with all the cable channels we have why? We do go to the local drive in a few times a summer. It is nice to catch two shows for $7.50 per person.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago

YEA! 👏 Back on topic. A plus for you.

Originally Posted by: wpr 





http://www.packershome.com/tabid/63/g/posts/t/12962/What-to-Expect-from-the-Packers-First-Five-Draft-Picks.aspx  



Now.. personally I don't mind the change since we stream and little else. Most of the time.. the stream isn't movies but series from some of the abstract networks. Currently I watch a episode of Hoarders before sleep.. fascinates me how and why people live the way they do. Insane and disgusting.. but people seem to adapt to the lifestyle.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
This message is gonna fix this thread, or break the whole board.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

This message is gonna fix this thread, or break the whole board.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



yeah I tried to post earlier and it was all messed up.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

Netflix continues to take a pummeling from subscribers  who are so enraged by the company's unilateral decision to separate its DVD and streaming plans − and increase prices as a result − that they're threatening not only to cancel the service, but also showing up by the tens of thousands to blast it on Facebook.

Yesterday, we reported on the initial reaction to the changes, and by last night we'd seen more than 9,000 comments on the Netflix Facebook page, which has 1.5 million fans. (There are 23.6 million Netflix members in the U.S. and Canada.) By this morning, nearly 30,000 had registered the summer of their discontent with the rental service that used to ride high on the loyalty of customers who loved not having to pay late fees and receiving their discs in their mailbox. The red envelope was something of a little treat at the end of a long day.

But now, customers are seeing a different kind of red.

For many, Netflix's streaming selection, while growing and improving since it became a perk about four years ago, still can't get anywhere near its vast volume of DVDs. And because of that, folks supplemented their streaming plans with at least the one DVD out at any given time option, for about $10.

But with the announcement that the same service would cost almost $16 — about 60 percent more than what they're paying now — people snapped. In these tough economic times, this little bit of entertainment counted for a lot. And now, subscribers are demanding to be heard. We want to hear from you, too. Take our poll and let us know if you're going to follow through with threats to leave Netflix, or if you've decided against it.

We're wondering if people have followed through on cancelling, if Netflix will increase its instant selection to make up for those who will cut DVDs from their plans and if Netflix will cave to the torrent of negative reaction and restore its merged plans. We also want to know if Netflix deleted comments from its Facebook page, as some have indicated on the site. Some complained that they didn't even get the courtesy of an email and only found out through sites like ours, or on their Facebook.

We asked these questions and more, but we still haven't heard back from Netflix. We tried again this morning to contact them. We'll update when and if we hear from them.

UPDATE: Steve Swasey, vice president of corporate communications for Netflix, got back to us this afternoon and responded to our questions.

He said the timing of the price change was "appropriate" and that "$6 more is a remarkable value, a latte or two every month. For most folks it’s absorbable," adding Netflix was "sympathetic to those in terrible financial straits."
advertisement

But, he said, the reaction was "expected." "We anticipated some folks were not going be happy with the change. It didn’t surprise us."

Swasey said, "30,000 or so is a sub set of 23 million subscribers. They're not speaking for the majority. But, their opinion is important and we value them."

(We hope Swasey has invested in a flak jacket.)

For Netflix, he said, the separation of the plans was a consumer-focused decision that "provides a simpler, easier Netflix experience. Some people don't want streaming, some only want DVDs." He also said Netflix would be devoting more resources to DVDs, while also adding that Netflix's future expansions, such as Latin America, would be streaming only.

Streaming titles numbered about 20,000 a year ago, he said, and while he wouldn't reveal how much they've added, he did say it was "more than you can watch in a lifetime."

No word on how many cancellations will come, or have come, out of this, but Swasey suggested the company would provide that information when it releases its next earnings report on July 25.

"We would like those members to stay with Netflix, but the reality is people will leave. We'll make it up over time and the service will continue to grow. I don't want to sugarcoat this. We do expect a certain amount of people to leave the service," Swasey said. Besides, "Netflix members already go to Redbox, order cable, go to theater and Amazon."

He said everyone should have received emails about the changes, so they are looking into what happened with that. As for customer service being down yesterday, he attributed that to the extremely high call volume that overwhelmed their 800 or so reps. And as to accusations of deleting Facebook or other online comments? He says that isn't happening.

Check out this video that reports on how subscribers took to social media to express their anger:


UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

Netflix continues to take a pummeling from subscribers who are so enraged by the company's unilateral decision to separate its DVD and streaming plans − and increase prices as a result − that they're threatening not only to cancel the service, but also showing up by the tens of thousands to blast it on Facebook.

Yesterday, we reported on the initial reaction to the changes, and by last night we'd seen more than 9,000 comments on the Netflix Facebook page, which has 1.5 million fans. (There are 23.6 million Netflix members in the U.S. and Canada.) By this morning, nearly 30,000 had registered the summer of their discontent with the rental service that used to ride high on the loyalty of customers who loved not having to pay late fees and receiving their discs in their mailbox. The red envelope was something of a little treat at the end of a long day.

But now, customers are seeing a different kind of red.

For many, Netflix's streaming selection, while growing and improving since it became a perk about four years ago, still can't get anywhere near its vast volume of DVDs. And because of that, folks supplemented their streaming plans with at least the one DVD out at any given time option, for about $10.

But with the announcement that the same service would cost almost $16 — about 60 percent more than what they're paying now — people snapped. In these tough economic times, this little bit of entertainment counted for a lot. And now, subscribers are demanding to be heard. We want to hear from you, too. Take our poll and let us know if you're going to follow through with threats to leave Netflix, or if you've decided against it.

We're wondering if people have followed through on cancelling, if Netflix will increase its instant selection to make up for those who will cut DVDs from their plans and if Netflix will cave to the torrent of negative reaction and restore its merged plans. We also want to know if Netflix deleted comments from its Facebook page, as some have indicated on the site. Some complained that they didn't even get the courtesy of an email and only found out through sites like ours, or on their Facebook.

We asked these questions and more, but we still haven't heard back from Netflix. We tried again this morning to contact them. We'll update when and if we hear from them.

UPDATE: Steve Swasey, vice president of corporate communications for Netflix, got back to us this afternoon and responded to our questions.

He said the timing of the price change was "appropriate" and that "$6 more is a remarkable value, a latte or two every month. For most folks it’s absorbable," adding Netflix was "sympathetic to those in terrible financial straits."
advertisement

But, he said, the reaction was "expected." "We anticipated some folks were not going be happy with the change. It didn’t surprise us."

Swasey said, "30,000 or so is a sub set of 23 million subscribers. They're not speaking for the majority. But, their opinion is important and we value them."

(We hope Swasey has invested in a flak jacket.)

For Netflix, he said, the separation of the plans was a consumer-focused decision that "provides a simpler, easier Netflix experience. Some people don't want streaming, some only want DVDs." He also said Netflix would be devoting more resources to DVDs, while also adding that Netflix's future expansions, such as Latin America, would be streaming only.

Streaming titles numbered about 20,000 a year ago, he said, and while he wouldn't reveal how much they've added, he did say it was "more than you can watch in a lifetime."

No word on how many cancellations will come, or have come, out of this, but Swasey suggested the company would provide that information when it releases its next earnings report on July 25.

"We would like those members to stay with Netflix, but the reality is people will leave. We'll make it up over time and the service will continue to grow. I don't want to sugarcoat this. We do expect a certain amount of people to leave the service," Swasey said. Besides, "Netflix members already go to Redbox, order cable, go to theater and Amazon."

He said everyone should have received emails about the changes, so they are looking into what happened with that. As for customer service being down yesterday, he attributed that to the extremely high call volume that overwhelmed their 800 or so reps. And as to accusations of deleting Facebook or other online comments? He says that isn't happening.

Check out this video that reports on how subscribers took to social media to express their anger:

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Wow.. Seriously?! People need to get a life.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
"What's the big deal? Customers can afford it" is becoming an increasingly common refrain among vendors these days. It ignores the fact, of course, that real wages have been stagnant in this country for over 30 years, and that the average savings rate varies between negative and a couple of percentage point. It is also beside the point. Just because customers can theoretically afford every price increase that comes down the piked doesn't mean they want to or should have to.
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

"What's the big deal? Customers can afford it" is becoming an increasingly common refrain among vendors these days. It ignores the fact, of course, that real wages have been stagnant in this country for over 30 years, and that the average savings rate varies between negative and a couple of percentage point. It is also beside the point. Just because customers can theoretically afford every price increase that comes down the piked doesn't mean they want to or should have to.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Generally you are correct.

But in this case? Not so much. $7 a month for an OnDemand-like service that would cost me personally at least $70 a month from Comcast is a service that is almost highway robbery.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
DoddPower
14 years ago

Generally you are correct.

But in this case? Not so much. $7 a month for an OnDemand-like service that would cost me personally at least $70 a month from Comcast is a service that is almost highway robbery.

Originally Posted by: Formo 



Yeah, not to mention the points I brought up earlier about whole families using one account. It's easy, if any of you all feel so inclined to do so. All one needs is a log in name and password.

I would pay for Netflix 10 out of 10 times before paying for the movie channels. They play the same movies in loops for at least a week at a time and the selection is horribly limited.

Everything in life is relative, and Netflix is a pretty damn cheap option at the moment compared to the alternatives of expensive movie packages or theaters. I have at least a couple friends who ONLY pay for Netflix and don't even have basic cable. I'm not sure of exactly what basic cable costs, but I bet some options for Netflix are significantly cheaper.

I'm by no means arguing and supporting price increases, but so far, I can understand them in the context of present society and/or markets. Let's just hope it stays reasonable when their contracts are up for renewal. That should be what we are worried about, but a $7-8 price increase.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3m) : No.
dfosterf (18m) : The man carried us a lot of the time
dfosterf (20m) : I think a Kenny Clark tribute is in order
Zero2Cool (8h) : new site, text editor gooder even on phone
beast (8h) : Oh yes, sometimes they make using a cellphone tough. I just wanted to make sure it was the correct article, & thank you for pointing it out.
jdlax (10h) : I can't believe one of my teams went out and wablammo just up and acquired one of the best players in the world overnight
dfosterf (15h) : I do very much appreciate when Beast and others pick up my slack 😊
dfosterf (15h) : I accept Beast's admonishment regarding my failure to link stuff I reference. I simply never learned to link from my cell phone.
beast (15h) : That's not what your she said 😌, she said keep going 😏
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Anything over 4 hours means he needs to get to the hospital
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Someone might want to check on Hafley and make sure his erection has gone down
Zero2Cool (20h) : LaFleur texts "bleep me I cannot sit down"
Zero2Cool (20h) : YouTube has had me last hour or two lol
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Ugh this trade happened right as my shift started and it's killing me
Zero2Cool (20h) : Parsons wore 23 in high school.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers just cost Lions more money with Hutchinson too huh
Zero2Cool (22h) : That is fair by me.
buckeyepackfan (22h) : Kenny Clark is the player, 2 1st rnd picks
Zero2Cool (22h) : umm... what?
wpr (22h) : I am stunned
Mucky Tundra (22h) : RICKEY SCOOPS WAS RIGHT AGAIN!!!
Mucky Tundra (22h) : ITS HAPPENING
buckeyepackfan (22h) : DEAL IS DONE
buckeyepackfan (22h) : MICAH IS COMING TO GREEN BAY!!!!!!!!!
wpr (28-Aug) : Me do-ed it gooderly,
Zero2Cool (28-Aug) : Bahah, I was like WTF why isn't anyone posting on PP.com ... oops no one has permissions
dfosterf (27-Aug) : tell her I reckon
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Micah Robinson cut. Probable PS player tomorrow. Has to call mom back and t
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : New site so much better. Might make switch and deal with it.
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Mecole Hardman to our practice squad
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Nick Nieman from Texans our 5th linebacker. Special teams signing
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Looks like we signed Clayton Tune as QB3
wpr (27-Aug) : TKT people lose their minds over QB3. Point is almost none of them are ready that's why they are on the PS and other teams don't take them.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Unfortunately he doesn't seem ready to be an emergency QB.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : As a Canadian and a follower of Canadian University football. I am rooting for him
dfosterf (27-Aug) : I bet a lot of us will follow the Taylor Elgersma journey with interest. Personally, got a Kurt Warner vibe goin' on. I like him
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Not sure if either will be claimed though.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Tune or Hooker would make sense
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Clayton Tune cut by the Cards? Don't know if that's the guy, we shall see
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Per Bill Huber, the Packers will not be bringing back Taylor Elgersma or Sean Clifford on the practice squad, so a new third quarterback
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Schefter must have deleted his tweet
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Hopefully Jerry reaches under the seat cushions and ashtrays of his jet and scrapes up the 45 million apr and spares us further nonsense
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Have to admit the PO'd Cowboy fan videos would be fun to watch. Problem with draft picks is half their fanbase barely knows what that is
beast (27-Aug) : I think Cowboys fans are ready to get their pitch forks and burning sticks if Jerry were to trade Micah
dfosterf (27-Aug) : If Jerry traded Micah to GB, here in northern Va. they would have to quick build yet another data center to handle the internet hate traffic
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : its signing and trades that you don't hear about, other then announced
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : If you hear rumors about Packers sign or trade, won't happen. Not how they work
dfosterf (27-Aug) : 19 players in a contract year. Jones called loss to us worst loss in Cowboy history. Forget Parsons trade. Not happenin' Cap'n
packerfanoutwest (27-Aug) : The Packers, meanwhile, are the youngest team in the league for the third consecutive year.
dfosterf (27-Aug) : That it was darkest before the dawn in Bengals and Commanders before they got deals done
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
58m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

28-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

27-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

25-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.