DoddPower
13 years ago
I didn't get a chance to read every post so far, but I didn't want to comment on the Netflix thing.

First, we get streaming and Blue Ray / DVD's. We don't get a chance to watch more than 1-2 movies a week, but receiving the hard copies is best for most newer movies that aren't available via streaming, unfortunately. So it's worth it, and cheaper than the theater. Also, the increase in pricing for us with the Blue Ray option is only about $7 bucks a month. It sucks, yes, but not exactly back breaking if the previous amount was affordable. We like movies and watch almost all of them at home, so it's no unreasonable to pay ~$18.00/month for that entertainment.

Another point is I know several people who all use one Netflix account. For example, person A pays for the account and 3-4 other families use it. That's obviously a lot of bandwidth being transferred for one account and I'm sure many do this. I guess it could be considered stealing and perhaps that has some minimal impact on the consideration of price increases as well.

My main point is the pricing is still fair for the service I receive. That may very well change after another few price increases, but for the 'home-body' that watches ~8 movies a month (with the option to watch many more)for about the same price as one movie out, it's worth it . . . for now.

wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

I didn't get a chance to read every post so far, but I didn't want to comment on the Netflix thing.

First, we get streaming and Blue Ray / DVD's. We don't get a chance to watch more than 1-2 movies a week, but receiving the hard copies is best for most newer movies that aren't available via streaming, unfortunately. So it's worth it, and cheaper than the theater. Also, the increase in pricing for us with the Blue Ray option is only about $7 bucks a month. It sucks, yes, but not exactly back breaking if the previous amount was affordable. We like movies and watch almost all of them at home, so it's no unreasonable to pay ~$18.00/month for that entertainment.

Another point is I know several people who all use one Netflix account. For example, person A pays for the account and 3-4 other families use it. That's obviously a lot of bandwidth being transferred for one account and I'm sure many do this. I guess it could be considered stealing and perhaps that has some minimal impact on the consideration of price increases as well.

My main point is the pricing is still fair for the service I receive. That may very well change after another few price increases, but for the 'home-body' that watches ~8 movies a month (with the option to watch many more)for about the same price as one movie out, it's worth it . . . for now.

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



YEA! =d> Back on topic. A plus for you. We don't go to many movies either. It does cost too much and with all the cable channels we have why? We do go to the local drive in a few times a summer. It is nice to catch two shows for $7.50 per person.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago

YEA! šŸ‘ Back on topic. A plus for you.

Originally Posted by: wpr 





http://www.packershome.com/tabid/63/g/posts/t/12962/What-to-Expect-from-the-Packers-First-Five-Draft-Picks.aspx  



Now.. personally I don't mind the change since we stream and little else. Most of the time.. the stream isn't movies but series from some of the abstract networks. Currently I watch a episode of Hoarders before sleep.. fascinates me how and why people live the way they do. Insane and disgusting.. but people seem to adapt to the lifestyle.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
This message is gonna fix this thread, or break the whole board.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

This message is gonna fix this thread, or break the whole board.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



yeah I tried to post earlier and it was all messed up.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Netflix continues to take a pummeling from subscribers  who are so enraged by the company's unilateral decision to separate its DVD and streaming plans āˆ’ and increase prices as a result āˆ’ that they're threatening not only to cancel the service, but also showing up by the tens of thousands to blast it on Facebook.

Yesterday, we reported on the initial reaction to the changes, and by last night we'd seen more than 9,000 comments on the Netflix Facebook page, which has 1.5 million fans. (There are 23.6 million Netflix members in the U.S. and Canada.) By this morning, nearly 30,000 had registered the summer of their discontent with the rental service that used to ride high on the loyalty of customers who loved not having to pay late fees and receiving their discs in their mailbox. The red envelope was something of a little treat at the end of a long day.

But now, customers are seeing a different kind of red.

For many, Netflix's streaming selection, while growing and improving since it became a perk about four years ago, still can't get anywhere near its vast volume of DVDs. And because of that, folks supplemented their streaming plans with at least the one DVD out at any given time option, for about $10.

But with the announcement that the same service would cost almost $16 ā€” about 60 percent more than what they're paying now ā€” people snapped. In these tough economic times, this little bit of entertainment counted for a lot. And now, subscribers are demanding to be heard. We want to hear from you, too. Take our poll and let us know if you're going to follow through with threats to leave Netflix, or if you've decided against it.

We're wondering if people have followed through on cancelling, if Netflix will increase its instant selection to make up for those who will cut DVDs from their plans and if Netflix will cave to the torrent of negative reaction and restore its merged plans. We also want to know if Netflix deleted comments from its Facebook page, as some have indicated on the site. Some complained that they didn't even get the courtesy of an email and only found out through sites like ours, or on their Facebook.

We asked these questions and more, but we still haven't heard back from Netflix. We tried again this morning to contact them. We'll update when and if we hear from them.

UPDATE: Steve Swasey, vice president of corporate communications for Netflix, got back to us this afternoon and responded to our questions.

He said the timing of the price change was "appropriate" and that "$6 more is a remarkable value, a latte or two every month. For most folks itā€™s absorbable," adding Netflix was "sympathetic to those in terrible financial straits."
advertisement

But, he said, the reaction was "expected." "We anticipated some folks were not going be happy with the change. It didnā€™t surprise us."

Swasey said, "30,000 or so is a sub set of 23 million subscribers. They're not speaking for the majority. But, their opinion is important and we value them."

(We hope Swasey has invested in a flak jacket.)

For Netflix, he said, the separation of the plans was a consumer-focused decision that "provides a simpler, easier Netflix experience. Some people don't want streaming, some only want DVDs." He also said Netflix would be devoting more resources to DVDs, while also adding that Netflix's future expansions, such as Latin America, would be streaming only.

Streaming titles numbered about 20,000 a year ago, he said, and while he wouldn't reveal how much they've added, he did say it was "more than you can watch in a lifetime."

No word on how many cancellations will come, or have come, out of this, but Swasey suggested the company would provide that information when it releases its next earnings report on July 25.

"We would like those members to stay with Netflix, but the reality is people will leave. We'll make it up over time and the service will continue to grow. I don't want to sugarcoat this. We do expect a certain amount of people to leave the service," Swasey said. Besides, "Netflix members already go to Redbox, order cable, go to theater and Amazon."

He said everyone should have received emails about the changes, so they are looking into what happened with that. As for customer service being down yesterday, he attributed that to the extremely high call volume that overwhelmed their 800 or so reps. And as to accusations of deleting Facebook or other online comments? He says that isn't happening.

Check out this video that reports on how subscribers took to social media to express their anger:


UserPostedImage
Formo
13 years ago

Netflix continues to take a pummeling from subscribers who are so enraged by the company's unilateral decision to separate its DVD and streaming plans āˆ’ and increase prices as a result āˆ’ that they're threatening not only to cancel the service, but also showing up by the tens of thousands to blast it on Facebook.

Yesterday, we reported on the initial reaction to the changes, and by last night we'd seen more than 9,000 comments on the Netflix Facebook page, which has 1.5 million fans. (There are 23.6 million Netflix members in the U.S. and Canada.) By this morning, nearly 30,000 had registered the summer of their discontent with the rental service that used to ride high on the loyalty of customers who loved not having to pay late fees and receiving their discs in their mailbox. The red envelope was something of a little treat at the end of a long day.

But now, customers are seeing a different kind of red.

For many, Netflix's streaming selection, while growing and improving since it became a perk about four years ago, still can't get anywhere near its vast volume of DVDs. And because of that, folks supplemented their streaming plans with at least the one DVD out at any given time option, for about $10.

But with the announcement that the same service would cost almost $16 ā€” about 60 percent more than what they're paying now ā€” people snapped. In these tough economic times, this little bit of entertainment counted for a lot. And now, subscribers are demanding to be heard. We want to hear from you, too. Take our poll and let us know if you're going to follow through with threats to leave Netflix, or if you've decided against it.

We're wondering if people have followed through on cancelling, if Netflix will increase its instant selection to make up for those who will cut DVDs from their plans and if Netflix will cave to the torrent of negative reaction and restore its merged plans. We also want to know if Netflix deleted comments from its Facebook page, as some have indicated on the site. Some complained that they didn't even get the courtesy of an email and only found out through sites like ours, or on their Facebook.

We asked these questions and more, but we still haven't heard back from Netflix. We tried again this morning to contact them. We'll update when and if we hear from them.

UPDATE: Steve Swasey, vice president of corporate communications for Netflix, got back to us this afternoon and responded to our questions.

He said the timing of the price change was "appropriate" and that "$6 more is a remarkable value, a latte or two every month. For most folks itā€™s absorbable," adding Netflix was "sympathetic to those in terrible financial straits."
advertisement

But, he said, the reaction was "expected." "We anticipated some folks were not going be happy with the change. It didnā€™t surprise us."

Swasey said, "30,000 or so is a sub set of 23 million subscribers. They're not speaking for the majority. But, their opinion is important and we value them."

(We hope Swasey has invested in a flak jacket.)

For Netflix, he said, the separation of the plans was a consumer-focused decision that "provides a simpler, easier Netflix experience. Some people don't want streaming, some only want DVDs." He also said Netflix would be devoting more resources to DVDs, while also adding that Netflix's future expansions, such as Latin America, would be streaming only.

Streaming titles numbered about 20,000 a year ago, he said, and while he wouldn't reveal how much they've added, he did say it was "more than you can watch in a lifetime."

No word on how many cancellations will come, or have come, out of this, but Swasey suggested the company would provide that information when it releases its next earnings report on July 25.

"We would like those members to stay with Netflix, but the reality is people will leave. We'll make it up over time and the service will continue to grow. I don't want to sugarcoat this. We do expect a certain amount of people to leave the service," Swasey said. Besides, "Netflix members already go to Redbox, order cable, go to theater and Amazon."

He said everyone should have received emails about the changes, so they are looking into what happened with that. As for customer service being down yesterday, he attributed that to the extremely high call volume that overwhelmed their 800 or so reps. And as to accusations of deleting Facebook or other online comments? He says that isn't happening.

Check out this video that reports on how subscribers took to social media to express their anger:

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Wow.. Seriously?! People need to get a life.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
"What's the big deal? Customers can afford it" is becoming an increasingly common refrain among vendors these days. It ignores the fact, of course, that real wages have been stagnant in this country for over 30 years, and that the average savings rate varies between negative and a couple of percentage point. It is also beside the point. Just because customers can theoretically afford every price increase that comes down the piked doesn't mean they want to or should have to.
UserPostedImage
Formo
13 years ago

"What's the big deal? Customers can afford it" is becoming an increasingly common refrain among vendors these days. It ignores the fact, of course, that real wages have been stagnant in this country for over 30 years, and that the average savings rate varies between negative and a couple of percentage point. It is also beside the point. Just because customers can theoretically afford every price increase that comes down the piked doesn't mean they want to or should have to.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Generally you are correct.

But in this case? Not so much. $7 a month for an OnDemand-like service that would cost me personally at least $70 a month from Comcast is a service that is almost highway robbery.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
DoddPower
13 years ago

Generally you are correct.

But in this case? Not so much. $7 a month for an OnDemand-like service that would cost me personally at least $70 a month from Comcast is a service that is almost highway robbery.

Originally Posted by: Formo 



Yeah, not to mention the points I brought up earlier about whole families using one account. It's easy, if any of you all feel so inclined to do so. All one needs is a log in name and password.

I would pay for Netflix 10 out of 10 times before paying for the movie channels. They play the same movies in loops for at least a week at a time and the selection is horribly limited.

Everything in life is relative, and Netflix is a pretty damn cheap option at the moment compared to the alternatives of expensive movie packages or theaters. I have at least a couple friends who ONLY pay for Netflix and don't even have basic cable. I'm not sure of exactly what basic cable costs, but I bet some options for Netflix are significantly cheaper.

I'm by no means arguing and supporting price increases, but so far, I can understand them in the context of present society and/or markets. Let's just hope it stays reasonable when their contracts are up for renewal. That should be what we are worried about, but a $7-8 price increase.
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (3h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (14h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (14h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (14h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (17h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (17h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (18h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (20h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (20h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (20h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (20h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (20h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (20h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (20h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (20h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (22h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (22h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (22h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (22h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (22h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (22h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.