beast
14 years ago

Beast - for someone who claims to play chess well, you sure spell it funny. I was joking about the physical aspect of it. Yes, it's physical. It's a sport. But give me a quick passing team over a physical running team any day of the week (if the defenses are the same). I've said this many times. In order of importance:
1) D
2) an elite QB

An good RB is nice to have, but not necessary.

Now back to Ryan Grant - he's a top 10 RB in the NFL. Don't believe me? Check his stats. He consistently gets 1200+ yards and TDs. That's what matters.

As for 3rd and 5, if a Coach doesn't call passing on the majority of 3rd and 5s, he's a fool. No WRs open? Throw it to a RB and pray for 5+ yards.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



First off I said I used to be good at it. I've gotten pretty rusty at chess. And I've never been good at spelling or grammar but in that case, I was just thinking about something else =p~

I find it funny that the Packers are known for their offense and QBs but their two latest Super Bowl wins (arguable) the defenses carried them to them.

I think Grants stats don't tell the whole story... because he's a feature back while most teams stay away from the feature back because they prefer the dual roles of splitting carries. So he gets more yards than most guys because he gets more carries (and because it's good) ... sometimes a lot more carries.

That's why I wonder if yards per carry with a decent minimum number of carries (for a full season it would be something like 150 to 200 carries) would be a much better judge of ranking RBs or not... (of course blocking always comes into play as well...)

I'll look up the numbers from 2009... the chart below is from NFL.com of guys in order from their 09 averages or yards per carry (which is the stat on the very right)

I added only the guys that had both over 145 carries in 2009 and an average equal or better than Grant. If you look at the whole list Grant is tired in 15th. If you look at only the guys with 200 carries or more Grant is tied in 10th.


Name, Team, Position, # of Carries, Carries per game, Yards, average.


Jamaal Charles KC RB 190 12.7 1,120 5.9
Chris Johnson TEN RB 358 22.4 2,006 5.6
Pierre Thomas NO RB 147 10.5 793 5.4
Ray Rice BAL RB 254 15.9 1,339 5.3
DeAngelo Williams CAR RB 216 16.6 1,117 5.2
Jonathan Stewart CAR RB 221 13.8 1,133 5.1
Frank Gore SF RB 229 16.4 1,120 4.9
Michael Turner ATL RB 178 16.2 871 4.9
Ahmad Bradshaw NYG RB 163 10.9 778 4.8
Ricky Williams MIA RB 241 15.1 1,121 4.7
Rashard Mendenhall PIT RB 242 15.1 1,108 4.6
Fred Jackson BUF RB 237 14.8 1,062 4.5
Maurice Jones-Drew JAC RB 312 19.5 1,391 4.5
Beanie Wells ARI RB 176 11.0 793 4.5
Marion Barber DAL RB 214 14.3 932 4.4
Ronnie Brown MIA RB 147 16.3 648 4.4
Ryan Grant GB RB 282 17.6 1,253 4.4
Jerome Harrison CLE RB 194 13.9 862 4.4
Steven Jackson STL RB 324 21.6 1,416 4.4
Adrian Peterson MIN RB 314 19.6 1,383 4.4
UserPostedImage
StoicFire
14 years ago

Where does everyone get this idea that Grant is faster than Starks? LOL.
Alex Green is gonna look good. He's fast. One thing about the running game, imo: It's gonna help us on natural turf. We won the SB with a dome team. Yes, our home field is the frozen tundra. But it's to our disadvantage to actually play in those conditions. Go back and look last year. We blew out the Falcons in their dome. Then we barely squeaked by the Bares at the Mistake by the Lake.
These two new RB are gonna be the real deal, and they are gonna help us alot in those situations. Home field advantage, baby!
Both Starks and Green have more quickness, speed and vision than Grant. Not to mention their receiving ability.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Combine 40 times:
Ryan Grant 4.43
James Starks 4.50
Alex Green 4.53

This is one place we go to get the idea that he is faster than Starks. Also, he looks fast in games. He is explosive, and a good downhill runner. I don't have stats for quickness and vision, but I honestly don't understand the Grant hating. He's been a really good back for us since we got him (averaging 72.4 yrds/game as a healthy Packer). Don't take this the wrong way... I really like Starks too. It just feels like Grant needed a little defending.


"the Quarterback can run if he wants to, but with this rocket attached to your body... who would?" -Aaron Rodgers
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I don't think anyone is hating on Ryan Grant. I don't think he needs defending, his numbers do that for him.
UserPostedImage
earthquake
14 years ago
The simple answer to the question is: YES

Anyone who watched the games last year saw how dominate the packers offense was once Starks hit his stride. Without Grant they lacked a legitimate running threat. Sure you can argue how important running the ball *really* is in the pass happy NFL, but I think its hard imagine anyone would really think that losing Grant didn't have a huge effect.
blank
nerdmann
14 years ago
I flat out don't believe Grant's 40 time. Grant is a "between the tackles" guy. A bit of a long strider. Meanwhile, Starks can not only get to the corner, but he can make a guy miss once he gets there.
Grant also doesn't have vision and he can't catch the ball. Don't get me wrong, he's been a godsend. We had no RBs that one year, and he came out of nowhere.
But he's got limitations that these younger guys do not have, imo.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
I still have not seen Starks be as consistent or as good as Grant has been. Until that happens you are arguing a hypothetical. It seems the guy on the bench is always getting credit for something he has not done and the guy out there producing isn't good enough.

Regardless of your perception of Grant, he did get 4.4 per in '09 like AP and Steven Jackson. Nobody has ever tried to say those guys are not great.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
nerdmann
14 years ago

I still have not seen Starks be as consistent or as good as Grant has been. Until that happens you are arguing a hypothetical. It seems the guy on the bench is always getting credit for something he has not done and the guy out there producing isn't good enough.

Regardless of your perception of Grant, he did get 4.4 per in '09 like AP and Steven Jackson. Nobody has ever tried to say those guys are not great.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 





LOL. Come on now. You can have Grant. I'll take EITHER of those guys.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

I still have not seen Starks be as consistent or as good as Grant has been. Until that happens you are arguing a hypothetical. It seems the guy on the bench is always getting credit for something he has not done and the guy out there producing isn't good enough.

Regardless of your perception of Grant, he did get 4.4 per in '09 like AP and Steven Jackson. Nobody has ever tried to say those guys are not great.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



I wonder if it's because Adrian Peterson and Steven Jackson were 1st Round draft picks and Ryan Grant was undrafted?
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago

LOL. Come on now. You can have Grant. I'll take EITHER of those guys.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


You can take Steven Jackson with his 4.2 career average and declining production and I will take Grant with his 4.4 career average.

The difference between perception and actual hard facts.

I think it is kind of irrelevant any way. Changing running backs won't increase the odds of us winning another super bowl. Better or worse.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
beast
14 years ago

You can take Steven Jackson with his 4.2 career average and declining production and I will take Grant with his 4.4 career average.

The difference between perception and actual hard facts.

I think it is kind of irrelevant any way. Changing running backs won't increase the odds of us winning another super bowl. Better or worse.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



Yeah but those hard facts by them selves don't mean one is better in a real team game like football is.

Because you also have to factor in Steven Jackson was the Rams offense for a while. Other teams game plans where don't let this guy kill us, make the rest of the team beat us.

Grant on the other hand (at least while with the Packers) has always had a pretty good passing attack around him which other team defenses focused on, which took pressure off of him.
UserPostedImage
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (18-Aug) : We do have good depth at running back imo. Still so frustrating. Bitching about it is a futile excercise, which I plan to do anyway.
    Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Whoops, I thought Zero was saying it was a surprise the Brewers lost and not Lloyd being hurt
    Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Not a surprise; inevitable
    Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : Brewers streak ends at 14
    Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : SURPRISE
    Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
    Mucky Tundra (16-Aug) : CLIFFORD WITH THE TD WITH UNDER 2 TO GO!!!!!
    Zero2Cool (16-Aug) : 90 MINUTES UNTIL FAKE KICKOFF!!
    Martha Careful (16-Aug) : I think Ruven is a bot, but regardless should be stricken from the site.
    Zero2Cool (14-Aug) : Packers RB Josh Jacobs ranked No. 33 in NFL 'Top 100'
    dfosterf (13-Aug) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
    dfosterf (13-Aug) : a lower back injury
    dfosterf (13-Aug) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
    Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : With LVN that is; need to see what happens in the next practice
    Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : beast, reading about what happened, it sounded like one of those "two guys collide and are moving slow afterwards" type of deals
    beast (12-Aug) : I believe Musgrave has been injured every single season since at least a Sophomore in highschool
    packerfanoutwest (12-Aug) : Matt LaFleur: “Highly unlikely” Jordan Love plays more this preseason
    dfosterf (12-Aug) : Doubs, Savion Williams, LVN, Musgrave all banged up to one degree or another, missing one here I forget
    Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : RB Tyrion Davis-Price is signing with the Green Bay Packers.
    Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : zero help, dominated. preseason
    beast (12-Aug) : QB Jordan Love has surgery
    beast (12-Aug) : Martha said Morgan had a lot of help, I didn't watch the OL so I can't say.
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
    Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
    buckeyepackfan (10-Aug) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
    wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
    dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
    dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
    beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
    Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
    Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
    dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
    Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
    TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
    beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
    beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
    Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
    Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
    beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
    beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
    beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
    Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
    dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    9h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    18-Aug / Around The NFL / isaiah

    18-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    16-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / beast

    15-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    13-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.