beast
13 years ago

Beast - for someone who claims to play chess well, you sure spell it funny. I was joking about the physical aspect of it. Yes, it's physical. It's a sport. But give me a quick passing team over a physical running team any day of the week (if the defenses are the same). I've said this many times. In order of importance:
1) D
2) an elite QB

An good RB is nice to have, but not necessary.

Now back to Ryan Grant - he's a top 10 RB in the NFL. Don't believe me? Check his stats. He consistently gets 1200+ yards and TDs. That's what matters.

As for 3rd and 5, if a Coach doesn't call passing on the majority of 3rd and 5s, he's a fool. No WRs open? Throw it to a RB and pray for 5+ yards.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



First off I said I used to be good at it. I've gotten pretty rusty at chess. And I've never been good at spelling or grammar but in that case, I was just thinking about something else =p~

I find it funny that the Packers are known for their offense and QBs but their two latest Super Bowl wins (arguable) the defenses carried them to them.

I think Grants stats don't tell the whole story... because he's a feature back while most teams stay away from the feature back because they prefer the dual roles of splitting carries. So he gets more yards than most guys because he gets more carries (and because it's good) ... sometimes a lot more carries.

That's why I wonder if yards per carry with a decent minimum number of carries (for a full season it would be something like 150 to 200 carries) would be a much better judge of ranking RBs or not... (of course blocking always comes into play as well...)

I'll look up the numbers from 2009... the chart below is from NFL.com of guys in order from their 09 averages or yards per carry (which is the stat on the very right)

I added only the guys that had both over 145 carries in 2009 and an average equal or better than Grant. If you look at the whole list Grant is tired in 15th. If you look at only the guys with 200 carries or more Grant is tied in 10th.


Name, Team, Position, # of Carries, Carries per game, Yards, average.


Jamaal Charles KC RB 190 12.7 1,120 5.9
Chris Johnson TEN RB 358 22.4 2,006 5.6
Pierre Thomas NO RB 147 10.5 793 5.4
Ray Rice BAL RB 254 15.9 1,339 5.3
DeAngelo Williams CAR RB 216 16.6 1,117 5.2
Jonathan Stewart CAR RB 221 13.8 1,133 5.1
Frank Gore SF RB 229 16.4 1,120 4.9
Michael Turner ATL RB 178 16.2 871 4.9
Ahmad Bradshaw NYG RB 163 10.9 778 4.8
Ricky Williams MIA RB 241 15.1 1,121 4.7
Rashard Mendenhall PIT RB 242 15.1 1,108 4.6
Fred Jackson BUF RB 237 14.8 1,062 4.5
Maurice Jones-Drew JAC RB 312 19.5 1,391 4.5
Beanie Wells ARI RB 176 11.0 793 4.5
Marion Barber DAL RB 214 14.3 932 4.4
Ronnie Brown MIA RB 147 16.3 648 4.4
Ryan Grant GB RB 282 17.6 1,253 4.4
Jerome Harrison CLE RB 194 13.9 862 4.4
Steven Jackson STL RB 324 21.6 1,416 4.4
Adrian Peterson MIN RB 314 19.6 1,383 4.4
UserPostedImage
StoicFire
13 years ago

Where does everyone get this idea that Grant is faster than Starks? LOL.
Alex Green is gonna look good. He's fast. One thing about the running game, imo: It's gonna help us on natural turf. We won the SB with a dome team. Yes, our home field is the frozen tundra. But it's to our disadvantage to actually play in those conditions. Go back and look last year. We blew out the Falcons in their dome. Then we barely squeaked by the Bares at the Mistake by the Lake.
These two new RB are gonna be the real deal, and they are gonna help us alot in those situations. Home field advantage, baby!
Both Starks and Green have more quickness, speed and vision than Grant. Not to mention their receiving ability.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Combine 40 times:
Ryan Grant 4.43
James Starks 4.50
Alex Green 4.53

This is one place we go to get the idea that he is faster than Starks. Also, he looks fast in games. He is explosive, and a good downhill runner. I don't have stats for quickness and vision, but I honestly don't understand the Grant hating. He's been a really good back for us since we got him (averaging 72.4 yrds/game as a healthy Packer). Don't take this the wrong way... I really like Starks too. It just feels like Grant needed a little defending.


"the Quarterback can run if he wants to, but with this rocket attached to your body... who would?" -Aaron Rodgers
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
I don't think anyone is hating on Ryan Grant. I don't think he needs defending, his numbers do that for him.
UserPostedImage
earthquake
13 years ago
The simple answer to the question is: YES

Anyone who watched the games last year saw how dominate the packers offense was once Starks hit his stride. Without Grant they lacked a legitimate running threat. Sure you can argue how important running the ball *really* is in the pass happy NFL, but I think its hard imagine anyone would really think that losing Grant didn't have a huge effect.
blank
nerdmann
13 years ago
I flat out don't believe Grant's 40 time. Grant is a "between the tackles" guy. A bit of a long strider. Meanwhile, Starks can not only get to the corner, but he can make a guy miss once he gets there.
Grant also doesn't have vision and he can't catch the ball. Don't get me wrong, he's been a godsend. We had no RBs that one year, and he came out of nowhere.
But he's got limitations that these younger guys do not have, imo.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago
I still have not seen Starks be as consistent or as good as Grant has been. Until that happens you are arguing a hypothetical. It seems the guy on the bench is always getting credit for something he has not done and the guy out there producing isn't good enough.

Regardless of your perception of Grant, he did get 4.4 per in '09 like AP and Steven Jackson. Nobody has ever tried to say those guys are not great.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
nerdmann
13 years ago

I still have not seen Starks be as consistent or as good as Grant has been. Until that happens you are arguing a hypothetical. It seems the guy on the bench is always getting credit for something he has not done and the guy out there producing isn't good enough.

Regardless of your perception of Grant, he did get 4.4 per in '09 like AP and Steven Jackson. Nobody has ever tried to say those guys are not great.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 





LOL. Come on now. You can have Grant. I'll take EITHER of those guys.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

I still have not seen Starks be as consistent or as good as Grant has been. Until that happens you are arguing a hypothetical. It seems the guy on the bench is always getting credit for something he has not done and the guy out there producing isn't good enough.

Regardless of your perception of Grant, he did get 4.4 per in '09 like AP and Steven Jackson. Nobody has ever tried to say those guys are not great.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



I wonder if it's because Adrian Peterson and Steven Jackson were 1st Round draft picks and Ryan Grant was undrafted?
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago

LOL. Come on now. You can have Grant. I'll take EITHER of those guys.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


You can take Steven Jackson with his 4.2 career average and declining production and I will take Grant with his 4.4 career average.

The difference between perception and actual hard facts.

I think it is kind of irrelevant any way. Changing running backs won't increase the odds of us winning another super bowl. Better or worse.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
beast
13 years ago

You can take Steven Jackson with his 4.2 career average and declining production and I will take Grant with his 4.4 career average.

The difference between perception and actual hard facts.

I think it is kind of irrelevant any way. Changing running backs won't increase the odds of us winning another super bowl. Better or worse.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



Yeah but those hard facts by them selves don't mean one is better in a real team game like football is.

Because you also have to factor in Steven Jackson was the Rams offense for a while. Other teams game plans where don't let this guy kill us, make the rest of the team beat us.

Grant on the other hand (at least while with the Packers) has always had a pretty good passing attack around him which other team defenses focused on, which took pressure off of him.
UserPostedImage
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (23m) : Notre Lame vs Pedo St tonight and the Luckeyes vs Texas tomorrow
    Mucky Tundra (33m) : Stud
    Zero2Cool (2h) : E. Cooper. Rookie of Month. Defense.
    Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
    Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
    Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : HUMP DAY
    beast (8-Jan) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
    beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
    Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
    Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I could be wrong there though
    Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
    Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
    beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
    Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
    Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
    beast (8-Jan) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
    Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
    Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
    Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
    beast (8-Jan) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
    beast (8-Jan) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
    Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
    beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
    beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
    beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
    beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
    Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    37m / Around The NFL / beast

    17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    8-Jan / Around The NFL / beast

    7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

    7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.