macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/27501/breaking-down-tight-ends-green-bay 

Scouts Inc.'s Matt Williamson breaks down the tight ends of each NFC North team. Today: Green Bay Packers.

Jermichael Finley is not the best tight end in all of football yet, but he very soon will be. In fact, I am flat-out smitten with the guy. Finley is very special. I think he is a combination of Antonio Gates and Calvin Johnson and truly cannot be covered with one NFL defensive player. He is a receiving specimen without weakness. Finley began the season as Aaron Rodgers’ top option in an excellent passing game, but Finley was lost for the season in Week 4 with a knee injury. Just imagine what Green Bay's fantastic offense will look like next year when Finley is back in the mix.

After Finley went down last season, the Packers turned to a rookie, Andrew Quarless. Quarless has ability, but overall, he was a little disappointing. He looks like a backup who needs to become much more consistent and work on the finer points of playing his position. But rookie tight ends rarely flourish, so he could improve in 2011. Still, Finley caught as many passes as Quarless did last season, and Finley played only four games.

The Packers used a fifth-round pick on tight end D.J. Williams. Williams could seriously cut into Quarless’ playing time. Williams is an undersized tight end but was an exceptional college receiver. The Packers will probably get very creative with how they use and align the rookie.

Linebacker-turned-tight end Spencer Havner found the end zone quite a bit in 2009 considering his limited role in this offense. He contributes on special teams but was a complete non-factor on offense last season.

Tom Crabtree and Donald Lee were factors for the Super Bowl champs last season. But neither player is a mismatch in the passing game and both are now liabilities as blockers. Lee was cut in March, and it wouldn’t be surprising if neither player were on Green Bay’s opening day roster.

ESPN NFL North wrote:

Greg C.
13 years ago
Not much of an analysis. He doesn't even mention that the Packers drafted a second tight end, and he lumps Crabtree in with Donald Lee, even though they are very different players. (Lee: old, useless, and already cut; Crabtree: young, decent special teams player, quite possibly could stick with the team and improve.) I hope this guy didn't get paid too much to write this.
blank
PackerTraxx
13 years ago
Plus, all I read said Crabtree was a good blocker - no?
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Yerko
13 years ago
Crabtree is the best blocking tight end we have. Why does he say that he is now a liability? Am I missing something?
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago
It took Finley a year and a half to get in sync with the offense. I think Quarless should be afforded the time to understand it as well as Finley.

I think Quarless will catch on a little faster because of being forced into the role sooner than he would have if allowed to develop naturally.

Finley was working pretty hard on his blocking during the off season last year. Quarless was know for his blocking at Penn State. Crabbtree isn't out only TE that can block.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

Not much of an analysis. He doesn't even mention that the Packers drafted a second tight end, and he lumps Crabtree in with Donald Lee, even though they are very different players. (Lee: old, useless, and already cut; Crabtree: young, decent special teams player, quite possibly could stick with the team and improve.) I hope this guy didn't get paid too much to write this.

Originally Posted by: Greg C. 





I was thinking about the same thing.  poor limited analysis.



It took Finley a year and a half to get in sync with the offense. I think Quarless should be afforded the time to understand it as well as Finley.



I think Quarless will catch on a little faster because of being forced into the role sooner than he would have if allowed to develop naturally.



Finley was working pretty hard on his blocking during the off season last year. Quarless was know for his blocking at Penn State. Crabbtree isn't out only TE that can block.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 





Right.  People seem to think that GB is desperate to have their 2nd-3rd TE be all world in order to succeed.  They don't seem to want to factor in that Quarless was a rookie.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
13 years ago
Quarless dropped a few, but he did way more than Finley did when Finley was a rookie. Quarless doesn't have Finley's skills, but he's gonna be very good.
Another issue is that the Packers don't really have "TEs" in the traditional sense. We have "H-Backs." They play fullback and they run routes. It's kind of a hybrid position. So yeah, we've got a few, but we're probably gonna be cutting some FBs this year too.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
13 years ago

To me it looked like Quarless was getting down field and moving faster than Finley was.

That being said Quarless seemed to drop a ton of passes he's way and at points it seemed pointless to throw it his way because of it. (Also I wonder if he needs to get his eyes check because sometimes it looked like he'd lose track of the ball more than other guys).

Also Finley was playing in the system when they had it based around him. When he went down Mike McCarthy tried to plug in the other TEs but they couldn't do well enough so Mike McCarthy switched the system to focus back around the WRs and Quarless was then running a lot of clearing routes trying to go deep and get the attention of a Safety and get the Safety to follow him to open up underneath for the WR. That could of had a factor in why Quarless looked faster... because Finley wasn't running clearing routes (or who knows Quarless could be faster... he did run a faster 40 combine time then Finley as well as faster pro day 40)
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago

To me it looked like Quarless was getting down field and moving faster than Finley was.

That being said Quarless seemed to drop a ton of passes he's way and at points it seemed pointless to throw it his way because of it. (Also I wonder if he needs to get his eyes check because sometimes it looked like he'd lose track of the ball more than other guys).

Also Finley was playing in the system when they had it based around him. When he went down Mike McCarthy tried to plug in the other TEs but they couldn't do well enough so Mike McCarthy switched the system to focus back around the WRs and Quarless was then running a lot of clearing routes trying to go deep and get the attention of a Safety and get the Safety to follow him to open up underneath for the WR. That could of had a factor in why Quarless looked faster... because Finley wasn't running clearing routes (or who knows Quarless could be faster... he did run a faster 40 combine time then Finley as well as faster pro day 40)

Originally Posted by: beast 



He had 2 drops in 33 attempts.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
beast
13 years ago

He had 2 drops in 33 attempts.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



According to ESPN he dropped 3 in 34 attempts which is 8.8%.. which is tied for 8th worse in the NFL for TEs. According to ESPN.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/tag/_/name/andrew-quarless 

That was just during the season... the post season I remember in one drive Rodgers threw it to him 3 times and they all hit him and he didn't catch any of them. (I think it was bump and run coverage on the outside with a blitz so Rodgers was trying to hit the quick check down, but Quarless wasn't getting his head around to locate the ball in time). It happen once or twice they got the first and happen once or twice again... I think it happen 3 times a quick period of time.

They also switch Quarless role to be the clearer and run a deep route to get the safety to bit and have a WR run underneath route. Plus I'm guessing that doesn't count all the times he couldn't find the ball or tripped him self up or the playoffs. Such as the Flynn ST pass where he was wide open with a good pass and he so should of had it but tripped over himself or a couple blades of grass...


UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (26m) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (27m) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (28m) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (4h) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (4h) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (4h) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (6h) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (6h) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (7h) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (9h) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (10h) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (18h) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (18h) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (18h) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Game not over yet
beast (19h) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (19h) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (19h) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (20h) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21h) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21h) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21h) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (23h) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (23h) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Bears are finalizing a deal to hire Ben Johnson as their head coach. (via @tompelissero )
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Looks like Lions OC Ben Johnson is going to be the Bears coach
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : TD but another failed 2 pt conversion!
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Ravens still alive, but barely
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Or not...BUT THAT CATCH BY NACUA
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : WE MAY HAVE BEEN PREMATURE KANATA
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Time to make dinner
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Ouch!!!! Dagger for the Eagles
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : DAGGER
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : pass plays
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Seems some of their passes are too deep. Reminds me of MLF as well.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Oren Burks with a clutch pass break up...I will now light myself on fire
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : a run on 2nd down and 17 from McVay? So that's where MLF gets it from!
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Do or die time for the Rams
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Kicking field goals are impressive
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Oh that might be a backbreaker
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : That's what I thought too, just wasn't sure
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Kicking doesn't make much sense
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.