I am sorry but I am still upset that the brain trust in GB had the audacity to try to play 16+ games with only 2 RB. They have 20 years of NFL talent evaluation experience. They know that players are going to get banged up. Ever single team needs 3 quality RBs on the roster at all times. You need a 4th RB stashed on the PS and a 5th lurking somewhere in the unemployed line.
To pretend that a WR can fill the roll on a consistent basis is plain stupid. It has been tried before and it doesn't work on a consistent basis. You can have 2,3 maybe 4 plays for a WR. You can't have the 20, 25 plays a RB needs to be effective.
Originally Posted by: wpr