Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
I don't think the Oakland 'stain' will keep him out.

http://packersnews.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20110521/PKR07/110521029/Mike-Vandermause-column-Super-Bowl-win-can-only-help-Woodson-s-Hall-Fame-odds?odyssey=tab |topnews|img|FRONTPAGE

Signing a free-agent contract with the Green Bay Packers five years ago was the best career move of Charles Woodson’s life.

It led the veteran cornerback to achieve his long coveted dream of winning a championship. It could also result in Woodson one day getting inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

To say that Woodson’s NFL career has been revitalized in Green Bay would be an understatement. Of Woodson’s 30 interceptions in five seasons with the Packers, eight have been returned for touchdowns.

Woodson also has forced 13 fumbles as a Packer and recovered five more. He has been a dynamic big-play machine in Green Bay and a catalyst for coordinator Dom Capers’ highly touted defense.

Don’t think that Hall of Fame voters haven’t taken notice. Woodson’s five-year reign of terror with the Packers, combined with a solid eight-year career with the Oakland Raiders, makes him a probable, if not likely candidate to be enshrined in Canton.

“Woodson is not Reggie White, and he’s not Deion Sanders, but I think his credentials are better than some cornerbacks in the Hall of Fame,” said Cliff Christl, a Pro Football Hall of Fame voter for the past 10 years who has covered the NFL for nearly four decades. “I think he’s pretty close to being almost a certainty, almost a cinch.”

Christl, a former Packers beat writer and sports editor for the Green Bay Press-Gazette, is one of 44 Hall of Fame voters. He knows not everyone on the selection panel will share his high opinion of Woodson.

“I don’t think Woodson’s going to be an automatic,” Christl said. “You’re going to probably have to sell some people. But I do think he’s got a really strong chance.”

There are 15 cornerbacks in the Hall of Fame, although four of them also played safety during their careers. Only one has more interception returns for touchdowns than Woodson, who also ranks eighth among that group in interception return yards.

Woodson, a 13-year veteran, has 47 career interceptions, which is on par with Hall of Famers Herb Adderley (48), Jimmy Johnson (47), Mike Haynes (46) and Roger Wehrli (40).

When asked during a recent interview with AnnArbor.com how many more years he plans to play, Woodson replied: “As many as they’ll have me in Green Bay.”

That would suggest Woodson is capable of increasing his interception total to the level of such Hall of Famers as Mel Renfro (52), Sanders (53), Willie Brown (54), Darrell Green (54) and Lem Barney (56).

But Christl isn’t a big proponent of relying solely on statistics to select Hall of Famers.

“I don’t think it’s just interceptions,” he said. “Interceptions can be a deceiving stat for cornerbacks. Sometimes that means they’re picking on you. But some of the really special ones, teams just avoided throwing in their area. In that regard, Woodson’s a lot like Adderley. I mean that was Adderley’s forte, making big plays in big games.”

Christl maintains that Adderley, who played under Vince Lombardi during the Packers’ Glory Years in the 1960s, is the best cornerback in team history. He doesn’t hesitate to rank Woodson second best on the Packers’ all-time list.

“I talk to a lot of people — scouts, old coaches — and get their feedback, and I can’t imagine that most of those people won’t endorse Woodson (for the Hall of Fame) at some point once he retires,” Christl said. “And the other thing is just watching a guy play. Great players jump out at you. You don’t have to be a scout to watch a football game and determine who the special players are, and Woodson’s one of those guys.”

Even as Woodson’s coverage skills have declined with advancing age, he’s still capable of making plays and being a difference-maker.

“Next to Clay Matthews he was still the biggest play guy on that defense,” Christl said. “And they found a way to use him to take advantage of that skill.”

Some say Woodson’s tenure in Oakland will hurt his Hall of Fame chances. In five of his eight seasons he recorded just one interception. But he also earned four Pro Bowl berths and was part of the Raiders’ 2002 Super Bowl qualifying team.

“He came out of (Oakland) with somewhat of a reputation of being a disgruntled player, and having had somewhat of a checkered career there because of injuries,” Christl said. “But let’s face it, he was one of the premier athletes in the league regardless of what happened there.”

The fact is, Woodson was very good with the Raiders but took his game to another level in Green Bay. He has added three Pro Bowl berths and an NFL defensive player of the year award to his lofty list of accomplishments.

But nothing was sweeter for Woodson than the Packers’ victory over Pittsburgh in Super Bowl XLV, even though he broke his collarbone and couldn’t play in the second half.

“It’s a thing where from now on, for the rest of history, I’ll be a champion, always looked at as a champion,” Woodson said. “That says it all.”

That championship can only enhance Woodson’s Hall of Fame credentials in the eyes of voters.

“I think it helps any time you’ve got that on your resume that you won a Super Bowl, and particularly in his case because of the big plays,” Christl said. “He contributed big plays to a Super Bowl champion.”

GBPressGazette wrote:

wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
It is really hard to compare CB stats from different eras. The NFL throws the ball so much more today than they did 15 years ago. And like Christl says they avoid throwing at the better defenders.

That said I agree Woody has an outstanding chance of making it to the Hall. I wonder if he will get his number retired.
UserPostedImage
porky88
13 years ago
Greg C.
13 years ago

It is really hard to compare CB stats from different eras. The NFL throws the ball so much more today than they did 15 years ago. And like Christl says they avoid throwing at the better defenders.

That said I agree Woody has an outstanding chance of making it to the Hall. I wonder if he will get his number retired.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Actually, I don't think interception totals have changed all that much from the old days. They may have even gone down a bit. In the old days, they used throw downfield a lot and take their chances. When the West Coast offense arrived, teams began throwing mostly short passes. It is still hard to judge CB's by stats, though. There isn't much to go by.

As for Woodson, with the MVP season in 2009 he got over the hump and became a likely Hall of Famer. I think the championship last year just about sealed the deal.
blank
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

Actually, I don't think interception totals have changed all that much from the old days. They may have even gone down a bit. In the old days, they used throw downfield a lot and take their chances. When the West Coast offense arrived, teams began throwing mostly short passes. It is still hard to judge CB's by stats, though. There isn't much to go by.

As for Woodson, with the MVP season in 2009 he got over the hump and became a likely Hall of Famer. I think the championship last year just about sealed the deal.

Originally Posted by: Greg C. 



I guess I meant when teams ran the ball 75% of the time and threw 25% there were less opportunities for interceptions. Now that the passing game is predominate it changes the duties of a CB a bit.
UserPostedImage
Kingkoopa
13 years ago
Woodson is a HOFer IMO. The thing I wonder about, is whether or not we put his name in the ring of honor.
blank
macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
13 years ago


	TEAM 	S.T.
DVOA 	LAST
YEAR 	WEIGHTED 	FG/XP 	KICK 	KICK
RET 	PUNT 	PUNT
RET 	HIDDEN 	WEATHER 	NON-ADJ
VOA 
				DVOA 	RANK 						PTS 	RANK 	PTS 	RANK 	
1	CHI	6.3%	3	7.7%	2	0.6	-4.0	14.6	-0.2	26.0	-9.8	28	9.6	3	5.9%
2	ATL	5.4%	22	9.1%	1	4.2	13.6	8.7	0.0	5.1	4.7	6	2.3	13	6.3%
3	SEA	5.3%	15	2.0%	13	-2.3	11.6	18.3	-1.0	4.4	16.2	1	4.5	5	5.1%
4	BAL	5.1%	8	7.4%	3	4.3	13.5	0.8	17.4	-5.7	11.1	2	-0.7	20	4.3%
5	NYJ	4.9%	6	4.9%	4	-2.2	-0.1	19.4	14.8	-3.2	-16.1	31	-2.9	25	4.1%
6	TEN	4.5%	24	4.9%	5	9.0	-2.0	11.9	0.2	7.3	5.9	5	-4.1	27	5.2%
7	JAC	4.1%	25	2.2%	12	1.9	12.2	-1.8	8.6	3.0	-5.1	20	-4.9	30	4.4%
8	NE	4.0%	13	4.6%	6	1.2	-4.1	11.4	7.3	7.7	2.5	9	3.5	11	3.2%
9	ARI	3.3%	10	4.3%	8	9.1	7.3	13.8	0.7	-11.5	7.6	4	-5.4	32	3.5%
10	CLE	2.3%	1	2.9%	11	-1.1	12.5	-7.3	11.8	-2.1	-13.3	29	3.7	10	2.2%
11	DET	2.2%	31	0.5%	15	6.4	-1.4	10.9	-6.8	3.7	-14.6	30	4.1	7	3.0%
12	PHI	2.0%	2	4.4%	7	3.7	8.2	-9.9	8.6	1.1	-1.8	17	1.9	16	1.3%
13	OAK	1.5%	17	3.6%	9	3.5	0.8	5.0	9.9	-10.2	9.0	3	1.0	17	2.1%
14	STL	0.5%	11	3.3%	10	-2.3	2.4	-8.8	5.6	6.0	2.2	10	-0.4	19	1.9%
15	DAL	0.5%	14	1.2%	14	-5.5	1.2	-14.6	6.3	15.3	-9.6	26	10.6	2	1.1%
16	PIT	0.4%	30	-0.8%	17	-1.9	-2.1	3.8	8.7	-6.3	0.2	14	-3.8	26	-0.6%
	TEAM 	S.T.
DVOA 	LAST
YEAR 	WEIGHTED 	FG/XP 	KICK 	KICK
RET 	PUNT 	PUNT
RET 	HIDDEN 	WEATHER 	NON-ADJ
VOA 
				DVOA 	RANK 						PTS 	RANK 	PTS 	RANK 	
17	BUF	-0.1%	12	-1.7%	24	-0.5	3.4	-4.5	-0.4	1.6	-1.3	15	-1.3	22	-0.7%
18	TB	-0.4%	5	-1.2%	20	-0.7	-3.1	3.9	3.3	-5.9	-5.3	21	4.2	6	0.0%
19	MIN	-1.2%	4	-1.3%	22	2.0	-15.7	4.3	6.2	-3.7	-1.6	16	-2.3	24	-1.1%
20	CAR	-1.3%	29	-0.7%	16	6.4	6.3	-9.5	-9.0	-1.7	-6.3	23	-4.2	28	-1.0%
21	NO	-1.3%	28	-1.6%	23	-6.1	1.4	-3.3	4.1	-3.9	2.2	11	2.4	12	-0.5%
22	SF	-1.4%	19	-1.3%	21	-1.3	-11.8	-5.0	4.9	5.1	-9.6	27	3.9	8	-1.7%
23	HOU	-1.5%	7	-1.8%	25	9.2	1.6	-10.0	-4.5	-4.9	4.3	7	-1.1	21	-1.0%
24	KC	-1.8%	26	-3.8%	30	-2.8	-2.3	-9.1	-1.5	5.3	1.5	13	-5.4	31	-2.0%
25	WAS	-1.9%	23	-2.1%	26	-16.6	17.0	6.9	-22.1	3.4	-5.7	22	-4.7	29	-2.2%
26	GB	-2.1%	32	-0.8%	18	-0.1	-7.0	-6.1	3.5	-2.4	3.1	8	2.0	15	-2.6%
27	DEN	-2.2%	18	-0.9%	19	2.4	-4.5	2.9	-13.0	-0.6	1.8	12	0.9	18	-0.6%
28	CIN	-3.0%	21	-3.4%	29	-7.4	-11.2	-3.5	8.7	-4.3	-9.5	25	2.0	14	-3.6%
29	MIA	-3.1%	9	-2.3%	27	-2.0	-7.7	-3.6	-4.1	-1.0	-17.6	32	11.2	1	-3.0%
30	NYG	-4.9%	27	-3.8%	31	-0.7	3.4	-7.9	-15.6	-8.2	-4.2	19	5.2	4	-5.5%
31	IND	-5.4%	20	-6.3%	32	6.9	-3.4	-17.6	-8.1	-9.5	-7.8	24	3.9	9	-4.4%
32	SD	-8.6%	16	-2.4%	28	1.5	-17.7	-3.5	-34.3	3.2	-3.8	18	-2.2	23	-8.2%
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

Woodson is a HOFer IMO. The thing I wonder about, is whether or not we put his name in the ring of honor.

Originally Posted by: Kingkoopa 



I was too until I saw somewhere that all the HOFers are on the ring of honor.
UserPostedImage
Kingkoopa
13 years ago

I was too until I saw somewhere that all the HOFers are on the ring of honor.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Oh really! I didn't know that, but that means Sharper might get into the ring of honor 🤨
blank
Greg C.
13 years ago

I guess I meant when teams ran the ball 75% of the time and threw 25% there were less opportunities for interceptions. Now that the passing game is predominate it changes the duties of a CB a bit.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



But opportunities for interceptions have actually declined a bit even though teams pass more, because for the most part the passes are less risky. Also, the rules are not nearly as favorable for DB's as they used to be. They are often penalized for even the slightest contact.

Take a look at the career leaders in interceptions. There are lots of older players here, even though they had shorter seasons back then:

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/def_int_career.htm 

This suggests that Charles Woodson's high interception total is not a byproduct of his era.
blank
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (5m) : I guess 3 games. Whatever
Zero2Cool (19m) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.
Zero2Cool (27m) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Kanata, seek help! lol
beast (3h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (3h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (3h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (3h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (4h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (4h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (4h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (5h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (5h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (5h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (8h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (15h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (16h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (22h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (22h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.