Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Well, I agree with Rex Ryan. We couldn't stop their offense last year at all. Their mighty mighty offense completely overpowered and overwhelmed our D. That game was so painful to watch, I think I turned it off. I'm sooo scared of the Jets, it's not even funny.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



It was a definite nail bitter for sure. With all the points the Jets scored, the Packers were lucky to win by 9.

I wonder why I'm not seeing any mention of how much more dominate the Packers offense is on turf rather than grass, of which they played on against the Jets, at the Jet's HOME stadium too.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

Well, I agree with Rex Ryan. We couldn't stop their offense last year at all. Their mighty mighty offense completely overpowered and overwhelmed our D. That game was so painful to watch, I think I turned it off. I'm sooo scared of the Jets, it's not even funny.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



It was a definite nail bitter for sure. With all the points the Jets scored, the Packers were lucky to win by 9.

I wonder why I'm not seeing any mention of how much more dominate the Packers offense is on turf rather than grass, of which they played on against the Jets, at the Jet's HOME stadium too.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



It would have been fun to play NYJ in the regular season again this year. If only to keep their butts around and around.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago
Guys guys guys. How sarcastic do I have to be before anyone realizes my sarcasm? We shut their sorry asses out.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

Guys guys guys. How sarcastic do I have to be before anyone realizes my sarcasm? We shut their sorry asses out.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



*In the spirit of the Saturday Night Live skit on the 25th anniversary of President Kennedy's assassination.*

WHAT!!?? A SHUT OUT??!! That means we almost lost to the Jet's.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Guys guys guys. How sarcastic do I have to be before anyone realizes my sarcasm? We shut their sorry asses out.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I thought I was transparent with my understanding of it being sarcasm.
UserPostedImage
13 years ago
I think I have a 100% rate of people missing my sarcasm on this board. We need a sarcasm font.

Anyway, I love this. Only losers talk about ifs and buts in this context. Yeah, if you were a good enough team to beat Pittsburgh and played a PERFECT game against GB, you may have won. And if your wife had 4 feet you would never leave the house. Neither are true, sadly for you.
UserPostedImage
Yerko
13 years ago
Dear Rex Ryan,

Open mouth, insert wife's foot.

Sincerely,
Packers fans
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

I think I have a 100% rate of people missing my sarcasm on this board. We need a sarcasm font.

Anyway, I love this. Only losers talk about ifs and buts in this context. Yeah, if you were a good enough team to beat Pittsburgh and played a PERFECT game against GB, you may have won. And if your wife had 4 feet you would never leave the house. Neither are true, sadly for you.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



If people don't use :sarcasm: what the hell makes you think they'll use a FONT? lol
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

I think I have a 100% rate of people missing my sarcasm on this board. We need a sarcasm font.

Anyway, I love this. Only losers talk about ifs and buts in this context. Yeah, if you were a good enough team to beat Pittsburgh and played a PERFECT game against GB, you may have won. And if your wife had 4 feet you would never leave the house. Neither are true, sadly for you.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



If people don't use :sarcasm: what the hell makes you think they'll use a FONT? lol

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



Font rule smilies drool. :sarcasm:
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago
How obvious does one have to get though? Come on. We shut them out. I make a joke about us being completely unable to stop their O and people don't get I'm sarcastic? I didn't think I needed to display that "Sarcasm Alert" little dude.

Mass - That's because you're from Mass. People there talk funny. I can't understand your accent half the time.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (12h) : Merry Christmas ๐ŸŽ„๐ŸŽ
beast (20h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright ยฉ 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comโ„ข. All Rights Reserved.