We could always just keep barnett for a solid rotation piece/depth just for shits n giggles. You know, just in case we have 16 guys on IR next year. Nah, that will never happen.
"gbguy20" wrote:
"Stevetarded" wrote:
Sweet. Now we can use Barnett as ammo in the draft. Take out the garbage, Ted!
"nerdmann" wrote:
On the other hand Woodson has talked about how Barnett goes 100% in practice and it reminds Woodson he needs to go harder in practice...So the call could go ether way IMO... even more so if someone offers a good draft pick or something good for him.
"beast" wrote:
ya I dont know whom would be better hawk or barnett; I know I dont like barnett's off the field antics ... but if you guys remember they both had realy high tackles when they played.I dont see us keeping both ... I used to like barnett more till he kept going on IR and his twitter stuff
"Dulak" wrote:
The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close