Pack93z
14 years ago


Certain people on this board will probably be thinking "I'm not going to comment here because Zombieslayer might see this thread."

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Possibly, because even when provided with visual evidence some won't acknowledge it. Seen it personally in a thread, but then was accused that I couldn't admit I was wrong and told I only see what I want to see. ;)

But that is for another day.. but ear marked.

This much I will say.. it will be a mistake to think that we will be able to only spread them out all day long, because sooner or later LeBeau will make some adjustments and start taking things away.. and applying heat.

If you want Rodgers to make it through this game, we better attempt to run the ball enough to pause that pass rush, we better vary up the formations enough to keep their personnel off balance, and we better make it more difficult on Harrison and Woodley than to allow that to release free in pass rush. Otherwise.. Rodgers might get the ball away.. but he might be picking up teeth after the game.. if he makes it to the end that is.

Watching film on the Steelers will show you that even the slightest threat of the run will suck Farrior and Timmons in and expose the middle of the field. I highly suspect that the Packers are going to focus on Timmons especially because watching him play he is the weakest of the backers in coverage, but playing in the middle he is dropping often. Even the threat of the run is going to help open that shallow middle up and give Rodgers a place to go on a hot read with Timmons biting up and then slow to recover.. Farrior seems a little quicker to identify and drop.

That said, I do think the Steelers weakness is their corner play.. and in this game the situation should dictate to attack that weakness. And there will be plenty of opportunity to expose them.

But the game of football and the game inside that game is much deeper than pass, pass again and pass some more. It is what you are dictating to the defense that opens things up for your bread and butter, which this season is our passing game.

I expect us to struggle to run the ball for a high YPC.. but I expect us to put in the attempts similar to post the Lions game. IMO.. it was that game where MM realized that he has to mix up play calling enough and varying the looks in which he ran the ball enough to truly open the passing offense up.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
warhawk
14 years ago
I suspect you will see the Packers in formations with three receivers on one side and one going in motion. This will cause the Steelers into fairly straight up coverages. From there Rodgers can see where the defenders are he does not want to throw towards and get the ball out quickly to a receiver guarded by one of the weaker DB's.

McCarthy will no doubt keep running it even though it might not do much but I think we will see more pass plays that are essentially like a run. I am quite certain Rodgers will put it up at least 40 times but very few deep shots downfield.

This has been the proven recipe used by teams successful against the Steelers over the last couple of years and fits right into what the Packers do best.
"The train is leaving the station."
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
It is not all bad when you have a QB and receiving corps like GB does that is for sure.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
14 years ago
I'm hoping the Packers have 25-30 rushing attempts.
I just don't see this being a high scoring game.
Run the damn ball and set up the pass plays to win the game.
zombieslayer
14 years ago



Possibly, because even when provided with visual evidence some won't acknowledge it. Seen it personally in a thread, but then was accused that I couldn't admit I was wrong and told I only see what I want to see. ;)

But that is for another day.. but ear marked.

This much I will say.. it will be a mistake to think that we will be able to only spread them out all day long, because sooner or later LeBeau will make some adjustments and start taking things away.. and applying heat.

If you want Rodgers to make it through this game, we better attempt to run the ball enough to pause that pass rush, we better vary up the formations enough to keep their personnel off balance, and we better make it more difficult on Harrison and Woodley than to allow that to release free in pass rush. Otherwise.. Rodgers might get the ball away.. but he might be picking up teeth after the game.. if he makes it to the end that is.

Watching film on the Steelers will show you that even the slightest threat of the run will suck Farrior and Timmons in and expose the middle of the field. I highly suspect that the Packers are going to focus on Timmons especially because watching him play he is the weakest of the backers in coverage, but playing in the middle he is dropping often. Even the threat of the run is going to help open that shallow middle up and give Rodgers a place to go on a hot read with Timmons biting up and then slow to recover.. Farrior seems a little quicker to identify and drop.

That said, I do think the Steelers weakness is their corner play.. and in this game the situation should dictate to attack that weakness. And there will be plenty of opportunity to expose them.

But the game of football and the game inside that game is much deeper than pass, pass again and pass some more. It is what you are dictating to the defense that opens things up for your bread and butter, which this season is our passing game.

I expect us to struggle to run the ball for a high YPC.. but I expect us to put in the attempts similar to post the Lions game. IMO.. it was that game where Mike McCarthy realized that he has to mix up play calling enough and varying the looks in which he ran the ball enough to truly open the passing offense up.

"Pack93z" wrote:



The way to beat the Steelers is through the air. Look at their losses. Flacco was more successful than their running game and put up the ball 37 times. The Saints put it up 44 times vs 21 runs (which went absolutely nowhere - hard to run against the Steelers D). The Patriots passed 43 times and Brady lit them up. The one TD rushing the Pats had was Tom Brady sneaking in (which surprised me as Brady doesn't want to mess up his hair).

The stats speak for themselves.

Rosenthal is right. Coincidently, he agrees with me. :pottytrain2:
(I just hope MM does too).

And no, folks, Aaron's not going to die.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/pit/2010.htm  Click on the losses. They have one thing in common - heavy passing vs lite running.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Pack93z
14 years ago
Zombie.. I agree that we will make our hay passing the ball, lost in all this discussion is that we agree on that principle. If you would read past your bias against the run, you would see we agree on how to rack up points and move the ball..

The disconnect comes in what effect in totality that run attempts have on protections, manipulating the defense and opening more up in the passing game.

You keep coming back and pointing to the stats.. stats alone don't tell the story of how those stats were compiled.

And those gray background stories is where someone like I are pointing.. how to help the passing game.

Simple as this, the league has the rules stacked to make the offenses more dynamic via the air.. it makes little sense not to expose that and I personally have not said once that we shouldn't be a passing based team. It is how we are built.. that said, if you look at the plays themselves ( the part I love more than the statistics they drive) it is evident and clear to me how much impact running attempts have on offenses in a whole.

More so than not, you aren't going to roll up huge numbers if you are run based.. but the importance of its effects are not lost on the passing game.

Long story short. in a nutshell.. summarizing.. what ever the hell you want to call it.. dropping back and passing the ball every snap makes it too easy on a defense that has horses in the box to apply pressure. We as a team should gut every team with the pass.. but we can't forget to call run plays to assist that passing game drive the knife a little deeper.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Pack93z
14 years ago
For the record.. Romo is on the Cowherd show right now talking about the effects that running the ball has on a defense and how it assists the passing game. The effects it has has on forcing a defense (dictating to) adjust, the effects it has on the pass rush and how it moves the safety and opens holes in the coverage.

It was brief.. but much what I have been trying to convey to some of our statistical friends. ;)


Did a nice job explaining it..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
zombieslayer
14 years ago
I'm not against the run. I'm pro-pass. HUGE difference.

I'd LOVE to see Starks run for 200+ yards. But against the Steelers' D, it will be tough. They're sick against the run.

I just want to win. Our best chance of winning is throwing the ball a lot, because if the Steelers have a weakness, it's against the pass. Their four losses showed that. I provided the link if you want to check the stats.

Yes, Starks will get some carries. Guaranteed. I hope he lights them up. But I'm realistic about it. It's the Steelers D. Look at how they played the run vs the pass all year long.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Pack93z
14 years ago



Yes, Starks will get some carries. Guaranteed. I hope he lights them up. But I'm realistic about it. It's the Steelers D. Look at how they played the run vs the pass all year long.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I agree.. we are not going to "light" them up. (From the post you quoted)

I expect us to struggle to run the ball for a high YPC.. but I expect us to put in the attempts similar to post the Lions game. IMO.. it was that game where Mike McCarthy realized that he has to mix up play calling enough and varying the looks in which he ran the ball enough to truly open the passing offense up.

"Pack93z" wrote:



On the statistics.. I was there Sunday night after the Packers beat the Bears and the Steelers prevailed.

I have compiled stats, game tape and a jealous wife because of the amount of time spent on the research. I don't just throw things out there.. there is a boat load of time spent more so watching games than in the stats.. but I don't ignore the stats.

http://www.packershome.com/ForumsPro/viewtopic/t=11789.html 

1. Their corners. I don't care how much they write about the Steelers defense.. but you can attack this defense on the edges. This is not a very good group and rely on the front of the defense to minimize their exposure.

I expect a couple early double moves to force LeBeau to adjust his scheme for the day.. bring some of the heat off the pressure packages and making him drop additional guys into coverage to allow the Steelers safeties to play over the top and protect the corners.

"Pack93z" wrote:



All I want is a win.. and I thought after the Lions game that MM would adjust.. he has and we are playing our best ball of the season.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
warhawk
14 years ago
The Spread. THe Steelers don't like it and can't guard it. They have two good DB's and the rest are weak.

Facing a good spread team is the nighmare the Steelers did not want to see. I posted in another thread that NE and New Orleans combined for 34 first downs, over 630 passing yds, and 5 td's.

No wonder the Steelers are talking about getting after Rodgers. He is going to blister them Sunday.
"The train is leaving the station."
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.