Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
That made me laugh out loud. +1

Obviously, the line has improved over the course of the year, and I hope the trend continues in April with Ted Thompson drafting another solid lineman high. But I do think Rodgers makes them look a lot better with his ability to stretch plays on his feet.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
13 years ago
Rodger's quick release and quick feet make this line look much better than it is. Sitton and Bulaga make a nice right side, but from Wells over, they can improve. I don't have that much against Wells, because he is a good techinician, he is just light in the ass and always will be. DT's are going anywhere from 320 to 360 now and he just gets overhwhelmed. It's physics.

With that said, we are still a top 5 offense. We should probably all STFU about it and enjoy the ride.
UserPostedImage
wamj2008
13 years ago
Chicago's defense always play us well and their line is tough. If the wind is at 35mph and we can't run the ball, how are we going to score? Too bad we have to play the title game before we can go to the nice dome in Dallas. 😃
blank
zombieslayer
13 years ago



So we have to choose between run or pass? We can't have both?

I do want to change the line. Not this season. It's a little late to make changes now. I would love to have a line that is capable of doing both.
Other teams can do it. We can too.

"DGB454" wrote:



Porforis is right. Very few teams have an OL that can do both.

We're based on passing. I want to see Aaron healthy for the next ten years. The Patriots realize Tom Brady is their most important asset. They do everything they can to make sure their OL is elite in pass protection. We need to do the same.

By the way, our OL got beaten around and looked like rag dolls last night. That was all Aaron dodging tackles. Very little credit goes to our OL. They failed last night. Or maybe they did their best and the Falcons were just that much better. I'd like to believe it's the latter.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
azrunning
13 years ago
The bears defense is tough, much better than the falcons. Scares me. I don't see the Pack scoring as many points on them. Fortunately their offense is much more prone to mistakes and with the way our D is playing they'll have a tough time scoring.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
zombieslayer
13 years ago

The bears defense is tough, much better than the falcons. Scares me. I don't see the Pack scoring as many points on them. Fortunately their offense is much more prone to mistakes and with the way our D is playing they'll have a tough time scoring.

"azrunning" wrote:



Then we need to capitalize on their O mistakes.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
peteralan71
13 years ago
Rodgers made a lot of plays by being able to escape. The O-line has been spotty this year, having on- and off-games, but they need to step it up next week against Peppers, Urlacher and Briggs, or this game could be very very tight.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Rios39
13 years ago
The Pass protection was fine besides the play Clifton got beat. Other then that Rodgers couldnt find guys open and ran off. There were some free blitzes but that's not an O Line issue.

Rush block was pretty poor for most of the night. Gotta give credit to the Falcons but we need to be getting better push on the right side of our line especially with the big guys like Sitton and Bulaga over there.
blank
Greg C.
13 years ago
Based on the two games this season, it seems that our O-line matches up poorly with the Falcons. The Bears should give them similar problems. I hope we get some more reinforcements in the draft next year. But for now, we are the Pittsburgh Steelers. We have a QB who is exceptional at overcoming mediocre O-line play and has the receiving weapons to do it.
blank
Yerko
13 years ago
The offensive line has shown multiple times that they are less effective on turf. You have a completely different offensive line when they are playing on natural grass...

Rodgers definitely helped make this line look better than they did.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (7h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (12h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (20h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
9h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.