warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
The Falcons game plan is simple. They are a simple team.

Put together long clock eating drives and keep the other teams offense off the field. They don't turn the ball over because they take few risks. This is evident in a stat that clearly shows what they are about:

6.5

That is 6.5 Yards Per Attempt by Ryan. The lowest of any starting QB in the Playoffs.

The challenge is that the Falcons are technically sound and perform well in an unspectacular way. In that first game Atlanta had three drives of 10, 14, and 14 plays that took up over 20 minutes of clock and produced 17 points. They did much of nothing the other times they had the ball.

The way I see it is the challenge for our defense is they have been a bend but not break type D that allows yards in the middle of the field but tightens up near the redzone. This kind of has us walking right into what Atlanta wants to do.

They need to prevent long drives by stopping Turner and forcing Ryan to throw further downfield than he likes. When Turner gets the ball I hope to see our safeties up quickly helping bring that big bozo to the ground.

I don't see Woodson blitzing much because they don't ask Ryan to hold the ball long enough. I can see him bouncing around guarding Gonzo and other WR's that they want to work the ball too not far past the LOS.

Rodgers has shown he can get to the Falcons D for plenty of yards. We just need the D to prevent long drives so we can get him the ball. I will be surprised if I don't see 11 players closer to the line then we may normally see.
"The train is leaving the station."
14 years ago
I expect they will be using TE Gonzales a lot. He will be a hot read for blitzes and may try to exploit Matthews in coverage.

Look for swing passes and screens to the runningbacks getting them beyond containment and the pass rush.

That's the way I would attack the Packers' defense.
blank
Ice2White
14 years ago
I think you're right warhawk, and as a Falcons fan I'm anxious to see how our offense will react if and when the Packers' defense takes away all of the short and intermediate passing plays.

I expect we'll see a lot of no-huddle from the Falcons. This will allow Matt Ryan to call plays based on how the defense is lined up pre-snap, which prevents us from being as predictable as many people like to claim we are.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

I think you're right warhawk, and as a Falcons fan I'm anxious to see how our offense will react if and when the Packers' defense takes away all of the short and intermediate passing plays.

I expect we'll see a lot of no-huddle from the Falcons. This will allow Matt Ryan to call plays based on how the defense is lined up pre-snap, which prevents us from being as predictable as many people like to claim we are.

"Ice2White" wrote:



Uh oh, the spies are upon us.

I don't look at the Falcons as being predictable so much as being detailed oriented and doing the little things right vs. the spectacular. Ryan is going to get the ball out when and where it's supposed to go. The WR's don't have to be wide open.

Rodgers will bounce around and end up going to the 3rd receiver often. It's a different style.

I expect to see some no-huddle from the Falcons but not a lot. There's risk and reward there and they could end up giving the ball back sooner than they would like to.

I think your guy has the pressure on. #1 seed, playing at home, looking for that first playoff win. I think they will hope to get Turner plodding along and taking the pressure off.

Rodgers will be out there winging it.

My guess is you guys are wishing this was Chicago and not the Pack. No?
"The train is leaving the station."
Ice2White
14 years ago

My guess is you guys are wishing this was Chicago and not the Pack. No?

"warhawk" wrote:


I'm not blowing smoke up your a$$ when I tell you that I'm wishing this was anybody else in the NFC and not the Pack.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
dfosterf
14 years ago

My guess is you guys are wishing this was Chicago and not the Pack. No?

"Ice2White" wrote:


I'm not blowing smoke up your a$$ when I tell you that I'm wishing this was anybody else in the NFC and not the Pack.

"warhawk" wrote:



...And please go back and tell your fellow Falcon fans that we aren't the ones over-hyping the Pack against your Falcons... as you can see from the various threads we are doing plenty of bitching around here about our team, lol
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

as you can see from the various threads we are doing plenty of bitching around here about our team, lol

"dfosterf" wrote:



Thanks for reminding me.
UserPostedImage
BangTheDrum
14 years ago
They are going to try to run the ball a lot and look to TG when we bring the heat. We held their receivers in check well last game minus the TD, if we can hold Turner down a little bit better and don't turn the ball over on the goaline I don't see us losing this game.
UserPostedImage
Ba da da, Ba dadada GO PACK GO
Dulak
14 years ago

The Falcons game plan is simple. They are a simple team.

Put together long clock eating drives and keep the other teams offense off the field. They don't turn the ball over because they take few risks. This is evident in a stat that clearly shows what they are about:

6.5

That is 6.5 Yards Per Attempt by Ryan. The lowest of any starting QB in the Playoffs.

The challenge is that the Falcons are technically sound and perform well in an unspectacular way. In that first game Atlanta had three drives of 10, 14, and 14 plays that took up over 20 minutes of clock and produced 17 points. They did much of nothing the other times they had the ball.

The way I see it is the challenge for our defense is they have been a bend but not break type D that allows yards in the middle of the field but tightens up near the redzone. This kind of has us walking right into what Atlanta wants to do.

They need to prevent long drives by stopping Turner and forcing Ryan to throw further downfield than he likes. When Turner gets the ball I hope to see our safeties up quickly helping bring that big bozo to the ground.

I don't see Woodson blitzing much because they don't ask Ryan to hold the ball long enough. I can see him bouncing around guarding Gonzo and other WR's that they want to work the ball too not far past the LOS.

Rodgers has shown he can get to the Falcons D for plenty of yards. We just need the D to prevent long drives so we can get him the ball. I will be surprised if I don't see 11 players closer to the line then we may normally see.

"warhawk" wrote:



+1 WH for your analysis ...
And this makes sense - if you think about how the falcons have one of the best Olines in the league 3rd(and this is probably due to the fact that like you said if ryan looks to get rid of the ball early and fast and they run the ball alot then there isnt much time for the QB to get hit or sacked).

Like you said we stop the run and their short yardage plays then it will make ryan and company play in a way they are not used too.

I hope we get Green back in the lineup this game; need a big blocker up there to clog up the space.
Ice2White
14 years ago


+1 WH for your analysis ...
And this makes sense - if you think about how the falcons have one of the best Olines in the league 3rd(and this is probably due to the fact that like you said if ryan looks to get rid of the ball early and fast and they run the ball alot then there isnt much time for the QB to get hit or sacked).

Like you said we stop the run and their short yardage plays then it will make ryan and company play in a way they are not used too.

I hope we get Green back in the lineup this game; need a big blocker up there to clog up the space.

"Dulak" wrote:


Honestly, I don't understand the way teams try to play against us defensively. I'm sure there's a rhyme and reason for it, because defensive coordinators are way smarter than me, but I don't know what it is.

I'll tell you what I mean. In week 15, the Falcons had been blitzed more than any team in the league. I don't know if they were still the most blitzed at the end of the year. I only know this because they showed a graphic during the game in week 15. I'm not sure where to find that statistic.

Anyway, as you said, the Falcons' offensive scheme works well against pressure. Ryan gets rid of the ball quickly, we don't look to throw down feild much, and we run a lot. Ryan's numbers show this. This   article was posted on the Falcons' message board (his link didn't work or I'd just send you straight to the source). It shows that Ryan had the highest completion percentage and quarterback rating and had been sacked the fewest times in the NFL against 5 or more rushers this season.

Why do you suppose teams continue blitzing us? That's an honest question. I guess it could be that only rushing four is so ineffective that teams feel they need to send an extra guy just to have a shot at a sack, but I believe the best way to beat us is to do what the Bucs did in our second game against them. They played a lot of zone and took away the short and intermediate passing options, trying to get interceptions and to force us to throw the ball down field. They had success with this. I fear that the Packers will do that on Saturday, and I'm anxious to see how Mularkey plans on beating them if they do.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (10h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (11h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (11h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (11h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (12h) : Who? What?
beast (21h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

5h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.