4PackGirl
14 years ago

I guess the implication behind nerdmann's posts is the question: Why do Mike McCarthy's teams always seem to get their backs to the wall and require herculean efforts to surmount the obstacles into which they've cornered themselves?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



then why didn't HE say that?
jfc people - if you don't like mccarthy - say it & give your reasons why.

don't make up multiple threads just to complain about him ad infinitum.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Part of the art of rhetoric is saying things without saying them, 4PackGirl. The discerning reader can pick up on implication as well as direct meaning. 😉
UserPostedImage
evad04
14 years ago

I guess the implication behind nerdmann's posts is the question: Why do Mike McCarthy's teams always seem to get their backs to the wall and require herculean efforts to surmount the obstacles into which they've cornered themselves?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


Because as superfans the perception is always that we should be doing better. The backs-against-the-wall is as much a psychological manifestation as it is a real thing. How often do you hear fans say things like, "This shit ALWAYS happens to us!" or "We NEVER seem to put teams away!" or "That's the type of thing that ONLY ever happens to us!"

Attempting to draw conclusions from such a small sample size of games is kinda silly to me. Just as you word it NSD -- McCarthy's teams "always seem" to dig deep holes. If you drop back and looked at the evidence -- and I'm not suggesting I have -- I think you'd find we're not different from most teams in the ebb and flow of the season.

One thing I do know -- it's better to lose close games than get blown out. We just put a 45-17 lickin' on a pretty solid team. That pretty solid teams' fans are no doubt having a "Why does Coughlin always screw us?" convo on their respective forums. It's what fans do.

But for now I'll be happy that -- among other things -- our coach isn't on the losing side of a blowout.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
4PackGirl
14 years ago

Part of the art of rhetoric is saying things without saying them, 4PackGirl. The discerning reader can pick up on implication as well as direct meaning. ;)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



you are so full of shit i don't know how you fit in there.
nerdmann
14 years ago

I guess the implication behind nerdmann's posts is the question: Why do Mike McCarthy's teams always seem to get their backs to the wall and require herculean efforts to surmount the obstacles into which they've cornered themselves?

"evad04" wrote:


Because as superfans the perception is always that we should be doing better. The backs-against-the-wall is as much a psychological manifestation as it is a real thing. How often do you hear fans say things like, "This shit ALWAYS happens to us!" or "We NEVER seem to put teams away!" or "That's the type of thing that ONLY ever happens to us!"

Attempting to draw conclusions from such a small sample size of games is kinda silly to me. Just as you word it NSD -- McCarthy's teams "always seem" to dig deep holes. If you drop back and looked at the evidence -- and I'm not suggesting I have -- I think you'd find we're not different from most teams in the ebb and flow of the season.

One thing I do know -- it's better to lose close games than get blown out. We just put a 45-17 lickin' on a pretty solid team. That pretty solid teams' fans are no doubt having a "Why does Coughlin always screw us?" convo on their respective forums. It's what fans do.

But for now I'll be happy that -- among other things -- our coach isn't on the losing side of a blowout.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:





Compare to the defense. The defense always gets the most out of its players. It is greater than the sum of it's parts. This is not so with the offense. Most of the injuries are on the defensive side, but it's always the offense that underperforms. Maybe they're getting into a late season groove.
And most of those "close" game should never have been close to begin with.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
nerdmann
14 years ago

I guess the implication behind nerdmann's posts is the question: Why do Mike McCarthy's teams always seem to get their backs to the wall and require herculean efforts to surmount the obstacles into which they've cornered themselves?

"4PackGirl" wrote:



then why didn't HE say that?
jfc people - if you don't like mccarthy - say it & give your reasons why.

don't make up multiple threads just to complain about him ad infinitum.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:





I say that all the time. I articulate what I am saying repeatedly. However, some people seem to cling to the established administration no matter what. This happened when Sherman was finally shitcanned too. It was only afterward that most of the people on forums admitted that Sherman sucked shit. Then they acted like they were saying that all along.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

I guess the implication behind nerdmann's posts is the question: Why do Mike McCarthy's teams always seem to get their backs to the wall and require herculean efforts to surmount the obstacles into which they've cornered themselves?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Frankly, I did not even find a trace of any hint that this was his implication.

He asks if anyone feels comfortable with McCarthy, then cites previous week's example of outplaying a team but still losing. He then reinforces his concern by citing previous examples from this season. He clearly does not even think about previous season's which McCarthy has been around or he would've realized this team comes out ready to play when it absolutely needs to.

Then he goes on to question if anyone feels we'll be competitive in the loss. If anything, he is assuming we will lose, which is quite a big assumption to make, and certainly not warranted by his concern we may outplay the Giants yet not get a win in this "must win" game.

His post is logically incoherent.

The issue you've outlined NSD is a very interesting one, and it certainly worthy of more discussion.

Nerdmann frankly needs to be more explicit if that is what he wanted to throw out to the forum. There is certainly no hint that he is trying to use deeper rhetoric to bring about discussion on a worthwhile issue.

If that was your intent nerdmann, then I do apologize for my first post being so blunt.

However, there is no hint of that I got in your opening post. (And yes, I'm assuming if there was any hint of you raising a deeper issue, I would've gotten it)
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
4PackGirl
14 years ago
we're all aware that you SAY THAT ALL THE TIME & make thread after thread after thread to make the same point. for cripes sake man - you quoted aikman...AIKMAN!!! ;)

be negative all you want. i'll watch my packers & enjoy. i scream at my tv constantly when i don't agree with play calling but a W is a W & this was a friggin awesome W!!!
nerdmann
14 years ago

we're all aware that you SAY THAT ALL THE TIME & make thread after thread after thread to make the same point. for cripes sake man - you quoted aikman...AIKMAN!!! ;)

be negative all you want. i'll watch my packers & enjoy. i scream at my tv constantly when i don't agree with play calling but a W is a W & this was a friggin awesome W!!!

"4PackGirl" wrote:





Actually, the quote was from MM, Aikman was the one quoting him. In that quote, Mike McCarthy stated that he wanted to take shots downfield, which is one thing that I am against, because it causes the offense to underperform. Today, they had a number of long drives of 8-10 plays, which is what I like, because it shows that we are playing fundamental WCO football, moving the chains via high percentage plays and dominating time of possession, which in turn wears down the opposing defense.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
4PackGirl
14 years ago
you really ARE a nerd, aren't you? you said aikman quoted mccarthy which infers you were stating what aikman said. while it may not be the exact definition of quoting, it's so damn close, i still say you quoted aikman so...there! 😃
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (5h) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (5h) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6h) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6h) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (17h) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (18h) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (18h) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (18h) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (18h) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (18h) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (19h) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
Zero2Cool (19h) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
Zero2Cool (19h) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
Mucky Tundra (19h) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
Mucky Tundra (19h) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
Zero2Cool (20h) : 4 td for Rodgers
Zero2Cool (21h) : Chiefs got shutout
Zero2Cool (21h) : Rodgers passes for 3rd TD. might be last game of an amazing career
Mucky Tundra (21h) : "The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry."
Zero2Cool (22h) : Owner ... love it
Zero2Cool (22h) : Mayo was the guy they groomed for HC and one of the reasons they let Bill go.
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Pats have the #4 pick, lots of cap space and Maye at QB; should fetch some attention
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Well that didn't take long; Jerod Mayo out as Patriots HC
Zero2Cool (23h) : I would expect it to be higher in favor of Eagles
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Thst line seems...generous
Zero2Cool (23h) : Eagles -3.5 over Packers in Wildcard Round
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Did it though? Pokes beat the Commanders on the road with Cooper Rush previously
Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : That gives them their best chance
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Cowboys starting Trey Lance at QB vs Commanders; GB vs Philly in the Wild Card incoming!
Mucky Tundra (4-Jan) : Stinks for Lloyd. Hoping he comes back strong for next year
Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Packers placed Marshawn Lloyd on reserve non-football illness list
Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Luke Getsy been helping Packers defense. He's former OC Bears/Raiders and our old QB coach
beast (2-Jan) : Thanks dfosterf, I'm still kicking myself for last week, as I forgot to change to pick Vikings and Lions... after putting in a holding spot.
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : First alternate: Elgton Jenkins Other alternates: Jordan Love, Kenny Clark, Keisean Nixon, Tucker Kraft, Josh Myers, Jaire Alexander
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Pro Bowl still a thing? Guess Packers have three. Jacobs, Gary, McKinney.
dfosterf (2-Jan) : It's a mine field with all the players sitting, etc
dfosterf (2-Jan) : There was quite a bit of "chalk" matchups this year it seemed, but not this week coming up
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Or we got better and by we I mean everyone except me
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : We have about six that by percent would have won nearly any season. I guess 2024 was predictable 🤷
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : You can check previous seasons. I quick did it and don't think anyone hit 70% before
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
56m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

59m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Jan / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / GameDay Threads / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.