4PackGirl
14 years ago

I guess the implication behind nerdmann's posts is the question: Why do Mike McCarthy's teams always seem to get their backs to the wall and require herculean efforts to surmount the obstacles into which they've cornered themselves?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



then why didn't HE say that?
jfc people - if you don't like mccarthy - say it & give your reasons why.

don't make up multiple threads just to complain about him ad infinitum.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Part of the art of rhetoric is saying things without saying them, 4PackGirl. The discerning reader can pick up on implication as well as direct meaning. 😉
UserPostedImage
evad04
14 years ago

I guess the implication behind nerdmann's posts is the question: Why do Mike McCarthy's teams always seem to get their backs to the wall and require herculean efforts to surmount the obstacles into which they've cornered themselves?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


Because as superfans the perception is always that we should be doing better. The backs-against-the-wall is as much a psychological manifestation as it is a real thing. How often do you hear fans say things like, "This shit ALWAYS happens to us!" or "We NEVER seem to put teams away!" or "That's the type of thing that ONLY ever happens to us!"

Attempting to draw conclusions from such a small sample size of games is kinda silly to me. Just as you word it NSD -- McCarthy's teams "always seem" to dig deep holes. If you drop back and looked at the evidence -- and I'm not suggesting I have -- I think you'd find we're not different from most teams in the ebb and flow of the season.

One thing I do know -- it's better to lose close games than get blown out. We just put a 45-17 lickin' on a pretty solid team. That pretty solid teams' fans are no doubt having a "Why does Coughlin always screw us?" convo on their respective forums. It's what fans do.

But for now I'll be happy that -- among other things -- our coach isn't on the losing side of a blowout.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
4PackGirl
14 years ago

Part of the art of rhetoric is saying things without saying them, 4PackGirl. The discerning reader can pick up on implication as well as direct meaning. ;)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



you are so full of shit i don't know how you fit in there.
nerdmann
14 years ago

I guess the implication behind nerdmann's posts is the question: Why do Mike McCarthy's teams always seem to get their backs to the wall and require herculean efforts to surmount the obstacles into which they've cornered themselves?

"evad04" wrote:


Because as superfans the perception is always that we should be doing better. The backs-against-the-wall is as much a psychological manifestation as it is a real thing. How often do you hear fans say things like, "This shit ALWAYS happens to us!" or "We NEVER seem to put teams away!" or "That's the type of thing that ONLY ever happens to us!"

Attempting to draw conclusions from such a small sample size of games is kinda silly to me. Just as you word it NSD -- McCarthy's teams "always seem" to dig deep holes. If you drop back and looked at the evidence -- and I'm not suggesting I have -- I think you'd find we're not different from most teams in the ebb and flow of the season.

One thing I do know -- it's better to lose close games than get blown out. We just put a 45-17 lickin' on a pretty solid team. That pretty solid teams' fans are no doubt having a "Why does Coughlin always screw us?" convo on their respective forums. It's what fans do.

But for now I'll be happy that -- among other things -- our coach isn't on the losing side of a blowout.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:





Compare to the defense. The defense always gets the most out of its players. It is greater than the sum of it's parts. This is not so with the offense. Most of the injuries are on the defensive side, but it's always the offense that underperforms. Maybe they're getting into a late season groove.
And most of those "close" game should never have been close to begin with.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
nerdmann
14 years ago

I guess the implication behind nerdmann's posts is the question: Why do Mike McCarthy's teams always seem to get their backs to the wall and require herculean efforts to surmount the obstacles into which they've cornered themselves?

"4PackGirl" wrote:



then why didn't HE say that?
jfc people - if you don't like mccarthy - say it & give your reasons why.

don't make up multiple threads just to complain about him ad infinitum.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:





I say that all the time. I articulate what I am saying repeatedly. However, some people seem to cling to the established administration no matter what. This happened when Sherman was finally shitcanned too. It was only afterward that most of the people on forums admitted that Sherman sucked shit. Then they acted like they were saying that all along.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

I guess the implication behind nerdmann's posts is the question: Why do Mike McCarthy's teams always seem to get their backs to the wall and require herculean efforts to surmount the obstacles into which they've cornered themselves?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Frankly, I did not even find a trace of any hint that this was his implication.

He asks if anyone feels comfortable with McCarthy, then cites previous week's example of outplaying a team but still losing. He then reinforces his concern by citing previous examples from this season. He clearly does not even think about previous season's which McCarthy has been around or he would've realized this team comes out ready to play when it absolutely needs to.

Then he goes on to question if anyone feels we'll be competitive in the loss. If anything, he is assuming we will lose, which is quite a big assumption to make, and certainly not warranted by his concern we may outplay the Giants yet not get a win in this "must win" game.

His post is logically incoherent.

The issue you've outlined NSD is a very interesting one, and it certainly worthy of more discussion.

Nerdmann frankly needs to be more explicit if that is what he wanted to throw out to the forum. There is certainly no hint that he is trying to use deeper rhetoric to bring about discussion on a worthwhile issue.

If that was your intent nerdmann, then I do apologize for my first post being so blunt.

However, there is no hint of that I got in your opening post. (And yes, I'm assuming if there was any hint of you raising a deeper issue, I would've gotten it)
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
4PackGirl
14 years ago
we're all aware that you SAY THAT ALL THE TIME & make thread after thread after thread to make the same point. for cripes sake man - you quoted aikman...AIKMAN!!! ;)

be negative all you want. i'll watch my packers & enjoy. i scream at my tv constantly when i don't agree with play calling but a W is a W & this was a friggin awesome W!!!
nerdmann
14 years ago

we're all aware that you SAY THAT ALL THE TIME & make thread after thread after thread to make the same point. for cripes sake man - you quoted aikman...AIKMAN!!! ;)

be negative all you want. i'll watch my packers & enjoy. i scream at my tv constantly when i don't agree with play calling but a W is a W & this was a friggin awesome W!!!

"4PackGirl" wrote:





Actually, the quote was from MM, Aikman was the one quoting him. In that quote, Mike McCarthy stated that he wanted to take shots downfield, which is one thing that I am against, because it causes the offense to underperform. Today, they had a number of long drives of 8-10 plays, which is what I like, because it shows that we are playing fundamental WCO football, moving the chains via high percentage plays and dominating time of possession, which in turn wears down the opposing defense.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
4PackGirl
14 years ago
you really ARE a nerd, aren't you? you said aikman quoted mccarthy which infers you were stating what aikman said. while it may not be the exact definition of quoting, it's so damn close, i still say you quoted aikman so...there! 😃
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (4h) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (6h) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (7h) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (8h) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (8h) : Thank you
wpr (8h) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (8h) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (8h) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (8h) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (9h) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (9h) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (9h) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (9h) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (9h) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Bears are finalizing a deal to hire Ben Johnson as their head coach. (via @tompelissero )
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Looks like Lions OC Ben Johnson is going to be the Bears coach
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

9h / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.