zombieslayer
14 years ago
We are 23rd in the NFL in rushing attempts so we wasted plays at least more than 9 other NFL teams. ;)

Nah, I get what you're saying. I'm well-aware that we may face a team like the Giants in the Playoffs where we will have to run the ball as they're #1 against the pass and have a sick DL.

But I'm not worried. We got Starks after all. I heard Gore faked a hip injury as to avoid being compared to him next week.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
warhawk
14 years ago
I don't think McCarthy abandons the run at all. What I see is a coach trying to get the defense on their heals. He will put in his five receiver set and packages to move the ball downfield BUT he will go back and continue to run it once he gets that working.

When we play teams prolific against the run I see it as smart football to get them backing off and bringing in packages to defend our passing attack. There has been arguments here about setting up the pass with the run or run with the pass. How can you set up the run with the pass if for a measure of the game you don't push the defense with your passing game?

At some point in every game the offense has to take command. We do that by passing the football and it generally allows the run game to be adequate.

If ANYTHING I would like to see McCarthy run the no-huddle more. I think we can start dictating to the defense, get them guessing, and in bad personnel groups. Rodgers can run it without a problem and Favre did it two to three times a game that last year when we got to the NFC Championship game. That no-huddle got defenses all screwed up and they didn't know what we were doing next.

I saw a little of it Sunday and hope they bring it out more and more in this last stretch.
"The train is leaving the station."
4PackGirl
14 years ago

c'mon - give it up - you're a 12 year old girl. am i right? ;)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Yep. A 12-year-old girl with a ginormigous, pendulous clit.

"4PackGirl" wrote:



thanks for the visual & the confirmation.
dhazer
14 years ago

GBPG Loss against Falcons came down to two plays 



On both of those plays, it all came down to pad level.




"dfosterf" wrote:



Noooooooooooooooooooooooooo here we go again withe the pad level thing again :ramboface:
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
14 years ago
Final 5(back on topic), every game is winnable, as bad as some think last Sunday was, The Packers play with the intensity they did against Atlanta they should come out on top the next 5 weeks.

Just a thought, even if The Bears would win the division, The Packers might not be in to bad of shape if they get the 5th seed(1st WC), that would put them up against the winner of The West(Seahawks,49r's, Rams), probably the Packers would be favored.

Thought #2, looking ahead, as hard as it might be for some on this forum, The Vikings have become one of our best friends for the remainder of the season as they play The Bears,Giants and Eagles 3 of the next 5, I for one will be rooting for them.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Final 5(back on topic), every game is winnable, as bad as some think last Sunday was, The Packers play with the intensity they did against Atlanta they should come out on top the next 5 weeks.

Just a thought, even if The Bears would win the division, The Packers might not be in to bad of shape if they get the 5th seed(1st WC), that would put them up against the winner of The West(Seahawks,49r's, Rams), probably the Packers would be favored.

Thought #2, looking ahead, as hard as it might be for some on this forum, The Vikings have become one of our best friends for the remainder of the season as they play The Bears,Giants and Eagles 3 of the next 5, I for one will be rooting for them.

"buckeyepackfan" wrote:



Uh oh. You probably shouldn't have admitted that. I think there are some people here who blindly hate the Vikings so much that they'd rather see us eliminated from the Playoffs than rooting for the Vikings to win a few games.

I do see us winning 4 and losing to the Pats. I hope I'm wrong and we win out though.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Dulak
14 years ago

The Vikings have become one of our best friends for the remainder of the season as they play The Bears,Giants and Eagles 3 of the next 5, I for one will be rooting for them.

"buckeyepackfan" wrote:



I actually have a reason to cheer for the viks now (instead of if I have a wager on them).

Be exciting to watch them now; Just want them to at least kick the bears ass (would be funny).
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Cool. I could actually cheer for Brett Favre now without the rest of PH getting mad at me. 😉
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Greg C.
14 years ago

Uh oh. You probably shouldn't have admitted that. I think there are some people here who blindly hate the Vikings so much that they'd rather see us eliminated from the Playoffs than rooting for the Vikings to win a few games.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I don't think anybody hates the Vikings THAT much. If they do, here's what I have to say to them: Think about how sad all of the Vikings fans will be if the Packers make the playoffs. So anything that helps the Packers get in, including some Vikings victories, will just make those Vikings fans sad in the end.

Sad, sad, sad! They will be crying! Think about that Viking guy who blows the big horn at the Metrodome. He will be sad too! All of them will be sad when the playoffs start and the Packers are still playing and the Vikings are not. You don't have to cheer for them anyway. Just look at the scores and remember how it benefits us if they win. And remember how their victories will ultimately contribute to their own sadness. What a bunch of pathetic losers!
blank
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (2h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (2h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (9h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (10h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (17h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.